International Journal of Quality Innovation

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

Adopting Process Management-the Importance of Recognizing the Organizational Transformation

  • Published : 2006.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate what happens within an organization when a process view of the business is adopted. With the example of an empirical case, we aim to illustrate: how members of the organization make sense of process management; what contributions members of the organization consider to be the result of adopting a process view; and the relationship between the functional and the process structure. The empirical base in this study is one of Sweden's largest purchasing organizations within the public sector. The results are drawn from interviews with the process owners and a survey to all members involved in process teams. The case findings reveal an ambiguous image of process management. At the same time as process management solved specific organizational problems, it generated new dilemmas. It is argued that it is more rewarding to consider the adoption of the process view a 'social negotiation' rather than the result of planned implementation. The study also highlights that the meaning of process management is not anything given but something being created, and its negotiation and translation into organizational practice is open-ended. Furthermore, the study gives an illustration of the conflict between the adopted process view and the existing functional organization.

Keywords

References

  1. Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. L.(2003), 'Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited,' Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, No.2, pp. 238-256 https://doi.org/10.2307/30040711
  2. Boehm, R. and Phipps, C.(1996), 'Flatness forays,' McKinsey Quarterly, No.3, pp. 128-143
  3. Braganza, A. and Korac-Kakabadse, N.(2000), 'Towards a function and process orientation: challenges for business leaders in the new millennium,' Strategic Change, Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 45-53 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1697(200001/02)9:1<45::AID-JSC483>3.0.CO;2-T
  4. Bryman, A.(2001) Social Research Methods, Oxford, Oxford University Press
  5. Davenport, T. H.(1993), Process Innovation : Reengineering Work Through Information Technology, Boston, Mass., Harvard Business School Press [for] Ernst & Young Center for Information Technology and Strategy
  6. Edwards, C., Braganza, A, and Lambert, R.(2000), 'Understanding and managing process initiatives: a framework for developing consensus,' Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 29-36 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(200001/03)7:1<29::AID-KPM80>3.0.CO;2-0
  7. Garvin, D. A.(1998), 'The Process of Organization and Management,' Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39, No.4, pp. 33-50
  8. Hammer, M. and Stanton, S.(1999), 'How Process Enterprises Really Work,' Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77, No.6, pp. 108-118
  9. Harrington, H. J.(1991), Business Process Improvement: The Breakthrough Strategy for Total Quality, Productivity, and Competitiveness, New York, McGraw-Hill
  10. Ittner, C. D. and Larcker, D. F.(1997), 'The Performance Effects of Process Management Techniques,' Management Science, Vol. 43, No.4, pp. 522-534 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.522
  11. Jick, T. D.(1979), 'Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, No.4, p. 602 https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
  12. Juran, J. M. and Godfrey, A. B.(1999), Juran's Quality Handbook, New York, McGraw-Hill
  13. Keen, P. G. W.(1997), The Process Edge: Creating Value Where It Counts, Boston, Mass., Harvard Business School
  14. Lee, R. G. and Dale, B. G.(1998), 'Business process management: a review and evaluation,' Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 4, No.3, pp. 241-225 https://doi.org/10.1108/14637159810231027
  15. Majchrzak, A. and Wang, Q.(1996), 'Breaking the Functional Mind-Set in Process Organizations,' Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No.5, pp. 93-99
  16. McNulty, T. and Ferlie, E.(2004), 'Process Transformation: Limitations to Radical Organizational Change within Public Service Organizations,' Organization Studies, Vol. 25, No.8, pp. 1389-1412 https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604046349
  17. Melan, E. H.(1993), Process Management: Methods for Improving Products and Service, New York, McGraw-Hill
  18. Rummler, G. A. and Brache, A. P.(1995), Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass
  19. Silverman, D.(1993), Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, London, Sage
  20. Stalk Jr, G. and Black, J. E.(1994), 'The myth of the horizontal organization,' Canadian Business Review, Vol. 21, No.4, pp. 26-30
  21. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J.(1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, Calif., Sage
  22. Vanhaverbeke, W. and Torremans, H.(1999), 'Organizational structure in process-based organizations,' Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 41-52 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199903)6:1<41::AID-KPM47>3.0.CO;2-4