DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study on Center of Gravity Analysis when Performing Uchimata by Posture and Voluntary Resistance Levels of Uke in Judo[ll]

유도 허벅다리걸기 기술발휘 시 받기의 자세와 저항수준에 따른 중심변인 분석 사례연구[II]

  • Published : 2005.03.31

Abstract

It was to study as a following-research of "A Case Study on Center of Gravity(COG) Analysis when Performing Uchimata(inner thigh reaping throw) by Posture and Voluntary Resistance Levels(VRL) of Uke in Judo[I]". The purpose of this study was to analyze the COG variables when performing uchimata(inner thigh reaping throw) by two postures and voluntary resistance levels(VRL) of uke(reciver) in Judo. The subjects, who were one male judoka(YH) for 1992 Barcelona Olympic Games Olympian(silver medalist), and one male trainee; Y.I.University representative member (SDK), and were filmed on two S-VHS 16mm video cameras(60fields/sec.) through 3-dimensional motion analysis methods, that postures of uke were shizenhontai (straight natural posture) and jigohontai(straight defensive posture), VRL of uke were 0% and 100%, respectively. The kinematical variable was COG variable, distance of COG, and distance of resultant COG between uke and tori(the thrower), velocity and acceleration of COG. The data of this study collection were digitized by SIMI Motion Program computed the mean values and the standard deviation calculated for each variables. When performing uchinmata according to each posture and VRL of uke and classifying. From the data analysis and discussion, the conclusions were as follows : 1. Displacement of COG Subject YH, COG was the highest in kuzushi(balance -breaking), vertical COG was low when following in tsukuri(positioning; set-up), kake(application; execution), and COG was pattern of same character each postures and resistance, respectively. Subject SDK, COG was low from kumikata(engagement positioning) to kake, and COG was that each postures and resistance were same patterns, respectively. Subject YH, SDK, each individual, postures and resistance, vertical COG was the lowest in kake phase, when performing. 2. Distance of COG between uke and tori The distance of COG between uke and tori when performing, subject YH was $0.64{\sim}0.70cm$ in kumikata, $0.19{\sim}0.28cm$ in kake, and SDK was $0.68{\sim}0.72cm$ in kumikata, $0.30{\sim}0.42\;cm$ in kake. SDK was wider than YH. 3. Distance of resultant COG between uke and tori The distance of resultant COG between uke and tori when performing, subject YH was $0.27{\sim}0.73cm$ from kumikata to kake. and SDK was $0.14{\sim}0.34cm$ in kumikata, $0.28{\sim}0.65cm$ in kake. Jigohontai(YH:$0.43{\sim}0.73cm$,SDK:$0.59{\sim}0.65cm$) was more moved than shizenhontai(YH:$0.27{\sim}0.53cm$, SDK: $0.28{\sim}\;0.34cm$). 4. Velocity of COG The velocity of COG when performing uchimata, subject YH was fast anterior-posterior direction in kuzushi, ant.-post. and vertical direction fast in tsukuri and kake. SDK was lateral, ant.-post. and vertical direction in kuzushi, ant.-post. and vertical direction in tsukuri and ant.-post. direction in take, respectively. 5. Acceleration of COG The acceleration of COG when performing uchimata, The trend of subject YH was showed fast vertical direction in kuzushi and tsukuri, ant.-post. and vertical direction fast in kake. The trends of SDK showed lateral direction in kuzushi, lateral and ant.-post. direction in tsukuri and ant.-post. direction in kake, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. 권문석(2001), 유도 맞잡기 타입에 따른 허벅다리걸기의 운동학적 분석. 미간행 석사학위논문, 용인대학교 일반대학원.
  2. 강충식(1989), 유도 발기술의 훈련이 생체역학적 변화에 미치는 영향. 미간행 박사학위논문, 한양대학교대학원.
  3. 김의환(1984), 유도 발기술의 생체역학적 분석. 서울: 대한체육회 스포츠과학연구소.
  4. 김의환, 장은경, 설영윤, 최경택, 이상식(1984), 유도 국가대표선수 개인별 특기 기술의 생체역학적 분석, 1986년도 스포츠과학연구과제종합보고서, 대한체육회훈련원 스포츠과학연구소.
  5. 김의환(1988), 유도 메치기 기술의 생체역학적 분석 및 현장적용. 서울: 대한체육회 스포츠과학연구소.
  6. 김의환, 김관현, 김의진, 유송근, 장은경, 최규정, 천길영(1988), 유도 메치기 기술의 생체역학적 분석 및 현장적용, 1988년도 스포츠과학연구과제종합보고서[II], 대한체육회훈련원 스포츠과학연구소.
  7. 김의환(1995), 유도 메치기 기술의 생체역학적 분석을 통한 유도인형의 유용성 평가. 미간행 박사학위논문, 성균관대학교 대학원.
  8. 김의환(1995), 1995년 제18회 하계 유니버시아드대회 유도경기 조사연구원 참가보고서. 서울 : 한국체육과학연구원
  9. 김의환(1996), 유도의 경기력 요인과 구조. 아틀란타올림픽 대비 최고 경기력 발휘를 위한 방안 스포츠과학교실, 한국체육과학연구원.
  10. 김의환, 강충식, 정철정(1992), 유도 선택된 메치기 기술 발휘 시 매트반력에 관한 실험적 연구. 무도연구소지. 제4집, 제1호, 경기: 대한체육과학대학 무도연구소.
  11. 김의환, 윤 현, 김성섭(2004), 유도 허벅다리걸기 기술발휘 시 받기의 자세와 저항수준에 따른 운동학적 특성 사례연구(I). 한국운동역학회지 14권 3호, 235-257 https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2004.14.3.235
  12. 김의환, 이학래, 김정행, 김상철, 최종삼, 김기진(1991), 유도경기훈련지도서. 서울 : 한국체육과학연구원.
  13. 용인대학교유도학과교수(2000), 2000년 제27회 시드니올림픽대회 유도경기대비. 경기 : 용인대학교
  14. 유경훈(2000), 유도경기의 사용 기술 분석에 관한 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 용인대학교 교육대학원.
  15. 윤 현(1992), 유도 우수선수 허벅다리걸기기술의 운동학적 특성분석. 미간행 석사학위논문, 국민대학교 교육대학원.
  16. 장순용(1997), 여자 유도경기의 기술빈도에 관한 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 경희대학교 체육과학 대학원.
  17. 전병관(1983), 유도 기술이 경기의 승패에 미치는 영향. 미간행 석사학위논문, 경희대학교 대학원.
  18. Abdel-Aziz, Y.I. & Kararah, M(1971), Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. Im : proceedings of the ASP/U1 Symposium on Close Range Photogrammetry. Falls church, VA : American Society of photogrammetry.
  19. Kim, Eui-hwan(2003), Scientific Dis챠pline of Judo[1]. - mainly on the performance factors and deterministic model in Judo - Proceedings of the 4th 2003 International Judo Scientific Conference, Korea Judo Association.
  20. Walton, J. S. (1981), Close-range cine-photogrammetry : a generalized technique for quantifying gross human motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
  21. Winter, D. A.(1979), Biomechanics of Human Movement. New York John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

  1. A Biomechanical Analysis of Judo's Kuzushi(balance-breaking) Motion vol.17, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.2.207
  2. A Kinematic Analysis of Harai-Goshi(Hip Throw) in Judo vol.21, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2011.21.1.047