DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physical and Sensory Characteristics of Korean Style Meat Products

한국형 육가공 제품류의 물리적 및 관능적 품질 특성

  • Kim, I.S. (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Jin, S.K. (Regional Animal Industry Research Center, Jinju National University) ;
  • Hah, K.H. (Regional Animal Industry Research Center, Jinju National University) ;
  • Lyou, H.J. (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Park, K.H. (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Jinju National University)
  • 김일석 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 진상근 (동물생명산업지역협력연구센터) ;
  • 하경희 (동물생명산업지역협력연구센터) ;
  • 류현지 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 박기훈 (진주산업대학교 동물소재공학과)
  • Published : 2005.02.28

Abstract

The Korean styled meat products such as grilled and/or roasted ham(Jikhwagui: J), Bulgogi ham(B), Kimbab ham(K) and sliced roasted ham(DDukgalbi: D) were obtained from different Korean meat processing companies and investigated for their salinity, saccharinity, pH, moisture and fat content, meat color and sensory evaluation. The results obtained were as follows; Percentage of saccharinity in J, B, K and D ranged 7.5 %(13) - 12.7% (J2), 5.3 0/«B2) -7.5 o/«BI), 5.2 0/«K4) - 6.6 o/«KI, K2, KS), and 6.60/«04) - 14.4o/«Dl), respectively. Percentage of salinity in J, B, K and D ranged 2.260/«13)- 2.38 0/«J4), 1.850/«B2) - 2.45 0/«B3), 1.94o/«KI) - 2.40% (K3), and 1.830/«02) - 2.19 o/«Dl), respectively. The pH value of J, B and K were ranged 6.30 - 6.44, 6.266.37 and 6.20 - 6.42, respectively, which are slightly higher than that of D(5.86 - 6.25). Content of average moisture were higher in B(61.0 %), K(59.94%) and J(59.63%) compared to the D(55.93%). In crude fat, B and D were ranged 14-21 %, which are very lower than those of K(59.94%) and J(59.63%). In meat color, $L^*$ value were above 50.0, except D2 and D3. $a^*$ value of B were slightly higher than those of other meat products. Compared to sensory evaluation, the overall acceptability of J is excellent in the range of saccharinity 12.7%, salinity 2.3 %, moisture 61 %, crude fat II - 12%, $L^*$ value 52 - 54, and $a^*$ value 12.3- 12.7. In the case of B, the overall acceptability is excellent in the range of saccharinity 6.6 - 7.5 %, salinity 1.90- 2.45 %, moisture 60 %, crude fat 15 %, $L^*$ value 56, and $a^*$ value 15. In the case of K, the overall acceptability is excellent in the range of saccharinity 6.5 %, salinity 2.4 %, moisture 61 %, crude fat 16%, $L^*$ value 53, and $a^*$ valuce 15. In the case of D, the overall acceptability is excellent in the range of saccharinity 14.0%, salinity 2.1 %, moisture 55%, crude fat 55%, $L^*$ value 50, and $a^*$ value 13.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1998. Official methods of analysis. Association of official analytical chemist. Washinton, D.C. USA
  2. Caceres, E., Garcia, M. L., Toro, J. and Selgas, M. D. 2004. The effect of fiuctooligosaccharides on the sensory characteristics of cooked sausages. Meat Sci. 68(1):87-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.02.008
  3. Chizzolini, R., Novelli, E. and Zanardi, E. 1998. Oxidation in traditional mediterranean meat products. Meat Sci. 49:87-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)90040-7
  4. Claus, J. R. and Hunt, M. C. 1991. Low fat, high added-water bologna formulated with texture modifying ingredients. J. Food Sci. 56:643-647 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb05347.x
  5. Decker, E. A. Chan, W. K. M., Livisay, S. A., Butterfield, D. A. and Faustman, C. 1995. Interactions between carnosine and the different redox states of myoglobin. J. Food Sci. 60:1201-1204 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb04555.x
  6. Flores, M., Moya, V. J., Aristoy, M. C. and Toldra, F. 2000. Nitrogen compounds as potential biochemical markers of pork meat quality. Food Chem. 69:371-377 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00056-X
  7. Griguelmo, N., Abadias, M. l. and Martin, O. 1999. Characterization of low fat high dietary fiber frankfurters. Meat Sci. 52:247-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00173-9
  8. Higgins, F. M., Kerry, J. P., Buckley. D. J. and Morrisey, P. A. 1998. Effect of dietary $\alpha$-tocopheryl acetate supplementation on $\alpha$ -tocopherol distribution in raw turkey muscles and its effect on the storage stability of cooked turkey meat. Meat Sci. 50:373-383 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00045-X
  9. KMlA. 2004. http://www.kmia.or.kr/main.asp
  10. Lee, B. J., Hendricks, D. G. and Cornforth, D. P. 1998. Antioxidant effect of carnosine and phytic acid in a model beef system. J. Food Sci. 63:394-398 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb15750.x
  11. Phillips, A. L., Mancini, R., Sun, Q., Lynch, M. P. and Faustrnan, C. 2001. Effect of erythorvic acid on cooked colour in ground beef. Meat Sci. 57:31-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00073-5
  12. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 6.11, SAS institute, Cary, NC, U.S.A
  13. Troutt, E. S., Hunt, M. C., Johnson, D. E., Claus. J. R., Kastner, C. L., Kropf, D. H. and Stroda, S. 1992. Chemical, physical and sensory characterization of ground beef containing 5 to 30 percent fat. J. Food Sci. 57:25-29 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb05416.x
  14. Yin, M. C. and Faustman, C. 1993. Influence of temperature. pH and phospholipid composition upon the stability of myoglobin and phospholipid: a liposome model. J. Agr. Food Chem. 41:853-857 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00030a002
  15. 고순석. 1999. 전통 육제품의 산엽화. 한국조리과학회 춘계심포지엄 자료
  16. 김동훈,유영모,박범영. 1993. 육제품에 대한 소비자 실태조사, 한국축산학회 학술발표대회 초록. p. 218
  17. 김일석,진상근,하경희,류현지,하지희. 2003. 육가공품의 소비성향 및 프레스 햄류의 품질 비교. 진주산업대학교 산업과학기술연구소보. 10:39-45
  18. 김일석,진상근,하경희. 2004. 국내시장에 유통중인 소시지 및 캔류 제품의 품질 비교. 한국축산식품학회지. 24(1):50-56
  19. 남궁석. 1996. 주부 소비자와 육가공품 구매 행동에 관한 연구. 서울보건전문대 논문집. pp. 228-231, 235, 237
  20. 성삼경,나병철. 1970. 식육가공품(햄,소시지)에 대한 일반 소비자의 인식도 조사. 한국축산학회지. 12(4):282-286
  21. 윤명헌,장경만,최일신. 2001. 국내 육 가공품의 소비성향에 관한 연구. 한국축산식품학회지. 21(1):18-23
  22. 조수현,박범영,진구복,유영모,채현석,안종남,이종문,윤상기. 2003. 햄 . 소시지제품에 대한 소비자 의식 및 구매실태. 한국동물자원과학회지. 45(2):273-282

Cited by

  1. Effect of Transglutaminase, Acorn, and Mungbean Powder on Quality Characteristics of Low-fat/salt Pork Model Sausages vol.29, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2009.29.3.374
  2. Comparison of Quality Characteristics Between Meat Ball Products in Korean Domestic Market vol.55, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2013.55.5.461