The Clinical Results of Heart Valve Replacements

심장 판막 치환술의 임상 성적

  • Park Sung Min (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital) ;
  • Son Hosung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital) ;
  • Shin Jaesung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital) ;
  • Sohn Young-sang (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital) ;
  • Sun Kyung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital) ;
  • Choi Young Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital) ;
  • Kim Kwan Taik (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital) ;
  • Lee In Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital) ;
  • Kim Hackje (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital) ;
  • Kim Hyung Mook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital)
  • 박성민 (고려대학교 안암병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 손호성 (고려대학교 안암병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 신재승 (고려대학교 안산병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 손영상 (고려대학교 구로병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 선경 (고려대학교 안암병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 최영호 (고려대학교 구로병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 김광택 (고려대학교 안암병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 이인성 (고려대학교 안산병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 김학제 (고려대학교 구로병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 김형묵 (고려대학교 안암병원 흉부외과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.03.01

Abstract

In spite of the improvement in the quality of artificial heart valves and surgical techniques, the incidence of the complications following valve replacement is still high. We reviewed the clinical results of the valve replacements peformed in Korean University Anam Hospital during the last 26 years. Material and Method: The data of 571 patients who received valve replacement between December 1976 and December 2003 were reviewed. Result: There were 304 cases of MVR which was the most common procedure performed. There were 122 cases of AVR, and 111 cases of AVR with MVR. Among the 47 patients who received redo operation 38 cases were redo cases including 31 cases of MVR. $32.5\%$ of the patients who had tissue valve replacement had second valve replacement with 10.2 $\pm$ 3.9 years interval. $24.3\%$ (139/571) of the patients developed valve related complications and cerebral infarction was the highest in frequency. Atrial fibrillation was related with increased complication rates and the mechanical valve replaced group had higher hemorrhagic complication rate than tissue valve replaced group. The operative mortality was $3.68\%$ and the most common cause of the failure was low output syndrome. The operative mortality was higher in the patient group who had valve replacement before the year 1990. The patient group who had mechanical valve replacement had higher operative mortality rate th;3n the tissue valve group. The 5-year survival rate was $92.2\%$ and 10 year survival rate was $85.7\%$. Conclusion: The operative mortality of valve replacement has been improved. The mechnical valve replaced patients had higher hemorrhagic complication rate than the tissue valve replaced patients and more tissue valve replaced patients received redo valve replacement.

인공심장판막의 성능 향상과 심장 수술의 발전에도 불구하고 심장판막치환술에 따르는 합병증은 아직도 빈도가 높다. 고려대학교 안암병원에서는 지난 26년간 시행한 심장판막치환술의 임상성적을 분석하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1916년 12월부터 2003년 12월까지 고려대학교부속 안암병원에서 심장판막치환술을 받은 환자 571명을 대상으로 하였다. 결과: 승모판치환술이 304예로 가장 많았고 대동맥판막치환은 122예였으며 대동맥판막과 승모판 동시치환은 111예였다. 47명의 환자가 두번째 수술을 받았으며 그 중 재치환술은 승모판재치환술 31예를 포함하여 38예였다. 조직판막치환군의 $32.5\%$가 재치환술을 받았고 평균 10.2$\pm$3.9년만에 재수술을 받았다. $24.3\%$ (139/571)에서 판막관련 합병증이 나타났으며 뇌경색의 빈도가 가장 높았다. 심방세동이 동반된 환자군의 합병증 발생빈도가 높았고 기계판막을 치환한 환자군에서는 출혈합병증이 많았다. 수술사망률은 $3.68\%$였고 수술사망의 원인은 저심박출증후군이 가장 많았다. 90년 이전의 수술사망률이 이후보다 높았으며 기계판막치환군의 수술사망률이 조직판막치환군보다 높았다. 5년 생존율은 $92.2\%$, 10년은 $85.7\%$로 나타났다. 결론: 심장판막치환술의 수술사망률은 향상되었으며 기계판막치환군에서는 출혈합병증이 많았고 조직판막치환군에서는 재치환술의 빈도가 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim JW, Chung HK, Lee SK, Kim BJ, Shin YW. A clinical study on the surgical treatment of the rheumatic cardiac vavle disease. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;31: 346-51
  2. Harken DE, Soroff HS. Partial and complete prosthesis in aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961;40: 744-52
  3. Bailey CP, Rameirez HP, Laselere HB. Surgical treatment of aortic stenosis. JAMA 1952;150:1647-52 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1952.03680170001001
  4. Starr A, Edwards ML, McCord CW, Griswoled HE. Aortic replacement. Clinical experience with a semirigid ball valve prosthesis. Circulation 1963;27:779-804 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.27.4.779
  5. Borman JB, Brands WGB, Camilleri L, et al. Bicarbon valve -European multicenter clinical evaluation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:685-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00074-8
  6. STS National Database. Spring 2003 executive summary. Available at: http://www.ctsnet.org/doc/4502. Accessed December 30, 2003
  7. The Korean Society for Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery. Available at: http://www.ktcs.or.kr/. Accessed December 16, 2003
  8. Kim CG, Kuh JH, Jo JK, Kim KS. Long term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical heart valves: Thirteen year experience. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;30:891-97
  9. Lawrence HC, Wayne L. Selection and complications of cardiac valvular prosthesis. In: Arthur EB. Glenn's choracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2nd ed. London: Appleton & Lange 1996;2043-55
  10. Hammermeister KE, Sethi G, Henderson WG, et al. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1290
  11. Kim CW, Kim YT. Anticoagluation after mitral valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;31:1172-82
  12. Katircioglu SF, Yamak B, Ulus AT, Tasdemir O, Bayazit K. Mitral valve replacement with St. Jude Medical prosthesis and low-dose anticoagulation in patients aged over 50 years. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:455-9