Improvement of Field Screening for Winter Hardiness of Barley

  • Park Dong-Soo (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS) ;
  • Ko Jong-Min (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS) ;
  • Kim Hyun-Tae (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS) ;
  • Yang Sae-Jun (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS) ;
  • Kim Soon-Chul (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS) ;
  • Sohn Jae-Keun (Department of Agronomy, Kyungpook National University)
  • Published : 2005.09.01

Abstract

Low temperature is one of the most severe abiotic stress factors limiting growth, productivity and distribution of winter cereals. Reliable field screening method, which can detect small differences in winter survival, is important for the effective selection and development of plants to identity superior cold tolerant winter cereal genotypes. This study was undertaken to provide improved screening method of winter hardiness in the field by increasing the accuracy in evaluating winter hardiness of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). We introduced furrow in field screening of winter survival. By sowing the plants at the ridge and base, we could minimize the effect of topographic variation in a field by giving higher and lower level of stress at the same time. This method could be used by breeders to conduct accurate evaluation of winter hardiness by selecting the better treatment, which shows close to normal distribution, among the winter survival rate from the ridge, base and mean survival rate of the two in a screening field.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrews, C. J and M. K Pomeroy. 1977. Changes in survival of winter cereals due to ice cover and other simulated winter conditions, Can. J. Plant Sci. 57. 1141-1149 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps77-169
  2. Fowler, D. B., A E. Limin, A. J. Robertson, and L. V. Gusta. 1993. Breeding for low temperature tolerance in field crops. pp. 357-362 in D.R. Buxton, R. Shibles, R A. Forsberg, B L. Bad, K.H. Asay, GM. Paulsen, and R F. Wilson (eds ). International Crop Science I. CSSA. Madiso, WI. USA
  3. Fowler, D. B., L V. Gusta, and N. J Tyler 1981. Selection for winterhardiness in wheat. III. Screening methods. Crop. Sci. 21 : 896-901 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060023x
  4. Grebner, E. 1929. Frost resistance of Improved wheat. K ztelek 39 . 1151
  5. Gusta, L V., B. J. O'Connor, and M G MacHutcheon. 1997a. The selection of superior winter-hardy genotypes using a prolonged freeze test. Can J. Plant Sci 77 . 15-21 https://doi.org/10.4141/P95-197
  6. Hayhoe H N. and C. J. Andrews. 1999 Analysis of spatial and yearly variation in winter survival of winter wheat. Int. J. Biometeorol. 42 : 189-200 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050104
  7. Jenkins, G and A. P. Roffey. 1974. A method of estimating the cold hardiness of cereals by measuring electrical conductance after freezing. J. Agric. Sci. Camb 83: 87-92 https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960004702X
  8. Lelley.J. and G Mandy. 1963. Wheat. Akademi kiado, Budapest
  9. Levitt, J 1956. The hardiness of plants. Academic press, New York.
  10. Levitt, J 1972. Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Academic Press, New York. pp. 697
  11. Nam, J. H, B. H Hong, and B. K Kim. 1982 Evaluation of winter hardiness in field grown winter wheat. Korean J Breeding 14: 314-318
  12. Ohen, C. R. 1967. Freezing stress and survival. Annua. Rev. Plant Physiol. 18 : 397-408
  13. Ohen, C. R. 1969. Freezing stresses IN barley. In: Barley Genetics II. Proceedings of Second Int. Barley Genetics Symp. R. A. Nilan (ed). Pullman, WA: WSU pp.356-363
  14. Reynolds, M. P, J. I. Ortiz-Monasteno, and A. McNab (eds.). 2001. Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding Mexico, D.E: CIMMYT
  15. Steponkus, P. L 1978. Cold hardiness and freezing injury of agronomic crops. Adv Agron.30 51-98
  16. Sutka, J. 1981. Genetic studies of frost resistance in wheat Theor. Appl Genet 59: 145-154 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00264968
  17. Tischner, T., B. Koszegi, and O. Vetsz, 1997. Climatic programmes used in the Martonvasar phytotron most frequently in recent years. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 45 : 85-104