VEHICLE DYNAMIC SIMULATION USING A NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS CODE

  • Yu, Y.S. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Cho, K.Z. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Chyun, I.B. (Commercial Vehicle Research Center, Hyundai Motor Company)
  • 발행 : 2005.02.01

초록

The structural integrity of either a passenger car or a light truck is one of the basic requirements for a full vehicle engineering and development program. The results of the vehicle product performance are measured in terms of ride and handling, durability, Noise/Vibration/Harshness (NVH), crashworthiness, and occupant safety. The level of performance of a vehicle directly affects the marketability, profitability and, most importantly, the future of the automobile manufacturer. In this study, the Virtual Proving Ground (VPG) approach has been developed to simulate dynamic nonlinear events as applied to automotive ride & handling. The finite element analysis technique provides a unique method to create and analyze vehicle system models, capable of including vehicle suspensions, powertrains, and body structures in a single simulation. Through the development of this methodology, event-based simulations of vehicle performance over a given three-dimensional road surface can be performed. To verify the predicted dynamic results, a single lane change test was performed. The predicted results were compared with the experimental test results, and the feasibility of the integrated CAE analysis methodology was verified.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, S. W., Yun, J. R., Lee, J. M. and Tak, T. O. (2000). An effect of the complexity in vehicle dynamic models on the analysis of vehicle dynamic behaviors: model comparison and validation. Transactions of KSAE, 8, 6,267-278
  2. Choi, G. S. (2000). Dynamic stress analysis of vehicle using virtual proving ground approach. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0121
  3. Kim, G. H. and Choi, G. S. (2003). Dynamic stress analysis of vehicle using a nonlinear finite element method. KSME International Journal. 17, 12, 1450-1457
  4. LS-DYNA User's Manual. lSIC. livenncre. California 94550
  5. Majcher, J. S., Michaleson, R. D. and Solomon, A. R. (1976). Analysis of vehicle suspensions with static and dynamic computer simulation. SAE Paper No. 76183
  6. Suh, M. W., Koo, T. Y., Kwon, S. J. and Shin, Y. S. (2002). Development of the SVPG (Sungkyunkwan Univ. Virtual Proving Ground) : System configuration and application of the virtual proving ground. Transactions of KSAE, 10,1,195-202
  7. Tang, A., Farahani, A. and Palmer, T. (1995). Kinematic and dynamic nonlinear finite element analysis of a multibody linkage system using LS-DYNA. The 3rd International LS-DYNA Conference, Kyoto, Japan, Nov
  8. Zhang, Y. and Tang, A. (1996). The CAE revolution and the development of the virtual proving ground approach. The 4th Intemational LS-DYNA Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Sept.
  9. Zhang, Y. and Tang, A. (1997). Validation of a FEA tire model for vehicle dynamic analysis and full vehicle real time proving ground simulations. SAE Paper No. 971100
  10. Zhong, Z. H. (1993). Finite element procedures for contact-impact problems. Division of Solid Mechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linkoping University, Sweden, 1993