Pop Art-Inspired Fashion

패션에 나타난 팝 아트의 영향

  • Yim Eun-Hyuk (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2005.01.01

Abstract

Throughout the history of fashion and fashion collections, fashion design has been influenced by fine arts. Philosophy and concept of fine arts has been inspiration on the development of fashion design which brings on the close interrelation between fine arts and modern fashion. In order to analyze the affect of fine arts such as Pop art on fashion this study inquires into new perspective that considers different social contexts on the premise that acknowledges the essential difference between the genre of fine arts and design. This study researches the influence of Pop art which has been inspiration on fashion designers since the birth in the 1960s and often appears in recent fashion trends. In view of the results achieved in this study, Pop art-inspired fashion does not concern the aesthetic contemplation of everyday life in western society anonymously as in Pop art but deals with pop art as new ideas in a way that adopts images randomly from designer's convenience which is equivalent to the conception of pastiche. In addition, it was inferred that Peter Pan syndrome exert influence as a mental process and Kidult trend operate on Pop art-inspired fashion as a social phenomenon. On the basis of the theoretical background, the formative features in Pop art-inspired fashion from Spring/Summer 2000 to Spring/Summer 2004 collection has been analyzed. The results fall on the following four categories; those are the use of Pop color which resembles the Hard-edge technique in Pop art, direct appropriation of Pop art such as Andy Warhol and Roy Lichitenstein's works on clothes and accessories, adaptation of Pop art's subject using brand names of mass products or icons in mass culture as design motives, and application of representation method in Pop art such as Andy Warhol's silk screen techniques or Tom Wesselman's composition of pictures.

Keywords

References

  1. Edgar Wind (1998). Warburg's concept of 'kultur-wissenschaft' and its meaning for aesthetics, in The Art of Art History, Donald Prezioni (Ed.). London: Oxford University Press, pp. 207-209
  2. Edgar Wind (1998). Warburg's concept of 'kultur-wissenschaft' and its meaning for aesthetics, in The Art of Art History, Donald Prezioni (Ed.). London: Oxford University Press, pp. 209-210
  3. Milla Contini (1977), 5000 years of fashion. Milan: Arnoldo Mondador. p. 112
  4. Farrelle-Back & Petsch (1984), Colors compared: matisse and picasso with chanel and vionnet. American Home Economics Research Journal. 13 (22), pp, 206-214 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8401300212
  5. Marilyn Horn (1981), The second skin, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, pp. 333-341
  6. Lucy R. Lippard (1970). Pop art. London: Thames and Hudson, p. 26
  7. 노버트 린튼 (1994). 20세기의 미술. 서울: 예경. p.316
  8. Christin J. Mamiya (1992). Pop art and consumer culture. Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 2-3
  9. Christin J. Mamiya (1992). Pop art and consumer culture. Austin: University of Texas Press. p. 4
  10. Christin J. Mamiya (1992). Pop art and consumer culture. Austin: University of Texas Press. p. 5
  11. Lucy R. Lippard (1970). Pop art. London: Thames and Hudson, pp. 110-111
  12. 노버트 린튼 (1994). 20세기의 미술. 서울: 예경. p.327
  13. David McCarthy (2000). Pop art. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75-76
  14. Frederic Jameson (1991). Postmodernism or, the cultural logic of last capitalism. London: New York: Verso, pp. 16-25
  15. 양학미 (1999). 후기 자본주의 사회의 패션에 나타난 혼성모방. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. p. 18
  16. 정현숙, 양숙희 (1997). 20세기 후반 패션에 표현된 포스트모더니즘 연구. 한국의류학회지. 21 (3), pp. 503-505
  17. Marcia A. Morgana (1996). Coming to terms with Postmodernism: Theories and concepts of contemporary culture and their implication for apparel scholars. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 14(1). pp, 44-53
  18. 양희영, 양숙희 (2000), 20세기 후반 패션에 나타난 절충주의적 경향. 한국의류학회지, 24(4),pp. 538-548
  19. 이정후, 양숙희 (1999) 포스트모더니즘 패션에 나타난 불확정성(indeterminacy). 복식, 45(2), pp, 180-183
  20. 댄 카일리, 오애경 역 (1984). 피터팬 신드롬. 서울: 학원사,pp. 34-35
  21. www.samsungdesign.net
  22. Lucy R. Lippard (1970). Pop art. London: Thames and Hudson, pp. 159
  23. Lucy R. Lippard (1970). Pop art. London: Thames and Hudson, pp. 92-93
  24. Kristine Stiles (1996), Theories and documents of contemporary art: A sourcebook of artists' writings, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 289-290
  25. Lucy R. Lippard (1970). Pop art. London: Thames and Hudson, p. 113
  26. David McCarthy (2000). Pop art. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41-42
  27. Lucy R. Lippard (1970). Pop art. London: Thames and Hudson, p. 102
  28. David McCarthy (2000). Pop art. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6-7
  29. David McCarthy (2000). Pop art. London: Cambridge University Press, p. 24
  30. 노버트 린튼 (1994). 20세기의 미술. 서울: 예경. p.14
  31. Lucy R. Lippard (1970). Pop art. London: Thames and Hudson, p. 106
  32. David McCarthy (2000). Pop art. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41-42
  33. 노버트 린튼 (1994). 20세기의 미술. 서울: 예경. p.323
  34. David McCarthy (2000). Pop art. London: Cambridge University Press, p. 52
  35. 노버트 린튼 (1994). 20세기의 미술. 서울: 예경. p.384
  36. Lucy R. Lippard (1970). Pop art. London: Thames and Hudson, pp. 160-161