Clinical Utility of Dorsal Sural Nerve Conduction Studies in Patients with Polyneuropathy and Normal Sural Response

정상 장딴지 신경 반응을 보이는 다발 신경병증 환자에서의 등쪽 장딴지 신경 전도 검사의 임상적 유용성

  • Cho, Joong-Yang (Department of Neurology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Heo, Jae-Hyeok (Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Min, Ju-Hong (Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Hee (Department of Neurology, Dongguk University International Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Woo (Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 조중양 (인제대학교 일산백병원 신경과) ;
  • 허재혁 (서울대학교병원 신경과) ;
  • 민주홍 (서울대학교병원 신경과) ;
  • 김남희 (동국대학교 의과대학 신경과학교실) ;
  • 이광우 (서울대학교병원 신경과)
  • Published : 2005.12.30

Abstract

Background: The most distal sensory fibers of the feet are often affected first in polyneuropathy. However, they are not evaluated in routine nerve conduction studies. Thus we evaluated the dorsal sural sensory nerve in patients with sensorimotor polyneuropathy with normal sural response, in order to assess the usefulness in electrodiagnostic practice. Methods: In this study, 53 healthy subjects and 27 patients with clinical evidence of sensorimotor polyneuropathy were included. In all subjects, peripheral motor and sensory nerve studies were performed on the upper and lower limbs including dorsal sural nerve conduction studies. On electrodiagnostic testing, all patients had normal sural responses. Results: The dorsal sural sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) mean amplitude was $13.12{\pm}5.68{\mu}V$, mean latency was $3.12{\pm}0.43msec$, and mean sensory conduction velocity (SCV) was $36.50{\pm}3.40m/s$ in healthy subjects. In 7 of 27 patients, the dorsal sural nerve SNAPs were absent bilaterally, and in 20 patients, the mean dorsal sural nerve distal latency was longer($3.40{\pm}0.48ms$, P=0.006), and mean SCV was slower than in healthy subjects($35.08{\pm}4.59$, P=0.043). However, dorsal sural nerve amplitude was not different between the groups (P=0.072). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dorsal sural nerve conduction studies should be included in the routine electrodiagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected polyneuropathy and normal sural nerve responses.

Keywords