대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제43권5호
  • /
  • Pages.611-621
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

CAM Zirconia 완전도재 구조물의 정밀 적합도에 관한 연구

A STUDY OF PRECISE FIT OF THE CAM ZIRCONIA ALL-CERAMIC FRAMEWORK

  • 전미현 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 전영찬 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 정창모 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임장섭 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 정희찬 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Jeon Mi-Hyeon (Department of Prosthodontic, College of Dentistry, Busan National University) ;
  • Jeon Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontic, College of Dentistry, Busan National University) ;
  • Jeong Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontic, College of Dentistry, Busan National University) ;
  • Lim Jang-Seop (Department of Prosthodontic, College of Dentistry, Busan National University) ;
  • Jeong Hee-Chan (Department of Prosthodontic, College of Dentistry, Busan National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

State of problem: Zirconia all-ceramic restoration fabricated with CAM system is on an increasing trend in dentistry. However, evaluation of the marginal and internal fits of zirconia bridge seldomly have been reported. Purpose: This study was to evaluate the at of margin and internal surface in posterior 3-unit zirconia bridge framework fabricated with CAM system(DeguDent, Germany). Material and Method: Preparations of secondary premolar and secondary molar on artificial resin model were performed for fabrication of 3-unit posterior bridge framework. Fits of 5 zirconia bridge framework were compared with 5 precious ceramo-metal alloy framework(V-GnathosPlus, Metalor, Switzerland), and prepared margins were designed to chamfer and shoulder finishing line. Each framework was cemented to epoxy resin model with reinforced glass ionomer(FujiCEM, GC Co., Japan), embedded in acrylic resin and sectioned in two planes, mesio-distal and buccolingual. Samples were divided into six pieces by sectioning and had two pieces of each surface(i.e mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surface) per abutment, so there were eight measuring points in each abutment. External gap was measured at the margin and internal gaps were measured at the margin, axial and occlusal surface. Gaps were observed under the measuring microscope(Compact measuring microscope STM5; Olympus, Japan) at a magnification of $\times100$. T-test were used to determine the statistic significance of the different gaps between zirconia and metal framework. Results and Conclusion: 1. External and internal marginal gaps of zirconia and metal framework were in clinically acceptable range. External marginal gaps were not different significantly between zirconia$(81.9{\mu}m)$ and metal $(81.3{\mu}m)$ framework and internal marginal gaps of zirconia $(44.6{\mu}m)$ were smaller than those of metal framework $(58.6{\mu}m)$. 2. Internal axial gaps of zirconia framework$(96.7{\mu}m)$ were larger than those of metal frame-work$(78.1{\mu}m)$ significantly and adversely, internal occlusal gaps of zirconia frame-work$(89.4{\mu}m)$ were smaller than those of metal framework $(104.9{\mu}m)$ significantly. 3. There were no significant differences in external and internal marginal gaps between chamfer and shoulder finish line when zirconia frameworks were fabricated.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Filser F. All ceramic dental bridges by Direct Ceramic Machining(DCM). Materials in Medicine, Materials Day, Department of Materials, Eds. M.O. Speidel, P.J. Uggowitzer, vdf Hochschulverlag AG, ETH Zurich. Zurich. 1998;May:165-89
  2. Campbell SD, Sozio RB. Evaluation of the fit and strength of an all - ceramic fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:301-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90177-1
  3. Kim CH, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS. Effect of surface treatments of zirconia ceramic on the bond strength of resin cements. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2004;42: 386-96
  4. Wassell RW. Crowns and extra-coronal restorations: Materials selection. British Dental Journal 2002;192:199-211 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801334
  5. Small BW. Product review: All-ceramic system. General Dent 1998;446-8
  6. Koo JY, Lim JH, Cho IH. Marginal fidelity according to the margin types of all ceramic crowns. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 1997;35:445-7
  7. McLean JW. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:61-6 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.112545
  8. Rosenblum M. A review of All-Ceramic Restorations. JADA 1997;128:297-307 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0193
  9. Nakamura T, Nonaka M, Maruyama T. In Vitro Fitting Accuracy of Copy-Milled Alumina Cores and All-Ceramic Crowns. lnt J Prosthodont 2000;13:189-93
  10. Willer J. Computer-assisted milling of dental restorations using a new CAD/CAM data acqusition system. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:346-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70136-2
  11. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and Internal Fit of Cerec3 CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:244-8
  12. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Margi-nal Fit of Alumina and Zirconia-Based Fixed Partial Dentures Produced by a CAD/CAM System. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-74
  13. Christel. P, Meunier A, Heller M. Mechanical properties and short-term invivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:45-61 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230105
  14. Shimizu K, Oka M, Kumar P, Kotoura Y, Yamamuro T, Makinouchi K, Nakmura R. Time-dependent changes in the mechanical properties of zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:729-34 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820270605
  15. Rinke S. Marginal Accuracy and Fracture Strength of Conventional and Copy-Milled All-Ceramic Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8(4):303-10
  16. Boening KW, Wolf BH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:419-24 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109125
  17. Kalsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13:423-32 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1986.tb01304.x
  18. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  19. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations; its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00188.x
  20. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit : The Procera AlICeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:394-404 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70002-2
  21. Seong JY, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS. The fit of zirconia core fabricated with CAD/CAM system. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:489-500
  22. Chan C, Haraszthy G, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Weber H, Huettemann H. Scanning electron microscopic studies of the marginal fit of three esthetic crowns. Quintess Int 1989;20:189-93
  23. Grey N, Piddock V, Wilson M. In vitro comparison of conventional and a new all-ceramic system. J Dent 1993;21:47-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90051-Q
  24. Rinke S. Fitting accuracy of FPDs produced by a CAD/CAM system for the production of metal copings for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorati-ons. J Dent Res 1996;75:138
  25. Reports of councils and bureaus. Revised American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association Specification No.8 for zinc phosp-hate cement. JADA 1978;96:121-3
  26. Dedmon HW. Disparity in expert opinion on size of acceptable margin openings. Oper Dent 1982;7:97-101
  27. McLean JW, Fraunhofer JA. Estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  28. Pascoe DF. Analysis of the geometry of finishing lines for full crown restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:157-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90008-2
  29. Pera P, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90289-5
  30. Sye, J, Byrne G. Influence of Finish-Line Geometry on the Fit of Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:25-30