The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

COMPARISON OF MAXIMUM OCCLUSAL FORCES ON OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANT SUPPORTED FIXED PROSTHESES AND NATURAL TEETH

골유착성 임플랜트 지지 고정성 보철물과 자연치의 최대교합력 비교

  • Kwon Young-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hwang Sun-Hong (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Han Dong-Hoo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 권영숙 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 황선홍 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 한동후 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2005.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum occlusal force implant prostheses to natural teeth. Material and Method: Fifty nine patients treated either with $Br{\aa}anemark$ implants and ITI implants during the recent ten years were involved in this study. The maximum occlusal force were measured with unilateral bite force recorder and dental prescale system. Results: 1. The maximum occlusal forces of the implant prostheses and natural teeth were not significantly different where measured with unilateral bite force recorder and dental prescale system. 2. The maximum occlusal forces were not significantly different between $Br{\aa}nemark$ implant and ITI implant prostheses. 3. The maximum occlusal forces of the implant prostheses had lower when compared with natural teeth during 1-6 months functional periods when measured with the unilareral bite force recorder(P<0.05) and 1-12 months functional periods when measured with the dental prescale system(P<0.05). After these periods there was not statistical significant difference between the implant prostheses and natural teeth. 4. The maximum occlusal forces of the wide diameter implant prostheses were higher than the maximum occlusal forces of the regular diameter implant prostheses when measured with dental prescale system(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the wide diameter and the regular diameter implant prostheses when measured with unilateral bite force recorder. 5. The maximum occlusal forces of the single implant prostheses were not significantly different with the splinting implants prostheses. 6. The maximum occlusal forces of the implant prostheses were not significantly different by age and sex. 7. There was significantly different between maximum occlusal forces measured with unilateral bite force recorder and dental prescale system(P<0.0001) but there was positive correlation(r=0.52. P<0.05). Conclusion: The maximum occlusal forces of the implant prostheses were not significantly different to natural teeth during clenching and unilateral maximum biting.

Keywords

References

  1. Baba K, Clark GT, Watanabe T, Ohyama T. Bruxism force detection by a piezoelectric film-based recording device in sleeping humans. J Orofacial Pain 2003: 17: 58-64
  2. Baba K, Tsukiyama Y, Clark GT, Reliabtity, validity and utility of various occlusal measurement methods and techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2000:83:83-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70092-8
  3. Bakke M, Holm B, Jensen BL, Michler L, Moller E. Unilateral isometric bite force in 8-68 year-old woman and men related to occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res 1990:98: 149-158
  4. Duyck J, Oosterwyck VH, Sloten VJ, Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses an in vivo study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000:11:465-475 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005465.x
  5. Floystrand F, Kleven E, Oilo G. A novel miniature bite force recorder and its clinical application. Acta Odontol Scand 1982 :40: 209-214 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358209019814
  6. Grizon F, Auado E, Hure G, Basle MF, Chappard D. Enhanced bone integration of implants with increased surface roughness: a long term study in sheep. J Dent 2002: 30: 195-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00018-0
  7. Hagberg C. Assessments of bite force a review. J Craniomand Disord Facial Oral Pain 1987: 1: 162-169
  8. Haraldsson T, Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in patients with osseointegrated oral implants. Scand J Dent Res 1997: 85: 200-208
  9. Haraldsson T, Carlsson GE, Ingervall B.Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patient with osseointegrated oral implant bridges. Acta Odontol Scand 1979:37:195-206 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357909027582
  10. Haraldsson T, Zarb GA. A 10-year follow-up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges. Scand J Dent Res 1988:96:243-252
  11. Jemt T, Book K, Karlsson S. Occlusal force and mandibular movements in patients with removable overdentures and fixed prostheses supported by implants in the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993: 8:301-307
  12. Jemt T, Carlsson GE. Aspects of mastication with bridges on osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res 1986:94:66-71
  13. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseo-integrated implants in the treatment of par-tially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fix-tures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989:4:211-217
  14. Jung BY, Han DH. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with Branernark implants and natural teeth: A clinical study. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999:37:23-41
  15. Kamp T, Haradsson T, Hannerz H, Carlsson GE. Occlusal perception and bite force in young subjects with and without dental fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 1987:45:101-107 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358709098364
  16. Lindauer SG, Gay T, Rendell J. Effect of Jaw opening on masticatory muscle EMGforce characteristics. J Dent Res 1993: 72:51-55 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720010701
  17. Linderholm H, Wennstrom A. Isometric bite force and its relation to general muscle force and body build. Acta Odontol Scand 1970: 28:679-689 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357009058590
  18. Lindqvist LW, Carlsson GE. Long-term effects on chewing with mandibular fixed prostheses on osseointegrated implants. Acta Odontol Scand 1985:43:39-45 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358509064138
  19. Lundgren D, Lurell L. Occlusal force pattern during chewing and biting in dentitions restored with fixed bridge of cross-arch extension. J Oral RehabiI 1986:13:57-71 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1986.tb01556.x
  20. Lundqvist S, Haraldson T. Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla. Scand J Dent Res 1990:98:544-549
  21. Manns A,Miralles R, Palazzi C. EMG, bite force and elongation of the masseter muscle under isometric voluntary contraction and variations of vertical dimension. J Prosthet Dent 1979:42:674-682 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90200-2
  22. Matsui Y, Neukam FW, Wichmann M, Ohno K. A computerized method for evaluating distribution of occlusal load on implant supported fixed cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996:11:67-72
  23. Mericske-stern R, Assal P, Mericske E. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patient with ITI implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1995: 10: 345-354
  24. Mericske-stern R, Hofmann J, Wedig A, Geering AH. Maximal biting force and minimal pressure threshold measured on patients with overdentures supported by implants or natural roots: A comparative study, Part I. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1993:8:641-649
  25. Miura H, Watanabe S. Comparison of maximum bite force and dentate status between healthy and frail elderly persons. J Oral Rehabil 2001: 28: 592-59 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00716.x
  26. Morneburg T, Proschel P. Measurement of occlusal forces in mastication - a new approach. J Oral Rehabil 2000:27:432-460 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00570.x
  27. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal force in normal and long-face adults. J Dent Res 1983 :62: 566-570 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620051201
  28. Ramfjord SP, Ash MM. Occlusion. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1983:128-174
  29. Richer EJ, Priv-Doz, Dipl-lng. In vivo vertical force on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1995:10:99-108
  30. Sasaki K, Hannam AG, Wood WW. Relationships between the size, position, and angulation of human jaw muscles and unilateral first molar bite force. J Dent Res 1989:68:499-503 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680031401
  31. Shinogaya T, Sodeyama A, Matsumoto M. Bite force and occlusal load distribution in normal complete dentitions of young adults. Eur J Prosthodent Rest Dent 1999: 7:65-70
  32. Shinogaya T, Vilmann A, Matsumoto M. Bite force and occlusal load in healthy young subjects. Eur J Prosthodent Rest Dent 2000:8: 11-15
  33. Steenberghe D, Vries JH. The develoment of a maximal clenching force between two antagonistic teeth. J Periodont Res 1978:13:91-97 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1978.tb00157.x
  34. Tsuga K. Carlsson GE, Osterberg T, Karlsson S. Self-assessed masticatory ability in relation to maximal bite force and dental state in 80-year old subjects. J Oral Rehabil 1998: 25: 117-124
  35. Tzakis MG, Linden B, Jemt T. Oral function in patient treated with prostheses on Branemark osseointegrated implants in partially edentulous jaws: A pilot study. In J Oral Maxillofac implants 1990:5:107-111
  36. Waltimo A, Kononen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adult. Scan J Dent Res 1993: 101: 171-175
  37. Wennstrom A, Marklund G, Eriksson PO. A clinical investigation of bite force and chewing habits in patient with total maxillary denture and partial mandibular denture. Swed Dent J 1972:65:279-284
  38. Widmaln SE, Ericsson SG. Maximal bite force with centric and eccentric load. J Oral Rehabil 1982: 9: 445-450 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb01034.x