RETENTIVE FORCE OF ADJUSTABLE DENTAL IMPRESSION TRAYS WITH DIFFERENT RETENTION FORMS

유지형태에 따른 가변형 치과 인상용 트레이의 유지력에 관한 연구

  • Song Kie-Bum (Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim Sung-Rok (Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Park Kwang-Soo (Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim Yu-Lee (Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Dong Jin-Keun (Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 송기범 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김성록 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박광수 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김유리 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 동진근 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2005.02.01

Abstract

Statement of problem. The adjustable dental impression trays were made for being adjusted their width automatically along the width of dental arch. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate the best retentive form of adjustable dental impression tray, and so to make it a more satisfactory product. Material and methods. The eight pairs of adjustable trays were made of ABS(acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) with different distribution of holes and with or without the rim on the border area of them. The experiment was done with the horse-shoe shaped metal plate to pull out the set impression body from the tray, and the tray jig which was made for holding the tray on a lower part of Universal Testing Machine(UTM, Zwick Z020, Zwick Co., Germany). After the impression in the tray was allowed to set four minutes, a tensile force was applied at right angles to the tray which had been previously seated on the jig. The force was applied to measure a maximum retentive force by use of a UTM at a constant strain rate of 100mm per minute. A 2-factor analysis of variance (p<.05) was used to determine whether differences existed among distribution of retentive holes and between rim existing and not. Results. 1 The retentive force of the upper and lower resin tray with 2mm holes on the tray border was highest(25.83/24.98kg). (p<.05) 2. As the tray had more retentive holes, it was less retentive. 3. There was no significant difference in the retentive force of the varied hole intervals in the case of distributing all the area. (p>.05) 4. The rimless trays were more retentive generally, than the rimmed trays except 2 case: upper tray group-all area / 2 mm, intervals and lower tray group-margin only / 2 mm, intervals.(p<.05) 5. Most of the adjustable trays were showed higher retentive force than perforated metal tray except the lower group that perforated on the all area at intervals of 2 mm.

Keywords

References

  1. Zarb GA. Bolender CL, Hickey JC, Carlsson GE. Boucher's Prosthetic Treatment for Edentulous Patients. 10th ed. St Louis:CV Mosby Co., 150-151. 1990
  2. Myers GE, Stockman DG. Factors that affect the accuracy and dimensional stability of the mercaptan rubber-base impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1960;10:525-535 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(60)90016-0
  3. Stackhouse Jr JA. The accuracy of stone dies made from rubber impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24:377-386 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(70)90078-8
  4. Shigeto N. Murata H. Hamada T. Evaluation of the methods for dislodging the impression tray affecting the dimensional accuracy of the abutments in a complete dental arch cast. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:54-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90109-1
  5. Mendez AJ. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:383-388 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90557-8
  6. Song DS. Jin TH, Dong JK. A study on the fitness of stock tray in Korean adults. J Korea Acad Proshtodont 1989;27:131-140
  7. Song DS, Kang SK. Cho HW, Dong JK. Development of dentulous stock trays for Koreans. J Korea Acad Proshtodont 1996;34:755-778
  8. Shin SJ, Park JY, Oh SC, Dong JK. A study on the fitness of dentulous stock tray designed for Korean. Journal of Wonkwang Dental Research Institute 1997;7:193-209
  9. Dong JK. Oh SC, Kim MJ. Development of adjustable dental impression trays. 10th Meeting of the International College of Prosthodontists. Halifax, Canada. 2003 ;abstract No.51
  10. Jordan LG. Alginate Impression Materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1945;32:985-986 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1945.0128
  11. Atkinson HF, Gill HI, and Shepherd RW. Some notes on alginate impression material. Austrailian Dent J 1958;3:184-185 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1958.tb01835.x
  12. Wilson HJ, Smith DC. The bonding of alginate impression materials to impression trays. Brit Dent J 1963;115:291-294
  13. Phillips RW. Skinner's science of dental materials. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 149-156, 1982
  14. Fusayama T, Nakazato M. The design of stock trays and the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1969;21:136-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(69)90086-9
  15. Kaloyannides TM. Christidou L. Elasticity of impression materials:IV Permanent deformation as a function of time. J Dent Res 1975;54:168-173 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345750540011401
  16. Morrow RM, Brown Jr CE, Powell JM, Rudd KD. Compatibility of alginate impression materials and dental stones. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:556-566 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90214-9
  17. Lee SH. A study on the accuracy of rubber impression materials. J Korean Dent Assoc 1983;21:237-243
  18. Kim KN. Alginate impression materials. The Korea Research Society for Dental Materials 1986;13:27-32
  19. Ansari IH. Making a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials without a primary cast. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:569-571 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90132-5
  20. Milward PJ. Murphy WM. Custom. impression trays with a new hypoallergenic material. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:572-573 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90133-3
  21. Rehberg HJ. The impression tray - an important factor in impression precision. Int Dent J 1977;27:146-153
  22. Breeding LC. Dixon DL. Moseley JP. Custom impression trays: part I- Mechanical properties. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:31-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90252-6
  23. Mitchell JV. Damele JJ. Influence of tray design upon elastic impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23:51-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(70)90163-0
  24. Asgar K. Elastic impression materials. Dent Clin North Am 1971;15:81-98
  25. Linke BA, Nicholls JI. Faucher RR. Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:794-802 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90473-1
  26. Phillips RW, Schnell RJ. Dimensional stability of rubber base impressions and certain other factors affecting accuracy. J Am Dent Assoc 1958;57:39-48 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1958.0248
  27. Reisbick MH, Matyas J. The accuracy of highly filled elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:67-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(75)80148-X
  28. Ryu SI, Chang IT. Kim KN. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of the stone casts poured from completearch impressions. J Korea Acad Proshtodont 1992;30:1-13
  29. Smith SJS. McCord JF. Macfarlane TV. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:423-430 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128746
  30. Ellam AH, Smith DC. The relative effectiveness of adhesives for polysulphide impression materials. Brit Dent J 1966;120:135-138
  31. Chai JY. Jameson LM. Moser JB. Hesby RA. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: part I. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:201-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80048-4
  32. Nishigawa G. Sato T. Suenaga K, Minagi S. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:140-144 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70207-0
  33. Choi MH. Shin DK, Kim MJ. Oh SC. Dong JK. Retentive force of dental impression tray according to retention form. Korea Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion 2004;20:43-50