Factors Associated with Cancer Screening Participation, Korea

암 검진 수검에 영향을 주는 요인

  • Kwak, Min-Son (Research Institute for National Cancer Control and Evaluation, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Park, Eun-Chul (Research Institute for National Cancer Control and Evaluation, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Bang, Jin-Young (Research Institute for National Cancer Control and Evaluation, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Sung, Na-Young (Research Institute for National Cancer Control and Evaluation, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Young (Research Institute for National Cancer Control and Evaluation, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Choi, Kui-Son (Research Institute for National Cancer Control and Evaluation, National Cancer Center)
  • 곽민선 (국립암센터, 국가암관리사업지원평가연구단) ;
  • 박은철 (국립암센터, 국가암관리사업지원평가연구단) ;
  • 방진영 (국립암센터, 국가암관리사업지원평가연구단) ;
  • 성나영 (국립암센터, 국가암관리사업지원평가연구단) ;
  • 이지영 (국립암센터, 국가암관리사업지원평가연구단) ;
  • 최귀선 (국립암센터, 국가암관리사업지원평가연구단)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

Objectives : We wanted to identify those factors associated with stomach, colon, breast and cervix cancer screening. Methods : A population-based telephone survey was conducted for 2 weeks (the 9th-23th of July, 2004) by trained interviewers with using a questionnaire. 2,598 respondents (females aged 30 years or over, and the males aged 40 years or over) were selected by random-digit dialing that was based on the 2000 Population and Housing Census. The data on socio-demographic, health behavior and enabling factors were collected. 2,571 respondents were included in analysis. The cancer screening rate was classified into 2 categories : the life time screening rate and the screening rate with recommendations. Results : For the 2,571 respondent s, the life time screening rate was as follows: 52.0% (Stomach), 25.3% (Colon), 55.9% (Breast) and 76.8% (Cervix). The screening rate with recommendation was as follows : 3 9.2% (Stomach), 20.6% (Colon), 42.5% (Breast) and 58.3% (Cervix). On a multiple logistic regression analysis of the life time screening, statistically significant relationships were observed for the screening intention, the health exam, the disease history, the age of the patients and the cancer screening rates. On a multiple logistic regression analysis of the screening with recommendation, statistically significant relationships were observed for the screening intention, the health exam, the age of the patients, the concern about the risk of cancer, the voluntary health insurance for cancer and the cancer screening rates. Conclusions : The results of this study suggest that the cancer screening intention, the health exam and the age of the patients are the most important factors to participate in life time cancer screening and also screening with recommendations. A positive association was also observed for the concern about the risk of cancer, the voluntary health insurance for cancer. It is hoped that this study will be a base line data for suggesting the representative cancer screening rate in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. National Cancer Center. Cancer Information. 2004 (Korean)
  2. Chamberlain J., Moss S. Evaluation of cancer screening. Springer 1996. 87
  3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. A Study on the Expansion of National Cancer Screening Programme. 2004 (Korean)
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2001 National Health and Nutrition Survey. 2002 (Korean)
  5. Cho IS, Park YS. A study on regular cancer screening behavior among middle-aged women. Korean Soc Nurs Sci 2003; 34(1): 141-149 (Korean)
  6. Song MS, Chun KH, Song HJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening practice of women in Suwon city. Korean J Health Policy & Admin 1999; 9: 139-155 (Korean)
  7. Lee KS, Chang SH, Lee WJ. Cancer screening rate and related factors in rural area. Korean J Prev Med 2000; 33(3) : 364-372 (Korean)
  8. Kim YB, Ro WN, Lee WC, Park YM, Meng KH. The influence factors on cervical and breast cancer screening behavior of women in a city. J Korean Soc Health Edu & Promotion 2000; 17(1): 155-170 (Korean)
  9. Jirojwong S., MacLennan R., Health beliefs, perceived self-efficacy, and breast selfexamination among Thai migrants in Brisbane. J Adv Nurs 2003; 41(3): 241-249 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02552.x
  10. Lagerlund M., Hedin A., Sparen P., Thurfjell E., Lambe M. Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program. Prev Med 2000; 31: 417-428 https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2000.0723
  11. Black M., Stein K. Loveland-Cherry C. Older women and mammography screeningbehavior : Do possible selves contribute? Health Educ & Behav 2001; 29(2): 200-216
  12. Taylor VM, Schwartz S, Jackson JC, Kuniyuki A, Fischer M, Yasui Y, Tu SP, Thompson B. Cervical cancer screening among Cambodian- American women, cancer epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 1999; 8: 541-546
  13. Wardle J, McCaffery K, Nadel M, Atkin W, Socioeconomic difference in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59: 249-261 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.030
  14. Kim HJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening practice rate among Seoul and Kunggydo women. graduate school of occupational health [dissertation]. Korea : Catholic Univ; 1997 (Korean)
  15. National Health Service. NHS Cancer Screening Programme Annual Review 2003. 2004
  16. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Australia 2001-02, Cancer series 2004, no. 27
  17. www.kenkounippon21.gr.jp
  18. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Progress Report. 2003
  19. Hoffman-Goetz, L., Breen, N. Meissner, H. The impact of social class on the use of cancer screening within three racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Ethnicity Dis 1998; 8; 43-51
  20. Zackrisson S., Andersson I., Manjer J., Janzon L., Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavorable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2004; 108: 754-760 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11622
  21. Donato, F., Bollani, A., Spiazzi, R., Soldo, M., Pasquale, L., Manarca, S., Lucini, L., Nardi, G. Factors associated with non-participation of women in a breast cancer screening programme in a town in northern Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health 1991; 45: 59-64 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.45.1.59
  22. Ciatto, S., Cecchini, S., Isu, A. Maggi, A. Cammelli, S. Determinants of non-attendance to mammographic screening. Analysis of a population sample of the screening program in the district of Florence. Tumori 1992; 78: 22-25
  23. McNoe B, Richardson AK, Elwood JM. Factors affecting participation in mammography screening. N Z Med J 1996; 109(1030): 359-61
  24. Cockburn, J., Sutherland, M., Cappiello, M., Heaven, M. Predictors of attendance at a relocatable mammography service for rural women. Aust. N Z J Public Health 1997; 21: 739-742 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1997.tb01790.x
  25. Andersen M.R., Smith R., Meidchke H., Bowen D., Urban N., Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 314-320
  26. Conry, C., Main, D., Miller, R., Iverson, D., Calonge, B., Factors influencing mammogram ordering at the time of the office visit. J Fam Pract 1993; 37: 356-360
  27. Maxwell, C. J., Bancej , C. M., Snider, J., Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: Findings from 1996-1997 National Population Health Survey. CMAJ 2001; 164: 329-334
  28. Valdez, A., Banerjee, K., Ackerson, L., Fernandez, M., Otero-Sabogal, R., Somkin, C.P. Correlates of breast cancer screening among low income, low-education Latinas. Prev Med 2001; 33: 495-502 https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0913
  29. Frazier, E.L., Jiles, R.B., Mayberry, R., Use of screening mammography and clinical breast examinations among black, Hispanic and white women. Prev Med 1996; 25 : 118-125 https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1996.0037
  30. Sutton, S., Bickler, G., Sancho-Aldridge, J., Saidi, G. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1994; 48: 65-73 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.48.1.65
  31. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbook of Cancer Prevention. vol. 7 : Breast Cancer Screening. IARC Press 2002. 72-86