Determining Factors of Intention to Actual Use of Charged Long-term Care Services for the Aged

유료노인장기요양보호서비스 이용의사 결정요인

  • Yoo, Jin-Yeong (Graduate School of Public Health, Inje University) ;
  • Chun, Jin-Ho (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Inje University)
  • 유진영 (인제대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 전진호 (인제대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2005.03.01

Abstract

Objectives : To help develop strategies to cope with the changes arising from the rapid aging process by predicting the determining factors of intention to actual use of the charged long-term care services for elderly as perceived by the middle aged who play the major role of supports. Methods : Subjects were the parents (men 177, women 507) in their 40s of the students selected from a university of Busan city. A questionnaire survey was conducted for 4 weeks in October 2003 about the knowledge for long-term care service, the intention of actual use, and the preferences about the type of service suppliers. Data analysis was performed with frequency, chi-square test, and t-test using SPSS program (ver 10.0K), along with data mining using decision tree of Enterprise Miner V8.2 by SAS. Results : About half of the subjects (53.7%) had the actual experiences of elderly supports. Intentions to use the charged services were relatively high in home visiting nursing care service (40.1%) and long-term care facilities service (40.4%), and were influenced by previous knowledge about the services. The intentions were stronger in women, those with higher education, and those with greater income levels. Actual elderly supports were mostly (80%) done by women, and the perceived burdens for the supports were bigger in women and those of lower socioeconomic level. Desired charges were about 10,000 won for the bath service, 20,000 won for the rests services per day, and about 500,000 won for the long-term care facilities service per month. From the result of decision tree analysis, the job professionalism was the most important determining factor of intention to actual use of the services with validation as $63{\sim}71%$. Health and welfare mixed type facilities were preferred, and the most important consideration was the level of professionalism. Conclusions : Intention to actual use of the charged services was largely determined by the aspects of time and cost. Polices to increase the number of service suppliers and to decrease the burdens perceived by actual supporters were strongly recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. 통계청. 장례인구추계. 2001
  2. Myers GC. The Aging of Population, in International Perspectives on Aging : Population and Policy Challenges ed. Binstock, Chow, Schulz, et al. United Nations Fund for Population Activities. 1982: 11-40
  3. 선우덕, 오영희, 변재관, 이주열, 석재은, 김창엽 등. 노인 일상생활수행능력 향상을 위한 보건보지서비스 연계모형 개발 연구. 한국보건사회연구원. 2000
  4. Challis D, Darton R, Johnson L, Stone M, Traske K, Wall B. The Darlington community care project: Support fail elderly people at home, PSSRU, University of Kent, Caterbury, 1989
  5. OECD. 'Long Term Care Policies' in Background Document : The Caring World: National Achievements, Meeting at Minister Level on Social policy 1998: 45-53
  6. Sun WD. The role of the hospital according to Long-term care countermeasure for the elder. Korean J Hosp Manage 2001; 10-13 (Korean)
  7. 선우덕, 정경희, 오영희, 조애저, 석재은. 2001년도 전국 노인장기요양보호 욕구실태 조사 및 정책방안. 한국보건사회연구원. 2001
  8. 정경희, 조애저, 오영희, 선우덕, 장기요양 보호 대상 노인의 수발실태 및 복지욕구. 한국보건사회연구원. 2001
  9. Kane R. Assessing Older Person: Measures, Meaning, and Practical Application, Oxford University Press; 2000
  10. 강현철, 한상태, 최종후, 김은석, 김미경, 데이터마이닝 방법론 및 활용. 자유아카데미; 2001, p 216-230
  11. Moen P, Yu yan. 'Effective Work/Life Strategies: Working Couples, Work Conditions, Gender, and Life Quality'. Soc Proble 2000; 47(3): 291-326 https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2000.47.3.03x0294h
  12. 국가위원회. http://www.humanrights.go.kr
  13. Kim TH, Han WJ. A Review Study for Elder istreatment Measure and Intervention. J orean Gerontol Soc 1997; 17(1): 51-73 (Korean)
  14. Braithwaite Vo. 'Understanding Stress in Informal Caregiving; Is Burden a Problem of the Individual or Society', Res Aging 1996; 18(2): 139-174 https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027596182001
  15. 김수용, 박경숙, 정규석, 초의수. 2002부산광역시 노인복지실태 및 욕구조사. 사회복지법인 구덕원/부산광역시 노인종합복지관, 2002
  16. 서울특별시. 서울시 노인복지욕구기초조사연구. 1997
  17. 정경희, 조애저, 오영희, 변개관, 변용찬, 문현상. 1998년도 전국 노인생활실태 및 복지욕구조사. 한국보건사회연구원. 1998
  18. 한국보건사회연구원. 노인생활 실태분석 및 정책과제. 1994
  19. 부산광역시. 부산시 노인복지욕구 기초조사연구. 2000
  20. Chun JH, Yoo YS, Cho EH, Yu BC, Jeong KW, Urm SH, Kim SJ. Factors Influencing the of Admission into a Charged Nursing Home for the Elderly. Korean J Prev Med 2001; 34(1): 1-8 (Korean)
  21. Bengston VL, Rosenthal C, Burton L. 'Families and Aging: Diversity and Heterogeneity', in Binstock and George (Eds.) Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences 1995. p. 263-287
  22. Yun SK. Need of long-term care facilities by the agedinpatient. Daejeon(Korea): Daejeon Univ.; 2003
  23. Anderson GF. Health and Population Aging: Multinational Comparison. The Commonwealth Fund. 1999
  24. 권순원. 노인의료비 분석. 국민건강보험공단 2001; 4(9): 34-35
  25. 건강보험심사평가원. 건강보험요양급여 행위 및 그 상대가치점수 개정. 2004.7
  26. 보건복지부. 공적노인요양보장체계 최종보고서 2004.2
  27. 보건복지부. 노인요양보장체계 시안공청회. 2004.8
  28. 東鳥俊一. 個室. ユニットケアの老人病 院. 法研. 2003
  29. http://www.souseikai.or.jp