DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determining the effective width of composite beams with precast hollowcore slabs

  • El-Lobody, Ehab (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University) ;
  • Lam, Dennis (School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds)
  • Received : 2004.10.08
  • Accepted : 2005.07.07
  • Published : 2005.10.20

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effective width of composite steel beams with precast hollowcore slabs numerically using the finite element method. A parametric study, carried out on 27 beams with different steel cross sections, hollowcore unit depths and spans, is presented. The effective width of the slab is predicted for both the elastic and plastic ranges. 8-node three-dimensional solid elements are used to model the composite beam components. The material non-linearity of all the components is taken into consideration. The non-linear load-slip characteristics of the headed shear stud connectors are included in the analysis. The moment-deflection behaviour of the composite beams, the ultimate moment capacity and the modes of failure are also presented. Finally, the ultimate moment capacity of the beams evaluated using the present FE analysis was compared with the results calculated using the rigid - plastic method.

Keywords

References

  1. ABAQUS (1998), User's Manual, Ver. 5.8, Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorensen, Inc
  2. Amadio, C. and Fragiacomo, M. (2002), 'Effective width evaluation for steel-concrete composite beams', J. Constructional Steel Research, 58, 373-388 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00058-X
  3. Ansourian, P. (1975), 'An application of the method of finite elements to the analysis of composite floor systems', Proc. Insn. Civ. Engrs., Part 2, Issue 59, 699-726
  4. BS 8110 (1997): Parts 1,2, Structural Use of Concrete, 'Code of Practice for Design and Construction', British Standards Institution, London
  5. EC4 (1994), DD ENV 1994-1-1, 'Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Part 1.1, General Rules and Rules for Buildings (with U.K National Application Document)', British Standards Institution, London
  6. El-Lobody, E. and Lam, D. (2002), 'Modelling of headed stud in steel - precast composite beams', Steel and Composite Structures, 2(5), 355-378 https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2002.2.5.355
  7. El-Lobody, E. and Lam, D. (2003), 'Finite element analysis of steel-concrete composite girders', Advances in Struct. Eng. - An Int. J., 6(4), 267-281 https://doi.org/10.1260/136943303322771655
  8. Heins, C.P. and Fan, H.M. (1976), 'Effective composite beam width at ultimate load', J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 102(ST11),12538-2179
  9. Lam, D., Elliott, K.S. and Nethercot, D.A. (2000a), 'Experiments on composite steel beams with precast concrete hollow core floor slabs', Proc. of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures and Buildings, 140, 127-138
  10. Lam, D., Elliott, K.S. and Nethercot, D.A. (2000b), 'Designing composite steel beams with precast concretehollow core slabs', Proc. of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures and Buildings, 140, 139-149

Cited by

  1. Performance of composite girders strengthened using carbon fibre reinforced polymer laminates vol.49, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.07.002
  2. Finite element modelling and design of composite bridges with profiled steel sheeting vol.20, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216678865
  3. Behaviour and Design of Composite Beams with Stiffened and Unstiffened Web Openings vol.18, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.18.6.893