DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic evaluation of fluid-elevated tank-foundation/soil systems in frequency domain

  • Livaoglu, R. (Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering) ;
  • Dogangun, A. (Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering)
  • Received : 2004.10.08
  • Accepted : 2005.05.24
  • Published : 2005.09.10

Abstract

An efficient methodology is presented to evaluate the seismic behavior of a Fluid-Elevated Tank-Foundation/Soil system taking the embedment effects into accounts. The frequency-dependent cone model is used for considering the elevated tank-foundation/soil interaction and the equivalent spring-mass model given in the Eurocode-8 is used for fluid-elevated tank interaction. Both models are combined to obtain the seismic response of the systems considering the sloshing effects of the fluid and frequency-dependent properties of soil. The analysis is carried out in the frequency domain with a modal analysis procedure. The presented methodology with less computational efforts takes account of; the soil and fluid interactions, the material and radiation damping effects of the elastic half-space, and the embedment effects. Some conclusions may be summarized as follows; the sloshing response is not practically affected by the change of properties in stiff soil such as S1 and S2 and embedment but affected in soft soil. On the other hand, these responses are not affected by embedment in stiff soils but affected in soft soils.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI 371R-98. (1995), American Concrete Institute, 'Guide to the analysis design and construction of concrete-pedestal water tower'
  2. Aviles, J. and Perez-Rocha, E.L. (1998), 'Effect of foundation embedment during building-soil structure interaction', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27, 1523-1540 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199812)27:12<1523::AID-EQE798>3.0.CO;2-5
  3. Aviles, J. and Suarez, M. (2002), 'Effective periods and damping of building-foundation systems including seismic wave effects', Eng. Struct., 24, 553-562 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00121-3
  4. Bardet, P.J. (1997), Experimental Soil Mechanics, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458
  5. Bauer, H.F. (1964), Fluid Oscillations in the Containers of a Space Vehicle and Their Influence Upon Stability, NASA TR R-187
  6. Chen, C.P. and Barber, R.B. (1976), 'Seismic design of liquid storage tanks to earthquakes', Int. Symposium on Earthquake Structural Engineering, St. Louis Missouri, II: 1231
  7. Chopra, K.A. (2000), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall International Inc.
  8. Coduto, P.D. (2001), Foundation Design: Principles and Practices: Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
  9. Dobry, R. and Gazetas, G. (1986), 'Dynamic response of arbitrarily-shaped foundations', ASCE. Geotechnical Engineering Division. J., 113(2), 109-135
  10. Dutta, S.C., Jain, S.K. and Murty, C.V.R. (2000), 'Assessing the seismic torsional vulnerability of elevated tanks with RC frame-type staging', Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 19, 183-197 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00003-8
  11. Eurocode-8. (2003), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 4 (Draft No:2): Silos, Tanks and Pipelines, European Committee for Standardization, 65p.
  12. FEMA 368. (2000), The 2000 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures Part 1: Provision, NEHRP
  13. FEMA 369. (2000), The 2000 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures Part 2: Commentary, NEHRP
  14. Gazetas, G. and Tassoulas, J.L. (1987), 'Horizontal stiffness of arbitrarily-shaped embedded foundations', ASCE. Geotechnical Engineering Division. J., 113(5), 440-457 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:5(440)
  15. Haroun, M.A. and Ellaithy, M.H. (1985), 'Seismically induced fluid forces on elevated tanks', J. Technical Topics in Civil Eng., 111(1), 1-15
  16. Haroun, M.A. and Temraz, M.K. (1992), 'Effects of soil-structure interaction on seismic response of elevated tanks', Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 11(2), 73-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(92)90046-G
  17. Haroun, M.A. and Housner, G.W. (1981), 'Seismic design of liquid storage tanks', J. Tech. Councils. ASCE, 107(1), 191-207
  18. Housner, G.W. (1963), 'Dynamic behavior of water tanks', Bulletin of the Seismological Society of the America, 53, 381-387
  19. Meek, J.W. and Wolf, J.P. (1994), 'Cone models for embedded foundation', J. Geotechnical Eng., ASCE, 120(1), 60-80 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:1(60)
  20. Priestley, M.J.N., Davidson, B.J., Honey, G.D., Hopkins, D.C., Martin, R.J., Ramsey, G., Vessey, J.V. and Wood, J.H. (1986), Seismic Design of Storage Tanks, Recommendation of a Study Group the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand
  21. Resheidat, R.M. and Sunna, H. (1986), 'Behavior of elevated storage tanks during earthquakes', Proc. the 3th U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 2143-2154
  22. SAET-2004. (2004), 'A computer program for seismic analysis of elevated tanks considering fluid-structure-soil interaction', Karadeniz Technical University
  23. Takewaki, I., Takeda, N. and Uetani, K. (2003), 'Fast practical evaluation of soil-structure interaction of embedded structure', Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 23, 195-202
  24. Veletsos, S.A., Prasad, M.A. and Tang, Y. (1988), 'Design approaches for soil structure interaction', National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Technical Report NCEER-88-00331
  25. Veletsos, A.S. and Meek, J.M. (1974), 'Dynamics of behaviour of building-foundation systems', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 3, 121-138 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290030203
  26. Veletsos, A.S. (1984), Seismic Response and Design of Liquid Storage Tanks, Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems. ASCE, New York, 255-461
  27. Wolf, J.P. and Song, C.H. (1996a), Finite-Element Modeling of Unbounded Media. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
  28. Wolf, J.P. and Song, C. (1996), 'Consistent infinitesimal finite element cell method - a boundary finite-element procedure', Third Asian-Pacific Conf. on Computational Mechanics, Seoul, Korea, 16-18 September 1996
  29. Wolf, J.P. (1994), Foundation Vibration Analysis Using Simple Physical Models, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
  30. Wolf, J.P. (2002), 'Some cornerstones of dynamic soil-structure interaction', Eng. Struct., 24, 13-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00082-7
  31. Wolf, J.P. (2003), 'Dynamic stiffness of foundation embedded in layered halfspace based on wave propagating cones', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32, 1075-1098 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.263
  32. Wolf, J.P. and Meek, J.W. (1993), 'Cone models for a soil layer on a flexible rock half-space', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 22, 185-193 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220302
  33. Wolf, J.P. and Meek, J.W. (1992), 'Cone models for homogeneous soil', J. Geotechnical Eng., ASCE, 118, 686-703 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:5(686)
  34. Wolf, J.P. and Preisig, M. (2003), 'Dynamic stiffness of foundation embedded in layered halfspace based on wave propagation in cones', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32, 1075-1098 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.263
  35. Wolf, J.P. (2003), The Scaled Boundary Element Method, John Wiley&Sons
  36. Wu, W. and Smith, A. (1995), 'Efficient modal analysis for structures with soil-structure interaction', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 24, 283-289 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240211

Cited by

  1. Investigation of seismic behavior of fluid–rectangular tank–soil/foundation systems in frequency domain vol.28, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.05.005
  2. Dynamic behavior of elevated tanks with soil–structure interaction vol.31, pp.11, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.010
  3. THE NUMERICAL AND EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE OF ELEVATED TANKS CONSIDERING SOIL–STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS vol.06, pp.02, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1142/S179343111250008X
  4. Analytical solution for free vibration of flexible 2D rectangular tanks vol.122, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.05.052
  5. Soil interaction effects on sloshing response of the elevated tanks vol.5, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2013.5.4.283
  6. A simplified 3 D.O.F. model of A FEM model for seismic analysis of a silo containing elastic material accounting for soil–structure interaction vol.77, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.04.015
  7. Effect of Earthquake Characteristics on Seismic Performance of RC Elevated Water Tanks Considering Fluid Level within the Vessels vol.36, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-010-0029-1
  8. Seismic Performance of RC Elevated Water Tanks with Frame Staging and Exhibition Damage Pattern vol.14, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.387
  9. Simplified seismic analysis procedures for elevated tanks considering fluid–structure–soil interaction vol.22, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.12.004
  10. Response modification factor of elevated water tanks with reinforced concrete pedestal vol.12, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1071855
  11. Seismic assessment and retrofit of two heritage-listed R/C elevated water storage tanks vol.77, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.007
  12. An investigation about effects of fluid-structure-soil interaction on response modification coefficient of elevated concrete tanks vol.8, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3846/2029882X.2016.1157766
  13. Parametric based study for design of liquid-filled elevated tanks vol.43, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0218
  14. Effect of foundation embedment on seismic behavior of elevated tanks considering fluid–structure-soil interaction vol.27, pp.9, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.01.008
  15. Estimation of response reduction factor of RC frame staging in elevated water tanks using nonlinear static procedure vol.62, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.2.209
  16. Damage states of yielding and collapse for elevated water tanks supported on RC frame staging vol.67, pp.6, 2005, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.6.587
  17. Seismic vulnerability assessment of elevated water tanks with variable staging pattern incorporating the fluid-structure interaction vol.34, pp.None, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.062
  18. A mechanical model for soil-rectangular tank interaction effects under seismic loading vol.153, pp.None, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107092