Surgical Results of en Bloc Open-door Laminoplasty

  • Kim, Seok-Won (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Meung (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Shin, Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Sung (Department of Neurosurgery, Mok-po Hankook Hospital)
  • Published : 2005.08.28

Abstract

Objective : The purposes of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of en bloc open-door laminoplasty and to investigate the validity of various factors as prognotic indicators in patients with multisegmental spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament[OPLL]. Methods : The authors reviewed 43 cases in whom laminoplasty were performed for cervical myelopathy between January 2000 and December 2002. Clinical symptoms and results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association[JOA] scale. The recovery rate was calculated and then assessed for prognostic factors such as preoperative JOA scores, ages, history of previous trauma, duration of symptoms and signal change in cord on T2-weighted magnetic resonance Image. Results : In cervical stenosis, canal widening of antero-posterior diameter and dimension after laminoplasty is 4.16mm, $87.43mm^2$ and in OPLL is 6.20mm, $117.61mm^2$. In all cases there wasn't neurologic deterioration, mild postoperative complications developed in seven cases. Four patient had a limitation of range of neck motion and the other one showed kyphotic change and another two showed C5 radiculopathy. The recovery rate of JOA score in cervical stenosis and OPLL was 62% and 68% respectively. Duration of symptoms, the severity[preoperative JOA score], and signal change in cord on T2-weighted magnetic resonance image had close relationship to the clinical outcomes. Conclusion : Unilateral en bloc laminoplasty is simultaneous expansile and decompressive method. And preoperative JOA score, symptom duration and high signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance image can be used to predict prognosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Bohlman HH : Cervical spondylosis with morderate to severe myelopathy, A report of 17 cases treated by Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 2 : 151-162, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-197706000-00008
  2. Ehni G : Cervical Myelopathy. Surg Neurol 18 : 472, 1982
  3. Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Ebara S, Yamashita K, Ono K: The prognosis of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. An analysis of the factors involved. J Bone Joint Surg 71B: 393-398, 1989
  4. Hirabayashi K, Bohlman HH : Multiple cervical spondylosis. laminoplasry versus anterior decompression. Spine 20 : 1732-1734, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199508000-00016
  5. Inoue H, Ohmori K, Ishida Y, Suzuki K, Takatsu T: Long-term followup review of suspension laminotomy for cervical compression myelopathy. J Neurosurg 85 : 817-823, 1996 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.85.5.0817
  6. Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE, Pobereskin L : Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 93: 199-204, 2000 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2000.93.2.0199
  7. Kato Y, Iwasaki M, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Ochi T: Long-term follow-up results of laminectomy for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg 89: 217-223, 1998 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.2.0217
  8. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, Gejo R, Yoshino O :Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 12 : 392-395, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199912050-00007
  9. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y : Long-term follow-up of cervical spon dylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 77B: 956-961,1995
  10. Kim YS, Chin DK, Cho YE, Jin BH, Yoon YS, Park JP, et al: Surgical treatment for ossication of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 26: 1237-1245, 1997
  11. Kohno K, Kumon Y, Oka Y, Matsui S, Ohue S, Sakaki S : Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 48 : 237-245, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00166-3
  12. Nagata K, Ohashi T, Abe J, Morita M, Inoue A: Cervical myelopathy in elderly patients : clinical results and MRI findings before and after decompression surgery. Spine Cord 34 : 220-226, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.41
  13. Naito M, Ogata K, Kurose S, Oyama M : Canal-expansive laminoplasty in 83 patients with cervical myelopathy. A comparative study of three different procedures. Int Orthop 18: 347-351, 1994
  14. Nakano N, Nakano T, Nakano K: Comparison of the results of lam- inectomy and oper-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myleor-adiculopathy and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 13 : 792-794, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198807000-00014
  15. Ogino H, Tada K, Okade K, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto T, Ono K, et al: Canal Diameter, Anteroposterior Compression Ratio, and Spondylotic Myelopathy of the Cervical Spine. Spine 8: 1-15, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198301000-00001
  16. Okada Y, Ikata T, Yamada H, Sakamoto R, Katoh S : Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 8: 2024-2029, 1993
  17. Yone K, Sakou T, Yanase M, Ijiri K : Preoperative and postperative magnetic resonance image evaluation of the spinal cord in cervical myelopathy. Spine 17: 388-392, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199210001-00008
  18. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K: Neurologic complications of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 16 : 1277-1282, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199111000-00006