Wedge Shape Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Focusing on Changes of Lordotic Curve

  • Kim, Joon-Seok (Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Seong-Hoon (Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Bum (Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yi, Hyeong-Joong (Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ko, Yong (Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young-Soo (Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2005.10.28

Abstract

Objective : Lumbar lordotic curve on L4 to S1 level is important in maintaining spinal sagittal alignment. Although there has been no definite report in lordotic value, loss of lumbar lordotic curve may lead to pathologic change especially in degenerative lumbar disease. This study examines the changes of lumbar lordotic curve after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with wedge shape cage. Methods : We studied 45patients who had undergone posterior lumbar interbody fusion with wedge shape cage and screw fixation due to degenerative lumbar disease. Preoperative and postoperative lateral radiographs were taken and one independent observer measured the change of lordotic curve and height of intervertebral space where cages were placed. Segmental lordotic curve angle was measured by Cobb method. Height of intervertebral space was measured by averaging the sum of anterior, posterior, and midpoint interbody distance. Clinical outcome was assessed on Prolo scale at 1month of postoperative period. Results : Nineteen paired wedge shape cages were placed on L4-5 level and 6 paired same cages were inserted on L5-S1 level. Among them, 18patients showed increased segmental lordotic curve angle. Mean increased segmental lordotic curve angle after placing the wedge shape cages was $1.96^{\circ}$. Mean increased disc height was 3.21mm. No cases showed retropulsion of cage. The clinical success rate on Prolo's scale was 92.0%. Conclusion : Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with wedge shape cage provides increased lordotic curve, increased height of intervertebral space, and satisfactory clinical outcome in a short-term period.

Keywords

References

  1. Bagby GW : Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. Orthopedics 11 : 931-934, 1988
  2. Beckers L, Bekaert J : The role of lordosis. Acta Orthop Belg 57 : 198- 202, 1991
  3. Brantigan JW, Neidre A : Achievement of normal sagittal plane alignment using a wedged carbon fiber reinforced polymer fusion cage in treatment of spondylolisthesis. Spine J 3 : 186-196, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00536-3
  4. Cheng XG, Sun Y, Boonen S, Nicholson PH, Brys P, Dequeker J, et al : Measurement of vertebral shape by radiographic morphometry : sex differences and relationships with vertebral level and lumbar lordosis. Skeletal Radiol 27 : 380-384, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050402
  5. Diedrich O, Perlick L, Schmitt O, Kraft CN : Radiographic spinal profile changes induced by cage design after posterior lumbar interbody fusion preliminary report of a study with wedged implants. Spine 26 : 274-280, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200106150-00019
  6. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW : An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 10 : 1351-1358, 1995
  7. Godde S, Fritsch E, Dienst M, Kohn D : Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 28 : 1693-1699, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200308010-00012
  8. Goldstein JA, Macenski MJ, Griffith SL, McAfee PC : Lumbar sagittal alignment after fusion with a threaded interbody cage. Spine 26 : 1137-1142, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200105150-00009
  9. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McMagnus AC, Hales C : Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 23 : 1750-1767, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199808150-00008
  10. Kim YS, Chin DK, Yoon DH, Cho YE, Jin BH : Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Threaded Fusion Cage : Long-term Follow-up Results. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 28 : 1765-1772, 1999
  11. La Grone MO : Loss of lumbar lordosis a complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19 : 383-393, 1988
  12. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, et al : Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion : relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9 : 47-55, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050008
  13. Lord MJ, Small JM, Dinsay JM, Watkins RG : Lumbar lordosis effects of sitting and standing. Spine 22 : 2571-2574, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199711010-00020
  14. McAfee PC : Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg 81A : 859-880, 1999
  15. Moe JH, Winter RB, Bradford DS, Lonstein JE : Kyphosis-lordosis; general principles. In : Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformities. Philadelphia : W.B. Saunders, 1978, pp325-330
  16. Saraste H, Brostrom LA, Aparisi T : Prognostic radiographic aspects of spondylolisthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn 25 : 427-432, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518402500515
  17. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon GP, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, et al : Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine 7 : 335-342, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198207000-00003
  18. Stephens GC, Yoo JU, Wilbur G : Comparison of lumbar sagittal alignment produced by different operative positions. Spine 21 : 1802- 1806, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199608010-00016
  19. Tribus CB, Belanger TA, Zdeblick TA : The effect of operative position and short-segment fusion on maintenance of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. Spine 24 : 58-61, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199901010-00014
  20. Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Vrbos LA, Knight GW, et al : The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25 : 1617-1624, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200007010-00004
  21. Weiner BK, Fraser RD : Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine 23 : 634-640, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199803010-00020