Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지

Expandable Cage for Cervical Spine Reconstruction

  • Zhang, Ho-Yeol (Department of Neurosurgery, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Thongtrangan, Issada (Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center) ;
  • Le, Hoang (Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Jon (Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Daniel H. (Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center)
  • Published : 2005.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : Expandable cage used for spinal reconstruction after corpectomy has several advantages over nonexpendable cages. Here we present our clinical experience with the use of this cage after anterior column corpectomy with an average of one year follow up. Methods : Ten patients underwent expandable cage reconstruction of the anterior column after single-level or multilevel corpectomy for various cervical spinal disorders. Anterior plating with or without additional posterior instrumentation were performed in all patients. Functional outcomes, complications, and radiographic outcomes were determined. Results : There was no cage-related complication. Functionally, neurological examination revealed improvement in 7 of 10 patients and no patient had neurological deterioration after the surgery. Immediate stability was achieved and maintained throughout the period of follow-up. There was minimal subsidence [<2mm] noticeable in three of the cases that underwent a two-level corpectomy. Subsidence was noted in osteoporotic patients and patients undergoing multi-level corpectomies. Average pre-operative kyphotic angle was 9 degrees. This was corrected to an average of 5.4 degrees in lordosis postoperatively. Conclusion : In conclusion, expandable cages are safe and effective devices for vertebral body replacement after cervical corpectomy when used in combination with anterior plating with or without additional posterior stabilization. The advantages of using expandable cages include its ability to easily accommodate itself into the corpectomy defect, its ability to tightly purchase into the end plates after expansion and thus minimizing the potential for migration, and finally, its ability to correct kyphosis deformity via its in vivo expansion properties.

Keywords

References

  1. Agrillo U, Mastronardi L, Puzzilli F : Anterior cervical fusion with carbon fiber cage containing coralline hydroxyapatite : preliminary observations in 45 consecutive cases of soft-disc herniation. J Neurosurg 96 : 273- 276, 2002
  2. Cho DY, Liau WR, Lee WY, Liu JT, Chiu CL, Sheu PC : Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone(PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery 51 : 1343-1350, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200212000-00003
  3. Coumans JV, Marchek CP, Henderson FC : Use of the telescopic plate spacer in treatment of cervical and cervicothoracic spine tumors. Neurosurgery 51 : 417-424, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200208000-00021
  4. Dorai Z, Morgan H, Coimbra C : Titanium cage reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Neurosurg 99 : 3-7, 2003 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.99.1.0003
  5. Eleraky MA LC, Llanos C, Sonntag VK : Cervical corpectomy : report of 185 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 90 : 35-41, 1999 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.1999.90.1.0035
  6. ElSaghir H, Bohm H : Anterior versus posterior plating in cervical corpectomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120 : 549-554, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020000153
  7. Greene DL, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Park SC, Crandall D : Biomechanical comparison of cervical interbody cage versus structural bone graft. Spine J 3 : 262-269, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(03)00029-9
  8. Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT, Whitecloud TS 3rd, Pienkowski D : Complications of multilevel cervical corpectomies and reconstruction with titanium cages and anterior plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 : 1-8; discussion 8-9, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200302000-00001
  9. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Schaefer J, Scholz M, Ludwig K, Schleiher P, et al : Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the cervical spine. J Neurosurg 99 : 91-97, 2003
  10. Krbec M, Stulik J, Tichy V : Replacement of the vertebral body with an expansion implant (Synex). Acta Chir Orthop traumatol Cech 69 : 158-162, 2002
  11. Majd ME, Vadhva M, Holt RT : Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cages with anterior plating. Spine 24 : 1604-1610, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908010-00016
  12. Narotam PK, Pauley SM, McGinn GJ : Titanium mesh cages for cervical spine stabilization after corpectomy : a clinical and radiological study. J Neurosurg 99 : 172-180, 2003
  13. Schnee CL FA, Freese A, Weil RJ, Marcotte PJ : Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion. Spine 22 : 2222-2227, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199710010-00005
  14. Siddiqui AA, Jackowski A : Cage versus tricortical graft for cervical interbody fusion. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg 85B : 1019-1025, 2003
  15. Thalgott JS, Xiongsheng C, Giuffre JM : Single stage anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages, local bone graft, and anterior plating. Spine J 3 : 294-300, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00588-0
  16. Thome C, Krauss JK, Zevgaridis D : A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurosurg Rev 27 : 34-41, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-003-0297-2
  17. Thongtrangan I BR, Le H, Park J, Kim DH : Vertebral body replacement with an expandable cage for reconstruction after spinal tumor reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus 15 : Article 8, 2003
  18. Tribus CB CD, Zdeblick TA : The efficacy of anterior cervical plating in the management of symptomatic pseudoarthrosis of the cervical spine. Spine 24 : 860-864, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199905010-00005
  19. Ulmar B, Cakir B, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M : Vertebral body replacement with expandable titanium cages. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142 : 449-455, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820345
  20. Wittenberg RH, Moeller J, Shea M, White AA 3rd, Hayes WC : Compressive strength of autologous and allogenous bone grafts for thoracolumbar and cervical spine. Spine 15 : 1073-1078, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199015100-00017