A Study on the Relation between Apparel Manufacturers' SCM Activities and Their Major Textile Suppliers` and Retailers` Characteristics

의류 제조업체의 SCM 활동과 주거래 공급 사슬 특성과의 상관성에 관한 연구

  • 홍인숙 (서울대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 정은숙 (명지대학교 의상디자인학과)
  • Published : 2005.02.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study are to examine the supply chain management (SCM) actiities of apparel manufacturers and then to investigate the relation between apparel manufacturers' SCM activities and their major textile suppliers' and retaileers' characteristics. The data was collected from the apparel manufacturers categorized into the six product areas - woman's formal dress(30%), boy and girl's casual wear (30%), man's formal dress(15%), sports and golf wear(10%), inner wear (10%) and infant & children's wear(5%) - headquartered in Seoul, by quota convenience sampling during August 14-September 4 in 2003. From 150 questionnires of delivery, 125 were collected and 123 from 64 manufacturers were used for analysis. The SPSSWIN 10.0 was used for frequency analysis, descriptive statistics analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis and canonical correlation analysis. the results of the study are as follows : (1) The SCM activities of apparel manufacturers showed that the activity levels of the factors of information systems ans understanding of demand characteristics were ranked on top while the activity level of collaborative partnership factor was lowest. (2) As the level of SCM activities such as communication and exchange of opinion, and commitment and leadership of a top management became higher, the elements of delivery performance, interest in total cost and relationship of the textile suppliers were more improved. (3) The SCM activities such as communication an exchange of opinion, intgrated management organization, management flexibilty, and collaorative partnership contributed for improvement of collaborative relationship with retailers.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽보선. (2001). 공급제안관리 시스템이 물류성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위
  2. 김영민. (2000). 한국기업의 공급제안관리(SCM) 도입 요인에 관한 연구-무역업체를 중심으로. 중앙대학교 대학 원박사학위 논문
  3. 김영진. (1999). 우리나라 섬유산업에서의 QR/SCM의 문제점과 효율정안 도입방안에 대한 연구-의류제품의 공급 사슬을 중심으로. 서강대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  4. 박대식. (2000). 섬유산업의 QR(Quick Response)활용에 관한 국내외 사례연구. 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  5. 박연우. (2001). SCM의 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 - Y사 공급채널을 중심으로. 중앙대학교 대학윈 석사학위 논문
  6. 박진우. (2002). 우리나라 섬유산업의 공급체인관리(SCM) 도입요인에 관한 연구. 한국외국어대학교 경영정보대학원석사학위논문
  7. 섬유산업연합회. (2003). 섬유.패션산업의 새로운도전. 서울: 정문사
  8. 양일모. (2002) 물류성과에 영향을 미치는 공급망관리 요인에 관한 연구. 생산성논집, 16(3)
  9. 어패럴뉴스편집부. (2003). 2003/2004 한국패션브랜드연감. 서울:어패럴뉴스사
  10. 이명호, 이우형, 조하용. (2002). 공급체인관리가 기업의 물류비용과 고객서비스에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 경영 관련학회 통합학술대회 발표 논문집,1-7
  11. 이영윤. (2000). Supply Chain Management와 Outsourcing 을 통한 경쟁력우위 창출 전략, 한양대학교 산업경영대 학원석사학위 논문
  12. 최석윤. (2000). 패션의류산업의 공급 사슬에 대한 비교연규. 대기업과 동대문 시장. 한국 과학기술원 테크노경영대 학원석사학위논문
  13. 한동철. (2002). 공급사슬관리 SCM. 서울: 시그마인사이트컴
  14. Artz, K. W. (1999). Buyer-supplier performance: the role of asset specificity, reciprocal investments and relational exchange. British Journal of Management, 10(2), 113-125 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00114
  15. Basner, C., Comer, J., Wisner, J. & Tan, K. C. (2003). Benchmarking supply chain management practice in New Zealand. Supply chain management: An International Journal, 8(1), 57-64 https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540310463369
  16. Bechtel, C. & Jayaram, J. (2002). Supply chain management: a strategic perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 15-34
  17. Cooper, M. C, Lambert, D. M. & Pagh, J. D. (1997a). Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099710805556
  18. Ellarn, L. M. (1991). Key success factors and barriers international on purchasing partner-ships. Management Decision, 29(7), 40-44
  19. Ellram, L. M. (1995). Partnering pitfalls and success factors. International Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management, 31(2), 36-44
  20. Ellram, L. M., Gardner, J. T. & Hanks, A. M. (1997b). Meshing multiple alliance. Journal of Business Logistics, 18(1),67-89
  21. Fearne, A. & David, H. (1999). Success factors in the fresh produce supply chain: in sight from the UK. Supply Chain Management, 4(3), 120-128 https://doi.org/10.1108/13598549910279567
  22. Goffin, K., Szwejczewski M. & New, C. (1997). Managing suppliers: when fewer can mean more. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 27(7), 422-436 https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039710188486
  23. Handfield, R. B. & Nichols, J. E. L. (1999). 공급사슬관리, 김선민 역 (1999). 서울: 석정
  24. Hansen, T. H. & Skytte, H. (1998). Retailer buying behavior: a review. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 8(3), 277-301 https://doi.org/10.1080/095939698342788
  25. Higginson, J. K. & Alarn, A. (1997). Supply chain management techniques in medium-to-small manufacturing firm. lntemational Journal of Logistics Management, 8(2), 19-31 https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099710805646
  26. Lee, Y. & Kincade, D. H. (2003). US apparel manufacturers' company characteristic differences based on SCM activities. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7(1), 31-48 https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020310464359
  27. Mcpherson, E. M. (1987). Apparel manufacturing management system: A computer-oriented approach. Parkridge, NJ: Noyes Publication
  28. Narasimhan, R. & Das, A. (1999). Manufacturing' agility and supply chain management practices. Production and Inventory Management Journal, first quarter, 4-10
  29. Speckman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W. J. & Myhr, N. (1998). An empirical investigation into supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 28(8), 63-50
  30. Subramanian, A. & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 637-547
  31. Tim, M., Milena, H. & Yufei, Y. (2002). Supply chain collaboration alternatives: understanding the expected costs and benefits. Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12(4),348-364 https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240210438416