Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회지)

Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회)
권호 표지

Development of Source Profiles and Estimation of Source Contribution for VOCs by the Chemical Mass Balance Model in the Yeosu Petrochemical Industrial Complex

여수석유화학산단 내 VOCs에 대한 오염원 분류표의 개발 및 CMB 모델에 의한 기여도 산정

  • 전준민 (순천제일대학 환경과) ;
  • 허당 (순천제일대학 환경과) ;
  • 김동술 (경희대학교 환경ㆍ응용화학대학 대기오염연구실 및 환경연구센터)
  • Published : 2005.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to characterize the local levels of VOCs (volatile organic compounds), to develop source profiles of VOCs, and to quantify the source contribution of VOCs using the CMB (chemical mass balance) model. The concentration of VOCs had been measured every 6-day duration in the SRO monitoring site in the Yeosu Petrochemical Industrial Complex from September 2000 to August 2002. The total of 35 target VOCs, which were included in the TO-14 designated from the U.S. EPA, was selected to be monitored in the study area. During a 24-h period, the ambient VOCs were sampled by using canisters placing about 10 ～ 15 m above the ground level. The collected canisters were then analyzed by a GC-MS in the laboratory. Aside from ambient sampling at the SRO site, the VOCs had been intensively and massively measured from 8 direct sources and 4 general sources in the study area. The results obtained in the study were as follows; first, the annual mean concentrations of the target VOCs were widely distributed regardless of monitoring sites in the Yeosu Petrochemical Industrial Complex. In particular, the concentrations of BTX (Benzene, Toluene, Xylene), vinyl chloride were higher than other target compounds. Second, based on these source sample data, source profiles for VOCs were developed to apply a receptor model, the CMB model. Third, the results of source apportionment study for the VOCs in the SRO Site were as follows; The source of petrochemical plant was apportioned by 31.3% in terms of VOCs mass. The site was also affected by 16.7% from wastewater treatment plant, 14.0% from iron mills, 8.4% from refineries, 4.4% from oil storage, 3.8% from automobiles, 2.3% from fertilizer, 2.3% from painting, 2.2% from waste incinerator, 0.6% from graphic art, and 0.4% from gasoline vapor sources.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부(2001), 도로교통통계연보
  2. 국립환경연구원(2001) 2000년 대기오염물질배출량
  3. 국립환경연구원(1997) 여천공단 환경오염대책 마련을 위한 오염실태정밀조사 사업, 단행본
  4. 김영성 (1999) 산업단지 대기질 관리, HAP인가 VOC인가?, 한국대기환경학회지, 15(4), 513-517
  5. 백성옥, 김영민, 황승만(1998) 고속도로 터널내부 공기 중 휘발성유기화합물의 농도 측정, 한국대기보전학회지, 14(1), 73-77
  6. 여수화력발전처(2003) 자동기상측정망 자료
  7. 이영재 (2001) 광주지역 대기 중 휘발성유기화합물의 농도 및 배출원 특성에 관한 연구, 조선대학교 박사학위논문
  8. 전라남도(2003) 광양만권 대기환경규제지역 지정에 따른 실천계획 수립, 단행본
  9. 전준민, 허 당, 김동술(2003) 여수산단 대기 중 휘발성유기화합물질 농도 경향, 한국대기환경학회지, 19(6), 663-677
  10. 전준민, 허 당, 김동술(2002) Canister와 GC/MSD를 이용한 대기 중 VOCs 분석시스템의 정도관리(QC), 한국대기환경학회지, 18(6), 527-538
  11. 영산강유역환경관리청 (2001) 국감자료
  12. 한국과학기술연구원(1996) 여천공단 주변마을 환경영향 및 대책에 관한 연구, 단행본
  13. 한국산업단지공단(2001) 통계자료
  14. Blifford, I.H. and G.O. Meeker (1967) A factor analysis model large scale pollution, Atmos. Environ., 1, 147-157 https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(67)90042-X
  15. Chan, C.C., C.K. Nien, and J.S. Hwang (1996) Receptor modeling of VOCs, CO, $NO_{x}$ and THC in Taipei, Atmos. Environ., 30(1), 25-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00261-V
  16. Cheng, L., L. Fu, R.P. Angle, and H.S. Sandhu (1997) Seasonal variations of volatile organic compounds in Edmonton, Alberta, Atmos. Environ., 31(2), 239-246
  17. Chung, J., R.A. Wadden, and P.A. Scheff (1996) Development of ozone-precursor relationships using VOC receptor modeling, Atmos. Environ., 30(18), 3167-3179 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00015-5
  18. Derwent, R.G., T.J. Davies, M. Delaney, G.J. Dollard, R.A Field, P. Dumitrean, P.D. Nason, B.M.R. Jones, and S.A. Pepler (2000) Analysis and interpretation of continuous hourly monitoring data for 26 $C_{2}$-$C_{8}$ hydrocarbons at 12 United Kingdom sites during 1996, Atmos. Environ., 34, 297-312 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00203-4
  19. Fujita, E.M., J.G. Watson, J.C. Chow, and K.L. Magliano (1995) Receptor model and emissions inventory source apportionments of nonmethane organic gases in California's San Joaquin Valley and San Francisco Bay area, Atmos. Environ., 29(21), 3019-3035 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00122-F
  20. Gertler, A.W., E.M. Fujita, W.R. Pierson, and D.N. Wittorff (1996) Apportionment of NMHC tailpipe vs nontailpipe emissions in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora Mountain tunnels, Atmos. Environ., 30(12), 2297-2305 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00090-9
  21. Gorden, G.E. (1988) Receptor models, Environ. Sci. & Technol., 22(10), 1132-1142 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00175a002
  22. Hopke, P.K. (1985) Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry, John Willy & Sons
  23. Miller, M.S., S.K. Friedlander, and G.M. Hidy (1972) A chemical element balance for the Pasadena aerosol, J. Colloid and Inter. Science, 39(1), 165-176 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(72)90152-X
  24. Na, K.S. and Y.P. Kim (2001) Seasonal characteristics of ambient volatile organic compounds in Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Environ., 35, 2603-2614 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00464-7
  25. Parrish, D.D. and F.C. Fehsenfeld (2000) Methods for gasphase measurements of ozone, ozone precursors and aerosol precursors, Atmos. Environ., 34, 1921-1957 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00454-9
  26. Pierson, W.R., A.W. Gertler, N.F. Robinson, J.C. Sagebiel, B. Zielinska, G.A. Bishop, D.H. Stedman, R.B. Zweidinger, and W.D. Ray (1996) Real-world automotive emissions-summary of studies in the Fort Mchency and Tuscarora Mountain tunnels, Atmos. Environ., 30, 2233-2256 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00276-6
  27. Scheff, P.A., R.A. Wadden, D.M. Kenski, and J. Chung (1996) Receptor model evaluation of the Southeast Michigan ozone study ambient NMOC measurements, AWMA, 46(11), 1048-1057
  28. Scheff, P.A. and R.A. Wadden (1993) Receptor modeling of volatile organic compounds. I. emission inventory and validation, Environ. Sci. & Technol., 27(4), 617-625 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00041a005
  29. Scheff, P.A., R.A. Wadden, B.A. Bates, and P.F. Aronian (1989) Source fingerprints for receptor modeling of volatile organics, JAPCA, 39(4), 469-478
  30. Thijsse, T.R., R.F. van Oss, and P. Lenschow (1999) Determination of source contributions to ambient volatile organic compound concentrations in Berlin, AWMA, 49(12), 1394-1404
  31. US EPA (1999) Compendium Method TO-15 Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs) in Air Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), Compendium Method for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, 2nd ed., EPA/625/R -96/010b
  32. US EPA (1997) Compendium Method TO-14A Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs) in Ambient Air Using Specially Prepared Canisters with Subsequent Analysis By Gas Chromatography, Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, 2nd ed., EPA/625/R -96/010b
  33. Vega, E., V. Mugica, R. Carmona, and E. Valencia (2000) Hydrocarbon source apportionment in Mexico City using the chemical mass balance receptor model, Atmos. Environ., 34, 4121-4129 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00496-3
  34. Wadden, R.A. and P.A. Scheff (1994) Receptor modeling of VOCs; II. Development of VOC control functions for ambient ozone, Atmos. Environ., 28(15), 2507-2521 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90401-4
  35. Watson, J.G., N.F. Robinson, C. Lewis, and T. Coulter(1998) Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model version 8 (CMB8) User's Manual, Desert Research Institute Document No. 1808.1D1, USA
  36. Watson, J.G. (1979) Chemical Element Balance Receptor Model Methodology for Assessing the Source of Fine and Total Particulate Matter in Portland, Oregon, Ph.D. Oregon Graduate Center, Beaverton, OR