DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nest Distribution of Skuas on Barton and Weaver Peninsulas of the King George Island, the Antarctic

남극 킹조지 섬의 바톤 및 위버 반도에서 번식하는 도둑갈매기류의 둥지 분포

  • 김정훈 (경희대학교 생물학과, 한국조류연구소) ;
  • 정호성 (한국해양연구원 부설 극지연구소) ;
  • 김지희 (한국해양연구원 부설 극지연구소) ;
  • 유정칠 (경희대학교 생물학과, 한국조류연구소) ;
  • 안인영 (한국해양연구원 부설 극지연구소)
  • Published : 2005.12.31

Abstract

The ratio of breeding pairs of brown skuas (Catharacta lonnbergi), south polar skuas (C. maccormicki) and mixed species pairs between Barton and Weaver peninsulas remained the same $(X^2-test,\;X^2=0,503,\;df=2,\;p=0.778)$. The nests of skuas were clustered on Barton, whereas they were distributed randomly on the Weaver peninsula. The distance between brown skua nests, and that of mixed species pair nests were longer than those of south polar skua nests. Brown skua nests were distributed along the coast. Whereas, the nests of mixed species pairs and south polar skuas were found more frequently inland (Kruskal-Wallis, $X^2=11.631$, df=2, p<0.005). There was no interspecific difference in the distances between skua nests and Penguin rookery at Barton (Kruskal-Wallis, $X^2=2.153$, df=2, p=0.341) or at King Sejong Station (ANOVA, F=1.483, df=2, p=0.229). In general, skuas prefer lower locales (<125m above sea level) for their nest building sites. Brown skua nests were distributed mainly on the beach, whereas south polar skua were distributed on the predominant periglacial landforms and till areas $(X^2-test,\;X^2=24.988,\;df=8,\;p<0.005)$.

Keywords

References

  1. 김도홍. 2002. 먹이공급의 변동이 젠투펭귄(Pygoscelis papua)과 턱끈펭귄(P. antarctica)의 번식에 미치는 영향. p. 195-222. In: 남극 세종기지 주변 인간 활동으로 인한 환경변화모니터링. 한국해양연구원 보고서, EC PP 01 001-B2.
  2. 장순근. 1999. 남극 세종기지 부근에 출현하는 조류(鳥類). 경희대학교 한국조류연구소 연구보고, 7, 19-35.
  3. Brooke, M.L, D. Keith, and N. Rov. 1999. Exploitation of inland breeding Antarctic petrels by south polar skuas. Oecologia, 121, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050903
  4. Burton, R.W. 1968a. Breeding biology of the Brown Skua,Catharacta skua lonnbergi (Mathews), at Signy Island,South Orkney Islands. Brit. Antarct. Surv. Bull., 15, 9-28.
  5. Burton, R.W. 1968b. Agonistic behavior of the Brown Skua,Catharacta skua lonnbergi (Mathews). Brit. Antarct.Surv. Bull., 16, 15-39.
  6. Devillers, P. 1978. Distribution and relationships of SouthAmerican skuas. Le Gerfaut, 68, 374-417.
  7. Ecklund, C.R. 1961. Distribution and life history studies ofthe south polar skua. Bird Banding, 32, 187-223. https://doi.org/10.2307/4510894
  8. Ens, B.J., F.J. Weissing, and R.H. Drent. 1995. The despoticdistribution an deferred maturity: two sides of the samecoin. Am. Nat., 146, 625-650. https://doi.org/10.1086/285818
  9. Hagelin, J.C. and G.D. Miller. 1997. Nest-site selection inSouth Polar Skuas: balancing nest safty and access toresources. Auk, 114, 638-645. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089283
  10. Hahn, S. and H.-U. Peter. 2003. Feeding territoriality andthe reproductive consequences in brown skuas Catharactaantarctica lonnbergi. Polar Biol., 26, 552-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-003-0522-z
  11. Hahn, S., M. Ritz, and H.-U. Peter. 2003. Living in mixedpairs-Better for fitness? A study in Skuas. p. 229-233.In: Antarctic Biology in a Global Context. eds. by A.H.L.Huiskes, W.W.C. Gieskes, J. Rozema, R.M.L. Schorno,S.M. van der Vies and W.J. Wolff. Backhuys Publishers,Leiden.
  12. Hamilton, W.D. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. J.Theor. Biol., 31, 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5
  13. Hemmings, A.D. 1984. Aspects of the breeding biology ofMcCormick’s Skua Catharacta maccormicki at SigniIslands. Brit. Antarct. Surv. Bull., 65, 65-79.
  14. Hemmings, A.D. 1990. Human impacts and ecologicalconstraints on skuas. p. 230-244. In: Antarctic Ecosystems,Ecological Change and Conservation. eds. by K.R.Kerry and G. Hemple. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  15. Hull, C., C. Carter, and M.D. Whitehead. 1994. Aspects ofbreeding chronology and success of the Antarctic skuaCatharacta maccormicki at Magnetic Island, Prydz Bay,Antarctica. Corella, 18, 37-40.
  16. Johnston, G.C. 1973. Predation by Southern Skua on rabbitson Macquarie Island. Emu, 73, 25-26. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU973019d
  17. Johnston, V.H. and J.P. Ryder. 1987. Divorce in Larids: areview. Colon. Waterbirds, 10, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521226
  18. Lopez-Martínez, J.E. Serrno, and J.I. Lee. 2002. Geomorphologicalmap of Barton and Weaver peninsulas, KingGeorge Island, Antarctica. E. 1:10,000. Korea OceanReaserch and Development Institute. Seoul, Korea.
  19. Muller-Schwarze, D. and C. Muller-Schwarze. 1973. Differentialpredation by south polar skuas in an Adelie penguinrookery. Condor, 75, 127-131. https://doi.org/10.2307/1366548
  20. Norman, F.I., R.A. McFarlane, and S.J. Ward. 1994. Carcassesof Adelie penguins as a food source for south polarskuas: some preliminary observations. Willson Bull., 106,26-34.
  21. Parmelee, D.F. 1988. The hybrid skua: a southern oceanenigma. Wilson Bull., 100, 345-356.
  22. Peter, H.-U., M. Kaiser, and A. Gebauer. 1990. Ecologicaland morphological investigations on south polar skuas(Catharacta maccormicki) and brown skuas (Catharactalonnbergi) on Fildes Peninsula, King George Island,South Shetland Islands. Zool. J. Syst., 117, 201-218.
  23. Pezzo, F., S. Olmastroni, S. Corsolini, and S. Focardi. 2001.Factors affecting the breeding success of the south polarskua Catharacta maccormicki at Edmonson Point, VictoriaLand, Antarctica. Polar Biol., 24, 389-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000000213
  24. Pietz, P.J. 1986. Daily activity patterns of south polar andbrown skuas near Palmer Station, Antarctica. Auk, 130,726-736.
  25. Pietz, P.J. 1987. Feeding and nesting ecology of sympatricSouth Polar and brown skuas. Auk, 104, 617-627.
  26. Reinhardt, K., S. Hahn, and H.-U. Peter. 2000. A review ofthe diets of Southern Hemisphere skuas. Mar. Ornithol.,28, 7-19.
  27. Sladen, W.J.L. 1958. Some aspects of the behaviour of theAdelie and Chinstrap Penguins. p. 241-246. In: Acta 11thInt. Ornith. Cong. Basel.
  28. Stonehouse, B. 1956. The Brown Skua, Catharacta skualonnbergi (Mathews) of South Georgia. Sci. Rept. Brit.Antarct. Surv., 14, 1-25.
  29. Trillmich, F. 1978. Feeding territories and breeding successof south polar skuas. Auk, 95, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/4085492
  30. Trivelpiece, W. and N.J. Volkman. 1982. Feeding strategiesof sympatric south polar Catharacta maccormicki andbrown skua C. lonnbergii. Ibis, 124, 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1982.tb03740.x
  31. Trivelpiece, W., R.G. Butler, and N.J. Volkman. 1980.Feeding territories of the brown skuas (Catharactalonnbergi). Auk, 97, 669-676.
  32. Voiter, S.C., S. Bearhop, A. MacCormick, N. Ratcliff, andR.W. Furness. 2003. Assessing the diet of great skua,Catharacta skua, using five different techniques. PolarBiol., 26, 20-26.
  33. Wang, Z.P. and H.-U. Peter. 2004. Ecological differences ofsouth polar skua populations from Fildes Peninsula ofKing George Island and eastern Larsemann Hills,Antarctica. Chinese J. Polar Sci., 15, 89-107.
  34. Wang, Z.P. and I. Norman. 1995. Population dynamics ofsouth polar skua in Larsemann Hills, Antarctica. Antarct.Res., 7, 25-31.
  35. Wang, Z.P. and I. Norman. 1996. Human influences onbreeding of south polar skuas in the eastern LarsemannHills, Princess Elizabeth Land East Antarctica. PolarRec., 32, 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400027650
  36. Ward, P. and A. Zahavi. 1973. The importance of certainassemblages of birds as “Information centers” for foodfinding. Ibis, 115, 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1973.tb01990.x
  37. Wood, R.C. 1971. Population dynamics of breeding southpolar skuas of unknown age. Auk, 88, 805-814. https://doi.org/10.2307/4083839
  38. Young, E.C. 1963a. The breeding behaviour of the SouthPolar Skua, Catharacta maccormicki. Ibis, 105, 203-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1963.tb02496.x
  39. Young, E.C. 1963b. Feeding habitats of the south polar skuaCatharacta maccormicki. Ibis, 105, 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1963.tb02509.x

Cited by

  1. Incubation capacity limits clutch size in south polar skuas vol.22, pp.01, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102009990393