The Response of QTL in Generation during Selection

선발과정에서의 세대별 QTL 좌위 고정에 관한 연구

  • Lee Ji-Woong (Division of Animal Genomics & Bioinformatics, National livestock Research Institute, RDA,)
  • 이지웅 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the response of QTL in each generation during selection to develop inbred lines. The simulation program was written in Fortran. Magnitude of QTL effects, base population size, number of QTL assigned to population, and the allelic frequency for the positive allele at each major QTL were highly associated with number of generations to fixation of QTLs during selection. Populations with larger QTL effects and larger base population size had more individuals with fixed QTL. However, a smaller number of QTL assigned to population had a higher fraction of individuals with fixed QTL at each generation compared with more populations with QTL. This simulation study will help to design biological experiments for detection of QTL-marker association using inbred population and to determine optimum number of lines with fixed QTL during inbred line development. To complement this study, additional simulation should be need with abundant replicates, more various population sizes, magnitude of QTL effects, and recombination between markers and QTLs.

Keywords

References

  1. Darvasi A, Weinreb A, Minke V, Weller JI and Soller M. 1993. Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics, 134: 943-951
  2. Dentine MR. 1992. Marker-assisted selection in cattle. Anim. Biotech., 3:81-93 https://doi.org/10.1080/10495399209525764
  3. Georges M, Nielsen D, Mackinnon M, Mishra A and Okimoto R. 1995. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics, 139: 907-920
  4. Kashi Y, Iraqi F, Tikochisky Y, Ruzitsky B, Nave A, Beckmann JS, Friedmann A, Soller M and Gruenbaum Y. 1990. $(TG)_{n}$ uncovers a sex-specific hybridization pattern in cattle. Genomics, 7:31-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-7543(90)90515-V
  5. Kashi Y, Soller M, Hallerman EM and Beckmann JS. 1986. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in dairy cattle genetic improvement, XII. pp. 57 in Proc. 3rd World Congr. Genet. Appl, Livestock Prod., Lincoln, NE
  6. Meuwissen THE and van Adrendonk JAM. 1992. Potential improvements in rate of genetic gain from marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes. J. Dairy. Sci., 75:1651-1659 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77922-3
  7. Smith C and Simpson SP. 1986. The use of genetic polymorphisms in livestock improvement. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 103:205-217 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.1986.tb00083.x
  8. Soller M and Beckmann JS. 1982. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms and genetic improvement, VI:396-404 in Proc. 2nd World Congr. Genet. Appl, Livest. Prod., Madrid
  9. Soller M and Beckmann JS. 1983. Genetic polymorphism in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet., 67:25-33 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303917
  10. Soller M and Genizi A. 1978. The efficiency of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between a marker locus and a locus affecting a quantitative trait in segregating populations. Biometrics, 34:47-55 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529587