Analysis of Hydrodynamic Separators for Combined Sewer Overflows and Stromwater Runoff Control

합류식 하수관거 월류수 및 우수관거 유출수의 수리동력학적 오염부하저감장치의 분석

  • Received : 2004.09.21
  • Accepted : 2005.02.19
  • Published : 2005.04.15

Abstract

Appropriate removal of pollutants from combined sewer overflows(CSOs) and stormwater runoff is of primary concern to watershed managers trying to meet water quality standards even under a wet weather condition. Harmful substances associated with particles besides TSS and BOD are subjected to removal prior to discharge into the natural waters. Effectiveness of five major hydrodynamic separation technologies, Vortechs, Downstream Defender including Storm King for CSOs control, CDS, Stormceptor, and IHS, were evaluated in this study. There is not sufficient information for accurate evaluation of the removal efficiency for the pollutants from the stormwater runoff and CSOs. Based upon limited engineering data, however, all technologies were found to be effective in separation of heavy particles and floating solids. Technologies utilizing screens seem to have advantage in the treatment capacity than the other technologies relied fully on hydrodynamic behavior. The IHS system seems to have a strong potential in application for control of CSOs because of unique hydrodynamic behavior as well as a flexibility in opening size of the screens. Size of the particulate matter in the CSOs and stormwater runoff is found to be the most important parameter in selection of the type of the hydrodynamic separators. There exists an upper limit in the solids removal efficiency of a hydrodynamic separator, which is strongly dependent upon the particle size distribution of the CSOs and stormwater runoff.

Keywords

References

  1. Myers, C.T.J. Meek, S. Tuller and A. Weinberg (1985). Nonpoint sources of water pollution, J. Soil Water Conserv. 40(1), pp. 14-18
  2. Jefferies, C. and Ashley, R.M. (1994) Gross Solids in sewer systems-temporal and catchment based relationships. Wat. Sci. Tech., 30(1), pp. 63-71
  3. Roger B. James (1999) Solids in storm water runoff. Water Resource Management
  4. US EPA, (1999a) Preliminary Data Summary of Urban Storm Water Best Management Practices, the internet address: www.ecn.purdue.edu/runoff/ubmp/
  5. US EPA, (1999b) Combined Sewer Overflow Management Fact Sheet :Sewer Separation, EPA 832-F-99-041
  6. Sacramento Stromwater Management Program(1999). Investigation of Structural Control Measures for New Development, Final Report
  7. Sartor, J.D. and Boyd, G.B. (1972) Water Pollution Aspects of Street Surface Contaminants. EPA-R2-72-081
  8. Sansalone et., al. (1997) Characterization of Solilds Transported from an Urban Roadway Surface. WEFTEC '97
  9. Schwarz, T. and Wells, S. (1999) Storm Water Particle Removal using Cross-Flow and Sedimentation. Advances in Filtration and Separation Technology, 12, pp. 219-226
  10. Shaheen, Donald G. (1975) Contribution of Urban Roadway Usage to Water Pollution. EPA-60012-75-004
  11. Lee, S.Y. and Jago, R. (2002) Water Pollution Control Using CDS, The 3rd Conference of Environmental New Technology, pp. 103-110
  12. Vladimir N. and Harvey O. (1994) Water Quality Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution, pp. 35-43