Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology

한국목재공학회 (The Korean Society of Wood Science & Technology)
권호 표지

Comparison of Formaldehyde Emission of Wood-based Panels with Different Adhesive-hardener Combinations by Gas Chromatography and Standard Methods

  • Eom, Young Geun (Department of Forest Products, College of Forest Science, Kookmin University) ;
  • Kim, Sumin (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Major in Environmental Materials Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Baek, In-Chan (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Major in Environmental Materials Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Joong (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Major in Environmental Materials Science, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2004.12.21
  • 심사 : 2005.03.08
  • 발행 : 2005.03.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Formaldehyde emissions from wood-based panels bonded with pine and wattle tannin-based adhesives, urea-formaldehyde resin (UF), melamine-formaldehyde resin (MF), and co-polycondensed resin of urea-melamine-formaldehyde (UMF) were measured by the Japanese standard method using a desiccator (JIS A 1460) and the EN 120 (European Committee For Standardization, 1991) method using the perforator value. In formaldehyde emission, all particleboards made using the wattle tannin-based adhesive with three different hardeners, paraformaldehyde, hexamethylenetetramine, and tris(hydroxyl)nitromethan (TN), satisfied the requirements of grade $E_1$. But only those made using the pine tannin-based adhesive with the hexamine as hardener met the grade $E_1$ requirements. Hexamine was effective in reducing formaldehyde emission in tannin-based adhesives when used as the hardener. While the UF resin showed a desiccator value of $7.1mg/{\ell}$ and a perforator value of 12.1 mg/100 g, the MF resin exhibited a desiccator value of $0.6mg/{\ell}$ and a perforator value of 2.9 mg/100 g. According to the Japanese Industrial Standard and the European Standard, the formaldehyde emission level of the MDF panels made with UF resin in this study came under grade $E_2$. The formaldehyde emission level was dramatically reduced by the addition of MF resin. The desiccator and perforator methods produced proportionally equivalent results. Gas chromatography, a more sensitive and advanced method, was also used. The samples for gas chromatography were gathered during the experiment involving the perforator method. The formaldehyde contents measured by gas chromatography were directly proportional to the perforator values.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Kookmin University

참고문헌

  1. Baugh, P. J. 1993. Introduction to the theory of chromatographic separations with reference to gas chromatography. In: Gas chromatography: A practical approach. Ed. K.D. Bartle, The Practical Approach Seriese, IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-14
  2. Carlson, F. E., E. K. Phillips, S. C. Tenhaeff, and W. D. Detlefsen. 1995. Study of formaldehyde and other organic emissions from pressing of laboratory oriented strandboard. Forest Prod. J. 45: 71-77
  3. Kelly, T. J., D. L. Smith, and J. Satola. 1999. Emission rates of formaldehyde from materials and consumer products found in California homes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33: 81-88 https://doi.org/10.1021/es980592+
  4. Kim, S. and H.-J. Kim. 2003. Curing behaviors and viscoelastic properties of pine & wattle tannin-based adhesives by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis & FTlR-ATR microscopy study. J. Adh. Sci. Tech. 17: 1369-1383 https://doi.org/10.1163/156856103769172797
  5. Kim, S. and H.-J. Kim. 2004. Evaluation of formaldehyde emission of pine & wattle tannin-based adhesives by gas chromatography. Holz Roh. Werkst. 62: 101-106 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-003-0441-2
  6. Kim, S. and H.-J. Kim. 2005. Comparison of standard methods and gas chromatography method in determination of formaldehyde emission from MDF bonded with formaldehyde-based resins. Bio-resource Technol. In press
  7. Kim, S., H.-J. Kim, and Y. G. Eom. 2002. Comparison study of thermal decomposition characteristics wattle & pine tannin-based adhesives. Mokchaekonghak. 30(3): 34-41
  8. Kim, S., Y.-K. Lee, H.-J. Kim, and H. H. Lee. 2003. Physico-mechanical properties of particle-boards bonded with pine & wattle tannin-based adhesives. J. Adh. Sci. Tech. 17: 1863-1875 https://doi.org/10.1163/156856103770572025
  9. Kim, S., Y.-K. Lee, and H.-J. Kim. 2005. Thermal analysis study of viscoelastic properties and activation energy of melamine modified urea-formaldehyde resins. J. Adh. Sci. Tech. In press
  10. Lipari, F. and S. J. Swarin. 1982. Determination of formaldehyde and other aldehydes in automibile exhaust with an improved 2,4-dinitrophenyl-hydrazin method. J Chromatogr. A. 247: 297-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)85953-1
  11. Marutzky, R. 1989. Release of formaldehyde by wood products. In: Wood adhesives-Chemistry and technology. Volume 2, Ed. A. Pizzi, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 307-387
  12. Myers, G. E. 1989. Advances in methods to reduce formaldehyde emission. In: Composite board products for furniture and cabinet-innovations in manufacture and utilization. Ed. M. P. Hamel, Forest Products Society, Madison. WI
  13. Pichelin, F., C. Kamoun, and A. Pizzi. 1999. Hexamine hardener behaviour: Effects on wood glueing, tannin and other wood adhesives. Holz Roh. Werkst. 57: 305-317 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001070050349
  14. Pizzi, A. 1994. Advanced wood adhesives technology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 59-104
  15. Pizzi, A. and P. Tekely. 1994. Mechanism of polyphenolic tannin resins hardening by hexamethylenetetramine. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 56: 1645-1650 https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1995.070561215
  16. Pizzi, A., P. Tekely, and L. A. Panamgama. 1996. A different approach to low formaldehyde emission aminoplastic wood adhesives. Holz Roh. Werkst. 50: 481-485
  17. Roffael, E. 1978. Progress in the elimination of formaldehyde liberation from particleboards. In: Proceedings International Particleboard Composite Materials Symposium 12th, Washington State Univ., Pullman, Washington, pp. 233-249
  18. Roffael, E. and L. Mehlhorn. 1980. Einflu der randbedingungen bei der bestimmung des extrahierbaren formaldehyds in holzspanplatten nach der perforatormethode. Holz Roh. Werkst. 38: 85-88 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02607519
  19. Santos, F. J. and M. T. Galceran. 2002. The application of gas chromatography to environmental analysis. TrAC-Trend Anal. Chem. 21: 672-685 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00813-0
  20. Trosa, A. and A. Pizzi. 2001. A no-aldehyde emission hardener for tannin-based wood adhesives for exterior panels. Holz Roh. Werkst. 59: 266-271 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001070100200
  21. Velikonja, S. J. I., L. Zupancic-Kralj, and J. Marsel. 1995. Comparison of gas chromatographic and spectrophotometric techniques for the determination of formaldehyde in water. J. Chromatogr. A. 704: 449-454 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(95)00049-S
  22. Wolcott, J. J., W. K. Motter, N. K. Daisy, S. C. Tenhaeff, and W. D. Detlefsen. 1996. Investigation of variables affecting hot-press formaldehyde and methanol emissions during laboratory production of urea formaldehyde-bonded particleboard. Forest Prod. J. 46: 62-68