An Effect of Fluoride Recharging on Fluoride Release and Surface Change of Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials

불소방출성 수복재의 불소 재충전에 따른 불소유리와 표면변화

  • Moon, Jang-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yu, Mi-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 문장원 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 유미경 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이광원 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Published : 2005.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine an effect of fluoride recharging on fluoride release and surface change of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Six commercially available fluoride releasing restorative materials (Fuji II LC Improved: FL, Compoglass F: CF, Dyract AP: DA, F2000: FT, Gradia Direct: GD, and Tetric Ceram: TC) were selected as experimental materials. Disk specimens were fabricated with split teflon mold to the final dimensions of 15 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness. Ten samples of each material were fabricated and stored in deionized water at $37^{\circ}C{\pm}1^{\circ}C$ for 3 months. Before fluoride recharging, all specimens were polished sequentially from #800 to #2000 emery papers. Fluoride recharging was done at 5-day interval using 2.0% NaF gel. The release of fluoride into the storage water was monitored using a fluoride ion electrode. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple range test. The results obtained were summarized as follows; 1. Fluoride recharge capability were FL > CF > DA and TC group after 12 times exposure to 2.0% NaF gel (P<0.05). 2. All the experimental materials, except for FT group, showed the increase of fluoride release and surface roughness. 3. Fluoride-releasing rates returned to base line within 3 days.

Keywords

References

  1. Jensen ME, Wefel JS, Hammesfahr PD. Fluoridereleasing liners: in vitro recurrent caries. Gen Dent 39:12-17, 1991
  2. Forsten L. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odentol Scand 53:222-225, 1995 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005976
  3. Wilson AD. Developments in glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 2:438-446, 1989
  4. Bourke AM, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Light-activted glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements : the setting reaction. J Dent 20:115-120, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90118-V
  5. Mclean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials (guest editorial). Quintessence Int 25:587-589, 1994
  6. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass- ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 27:203-209, 1996
  7. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials, Biomaterials 24:2451-2461, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00638-5
  8. Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride Release from glass- ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6-month data. J of Dentistry 26:355-359, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00016-X
  9. Forsten L. Short and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomer and other fluoride containing materials in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 98:179-185, 1990
  10. Takahashi K, Emilson CF, Birkhed D. Fluoride release in vitro from various glass ionomer cements and resin composites after exposure to NaF solutions. Dent Mater 9:350-354, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90055-U
  11. DeSchepper EJ, Berr EAIII, Cailleteau JG, Tate WG. A comparative study of fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 22:215-219, 1991
  12. Karantakis, P, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, TheodoridouPahini S, Papadogiannis Y. Fluoride release from three glass ionomer cements, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent 25:20-25, 2000
  13. Diaz-Arnold AM, Helmes DC, Wistrom DW, Swift EJJr. Short-term Fluoride Release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dental Materials 11:96-101, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80041-7
  14. Attin T, Buchalla W, Siewert C, Hellwig E. Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. J Oral Rehabil 26:388-393, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00413.x
  15. Seppa L, Forss H, Ogaard B. The effect of fluoride application on fluoride release and the antibacterial action of glass ionomers. J Dent Res 72:1310-1314, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720090901
  16. Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Van Wyk Kotze TJ. A comparison of fluoride release from various dental materials. J Dent 26:259-265, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00011-0
  17. Tay W, Braden M. Fluoride ion diffusion from polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cements. Biomaterials 9:454-456, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(88)90012-9
  18. Rothwell M, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. J of Dentistry 26:591-597, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00035-3
  19. Creanor SL, Carruthers LMC, Saunders WP, Strang R, Foye RH. Fluoride uptake and release. Characteristics of glass ionomer cements. Caries Research 28:322-328, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1159/000261996
  20. Anstice HM, Nicholson JW. Studies on the setting of polyelectrolyte cements, part 2: The effect of organic compounds on a glass poly(alkenoate) cement. J Mater Sci, Materials in Medicine 5:299-302, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122400
  21. Kuramochi KI. Characteristics of fluoride-releasing restorative materials after fluoride recharging. J J Dent Mater 22:485-495, 2003