Tacrolimus versus Cyclosporine Immunosuppression in Pediatric Renal Transplantation : Pharmacokinetic Consideration

신장 이식에 사용되는 주요 면역억제제와 약물 동력학 검사

  • Kim, Jung Sue (Department of Pediatrics, Cheongju St.Mary's Hospital)
  • Received : 2005.04.19
  • Accepted : 2005.04.21
  • Published : 2005.05.15

Abstract

Immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric renal transplant recipients is changing consequence of the increasing number of available immunosuppressive agents. The optimal use of immunosuppressive agents requires a thorough understanding of the pharmacokinetic characteristics, but the information on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these drugs in pediatric transplant recipients is still limited. In general, patients younger than 5 years old show higher clearance rates, therefore the need for higher dosages in younger patients seems evident. By the therapeutic drug monitoring, trough($C_{min}$) and peak level($C_{max}$) are measured and the area under the blood concentration-time curve(AUC), which is taken as being representative of total systemic exposure can be calculated. Cyclosporine A (CSA) has poor bioavailability, which contributes to high inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability. CSA concentration measured 2 hours after administration($C_2$) has better correlation with the AUC than $C_{min}$ and is an alternative technique that predicts the AUC. Tacrolimus(Tac) has a great deal of inter-individual variability like CSA but intra-individual variability in systemic exposure is considered to be low. Both CSA and Tac are metabolized by a cytochrome P-450 enzyme isoform(CYP3A4). We should consider changing the dosages when CSA or Tac is used in combination with the medicines that inhibit or induce the CYP3A4. In case of steroid-free immunosuppressive therapy, the blood concentration of Tac should be frequently checked and dosage adjustment may be needed.

Keywords

References

  1. NARPTCS. 2002 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study(NAPRTCS). 2002, Section 3
  2. Del Mar Fernandez De Gatta M, Santos-Buelga D, Dominguez-Gil A, Garcia MJ. Immunosuppressive therapy for pediatric transplant patients: Pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002:41:115-35. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200241020-00004
  3. Filler G, Feber J. Lepage N, Weiler G, Mai I. Universal approach to pharmacokinetic monitoring of immunosuppressive agents in children. Pediatr Transplant 2002;6:411-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3046.2002.02039.x
  4. Feld LG, Stablein D, Fivush B, Harmon W, Tejani A. Renal transplantation in children from 1987-1996: The 1996 annual report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatr Transplant 1997;1:146-62
  5. Hoyer PF. Cvclosporin A(Neorai) in pediatric organ transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 1998;2:35-9
  6. Cooney GF, Habucky K, Hoppu K. Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in pediatric transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997;32:481-95 https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199732060-00004
  7. Peters DH, Fitton A, Plosker GL, Faulds D. Tacrolimus. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in hepatic and renal transplantation. Drugs 1993:46:746-94 https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199346040-00009
  8. Staatz CE, Willis C, Taylor PJ, Tett SE. Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002;72:660-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mcp.2002.129304
  9. Johnston A, David OJ, Cooney GF. Pharmacokinetic validation of neoral absorption profiling. Transplant Proc 2000;2 (suppl 3A):53S-56S
  10. Belitsky P, Levy GA, Johnston A, Levy G. Impact of absorption profiling on efficacy and safety of cyclosporine therapy in transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 39:117-25 https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200039020-00003
  11. Barama A. Sepandj F, Gough J. Mckenna R. Correlation between neoral 2 hours post-dose levels and histologic findings on surveillance biopsies. Transplant Proc 2004;36(2 suppl):465S-467S
  12. Keown P, Kahan BD, Johnston A, Levy G, Dunn SP, Cittero F, et al. Optimization of cyclosporine therapy with new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: report from the international Neoral TDM Advisory Consensus Meeting (Vancouver, November 1997). Transplant Proc 1998;30: 1645-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(98)00375-3
  13. Hoyer PF, Boekenkamp A, Vester U, Offner G, Brodehl J. Conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral and induction therapy with Neoral in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 1996;28:2259-61
  14. Shaw LM, Holt DW, Keown P, Venkataramanan R, Yatscoff RW. Current opinions on therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs. Clin Ther 1999;21:1632-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(99)80044-7
  15. Halloran PF. Molecular mechanisms of new immunosuppressants. Clin Transplant 1996;10:118-23
  16. Ellis D, Shapiro R, Jordan ML, Scantlebury VP, Gilboa N, Hopp L, et al. Comparison of FK -506 and cyclosporine regimens in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 1994;8:193-200 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00865477
  17. Cacciarelli TV, Green M, Jaffe R, Mazariegos GV, Jain A, Fung JJ, et al. Management of posttransplant lymphopro!iferative disease in pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving primary tacrolimus(FK506) therapy. Transplantation 1998;66:1047-52 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199810270-00014
  18. Filler G, Grygas R, Mai I, Stolpe HJ, Greiner C, Bauer S, et al. Pharmacokinetic of tacrolirnus(FK-506) in children and adolescents with renal transplants. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997;12:1668-71 https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/12.8.1668
  19. Shishido S, Asanuma H, Tajima E, Honda M, Nakai H. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2001;33:1066-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(00)02418-0
  20. Undre NA. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus-based combination therapies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18(suppl 1): i12-i15 https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfg1029
  21. Webb NJA, Stevenson PJ, Lewis MA, Postiethwaite RJ, Bradbury MG, Undre NA. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2002;34:1948-1950 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(02)03133-0
  22. Kim JS, Aviles DH, Silverstein DM, LeBlanc PL, Vehas kari VM. Effect of age, ethnicity, and glucocorticoid use on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant patients. Pediatr Transplant 2005(in press)
  23. Knoll GA, Bell RC. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for immunosuppression in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMJ 1999;318:1104-7 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7191.1104
  24. Tonshoff B, Mehls O. Factors affecting growth and strategies for treatment in children after renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 1997;1 :176-82
  25. Sanchez CP, Salusky I, Kuizou B, Ramirez JA, Gates B, Ettenger RB, et al. Bone disease in children and adolescents undergoing successful renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1998;53:1358-64 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00866.x
  26. Dunn TB, Asolati M, Holman DM, Raofi V, Jovanovic B, Pollak R, et al. Long-term outcomes of a prospective trial of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation. Surgery 1999;125:155-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70259-X
  27. Maiorca R, Cristinelli L, Brunori G, Setti G, Salemi B, De Nobili U, et al. Prospective controlled trial of steroid withdrawal after six months in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporin. Transplant Proc 1988;20(suppl 3):121-5
  28. Ratcliffe PJ, Dudley CR, Higgins RM, Firth JD, Smith B, Morris PJ Randomized controlled trial of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients receiving triple immunosuppression. Lancet 1996;348:643-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02510-X
  29. Chakrabarti P, Wong HY, Scantlebury VP, Jordan ML, Vivas C, Ellis D, et al. Outcome after steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplantation patients receiving tacrolimusbased immunosuppression. Transplantation 2000;70:760-4 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200009150-00008
  30. Sarwal MM, Vidhun J, Alexander SR, Satterwhite T, MilIan M, Salvatierra O Jr. Continued superior outcomes with modification and lengthened follow-up of a steroid-avoidance pilot with extended daclizumab induction in pediatric renal transplantation. Transplantation 2003;76:1331-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TP.0000092950.54184.67