DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of In ovo Injection of Critical Amino Acids on Pre- and Post-hatch Growth, Immunocompetence and Development of Digestive Organs in Broiler Chickens

  • Bhanja, S.K. (Central Avian Research Institute) ;
  • Mandal, A.B. (Central Avian Research Institute)
  • Received : 2004.06.17
  • Accepted : 2004.11.09
  • Published : 2005.04.01

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to standardize in ovo injection of amino acids (AA) and to evaluate the effect of in ovo injection of limiting AA(s) on pre and post hatch growth performance, immune response and development of digestive organs. Combinations of essential and non-essential amino acids (Lys+Arg, Lys+Met+Cys, Thr+Gly+Ser, Ile+Leu+Val and Gly+Pro) were injected into 50 eggs in each treatment group at 14 d of embryonic age. Standardization of injection site, needle length and embryonic age revealed that when AA were injected in to the broad end of the egg with a 11 mm needle and at the narrow end with a 24 mm needle both at the 7$^{th}$ and 14$^{th}$ d of incubation there was poor hatchability. However, better hatchability was recorded when the AA were injected in the narrow end of the egg with a 11 mm needle and in the broad end with a 24 mm needle on the 14$^{th}$ d of incubation. The chick to egg weight ratio was higher (p<0.018) when AA were injected on the 14$^{th}$ d of incubation. When a combination of amino acids were injected a 63.6 or 63.2 g difference in body weight of bird at 21 d was recorded between uninjected control and Ile+Leu+Val or Gly+Pro group, respectively. Higher feed intake (p<0.047) was recorded in the AA injected groups and feed conversion ratio (FCR) was numerically better in Gly+Pro, Lys+Met+Cys AA injected groups than in the uninjected control. Significantly higher immune response to cell mediated (p<0.033) and humoral (p<0.002) immunity was observed in in ovo amino acid injected birds, especially in Lys+Met+Cys, Thr+Gly+Ser or Ile+leu+Val groups. The digestive organ weights at 21 d did not differ between specific AA injected groups and the uninjected control. In ovo injected amino acids may act as immunomodulators and their role in gastrointestinal development needs further research.

Keywords

References

  1. Al- Murrani, W. K. 1982. Effect of injecting amino acids into the egg on embryonic and subsequent growth in the domestic fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 23:171-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071688208447943
  2. Bertolo, F. P., C. Z. I. Chen, G. Law, P. B. Pencharz and R. O. Ball. 1998. Threonine requirement of neonatal piglets receiving total parental nutrition is considerably lower than that of piglets receiving an ideal diet intragastrically. J. Nutr. 128:1752-1758.
  3. Bhanja, S. K. 2003. Feasibility of in ovo amino acid injection for embryonic growth and optimizing total and digestible amino acid requirements for meat production and immunocompetence of broiler chickens. Ph.D.Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Deemed University, Izatnagar, 243 122, India.
  4. Bhargava, K. K., R. P. Hanson and M. L. Sunde. 1970. Effect of methionine and valine on antibody production in chickens infected with Newcastle disease virus. J. Nutr. 100:241-248.
  5. Bhargava, K. K., R. P. Hanson and M. L. Sunde. 1971. Effect of threonine on growth and antibody production in chickens infected with Newcastle disease virus. Poult. Sci. 50:710-713.
  6. Block, R. J., K. W. Weiss and D. B. Cornett. 1966. The amino acid composition of proteins. In: The amino acid composition of proteins and foods (Ed. R. J. Block and D. Bolling). Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, IL Pages 149-225.
  7. Brierley, J. and W. A. Hemmings. 1956. The selective transport of antibodies from the yolk sac to the circulation of the chick. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 4:34-41.
  8. Coles, B. A., J. Croom, L. R. Daniel, V. I. Christensen and E. J. Eisen. 2001. In ovo peptide YY administration improves body weight at hatch and day 3 in turkey poults. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 10:380-384.
  9. Corrier, D. E. and J. R. Deloach. 1990. Evaluation of cell mediated, cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity in young chickens by interdigital skin test. Poult. Sci. 69:403-408.
  10. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11:1-42.
  11. Ferket, P. R. and Uni, Zehava. 2002. Early enteric development of turkeys. Proceedings of the 25th technical turkey conference held at the Shrigley Hall Hotel on 24-26 April, 2002, pp. 59-64.
  12. Harvey, W. R. 1975. Least square analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. Agric Research Service, United State, Dept. of Agriculture.
  13. Kidd, M. T., E. D. Peebles, S. K. Whitmarsh, J. B. Yeatman and R. F. Wideman Jr. 2001. Growth and immunity of broiler chicks as affected by dietary arginine. Poult. Sci. 80:1535-1542.
  14. Konashi, S., K. Takahashi and Y. Akiba. 2000. Effect of dietary essential amino acid deficiency on immunological variables in broiler chickens. Br. J. Nutr. 83:449-456.
  15. Losch, U., I. Schranner, R. Wanke and L. Jurgens. 1986. The chicken egg, an antibody source. J. Vet. Med. 33:609-619.
  16. Lotan, R., S. Mokady and L. Horenstein. 1980. The effect of lysine and threonine supplementation on the immune response of growing rat fed wheat gluten diets. Nutr. Rep. Int. 22:313-318.
  17. Mandal, A. B., A. V. Elangovan and T. S. Johri. 2004. Comparing Bio-efficacy of liquid Dl-methionine hydroxy analogue free acid with Dl-methionine in broiler chickens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:102-108.
  18. National Research Council 1994. Nutrients requirements of poultry, 8th revised ed., Washington, DC, USA, National Academy Press.
  19. Ohta, Y. and M. T. Kidd. 2001. Optimum site for in ovo amino acid injection in broiler breeder eggs. Poult. Sci. 80:1425-1429.
  20. Ohta, Y., N. Tsushima, K. Koide, M. T. Kidd and T. Ishibashi. 1999. Effect of amino acid injection in broiler breeder eggs on embryonic growth and hatchability of chicks. Poult. Sci. 78:1493-1498.
  21. Ohta, Y., M. T. Kidd and T. Ishibashi. 2001. Embryo growth and amino acid concentration profiles of broiler breeder eggs, embryos and chicks after in ovo administration of amino acids. Poult. Sci. 80:1430-1436.
  22. Ohta, Y., T. Yoshida, N. Tsushima and M. T. Kidd. 2002. The needle bore diameter for in ovo amino acid injection has no effect on hatching performance in broiler breeder eggs. Jap. Poult. Sci. 39:194-197.
  23. Siegel, P. B. and W. B. Gross. 1980. Production and persistency of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. 1. Directional selection. Poult. Sci. 59:1-5.
  24. Stoll, B., J. Henry, P. J. Reeds, H. YU, E. Jahoor and D. G. Burrin. 1998. Catabolism dominates the first pass intestinal metabolism of dietary essential amino acids in milk protein-fed piglets. J. Nutr. 128:606-614.
  25. Swain, B. K. and T. S. Johri. 2000. Effect of supplemental methionine, choline and their combination on the performance and immune response of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:83-88.
  26. Tenenhouse, H. W. and H. F. Deutsch. 1966. Some physicalchemical properties of chicken gamma globulins and their pepsin and papain digestion products. Immunochemistry, 3:11-20.
  27. Tsiagbe, V. K., M. E. Good, A. E. Harper and M. L. Sunde. 1987. Enhanced immune response in broiler chickens fed methionine supplemented diets. Poult. Sci. 66:1147-1154.
  28. Van der Zijpp, A. J. 1983. The effect of genetic origin, source of antigen and dose of antigen on the immune response of cockerels. Poult. Sci. 62:205-211. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0620205
  29. Venerando, R., G. Mitto, M. Kadowaski, N. Siliprandi and G. E. Mortimore. 1994. Multiphasic control of proteolysis by leucine and alanine in isolated rat hepatocyte. Am. J. Physiol. 266:C455-C461.
  30. Yang, S. I., T. Muramatsu, I. Tasaki and J. Okumura. 1989. Responses of pancreatic digestive enzyme secretion to amino acids, glucose and cholecystokinin in chicks. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 92a:319-322.

Cited by

  1. carbohydrate supplementation modulates growth and immunity-related genes in broiler chickens vol.99, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12193
  2. on digestive organ developments and subsequent growth performance of broiler chickens vol.100, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12400
  3. Effect of in ovo injection of threonine on immunoglobulin A gene expression in the intestine of Japanese quail at hatch vol.101, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12543
  4. The Effects of In-Ovo Injection of Propolis on Egg Hatchability and Starter Live Performance of Japanese Quails vol.18, pp.spe2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0198
  5. Effects of in ovo feeding of cationic amino acids on hatchability, hatch weights, and organ developments in domestic pigeon squabs (Columba livia) vol.97, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex260
  6. -arginine regulates intestinal barrier functions of posthatch broilers by activating the mTOR signaling pathway pp.00225142, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8609
  7. injection of nutrients on the hatchability indices, post-hatch growth, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio and immunocompetence traits of turkey poults vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1296843
  8. In Ovo Administration of Silver Nanoparticles and/or Amino Acids Influence Metabolism and Immune Gene Expression in Chicken Embryos vol.16, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16059484
  9. Effects of in ovo injection of lysine and methionine into fertile broiler (parent stock) eggs on hatchability, growth performance, caecum microbiota, and ileum histomorphology vol.47, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720170220
  10. Effects of intra-yolk-sac injection of dextrose and albumin on performance, jejunum morphology, liver and pectoral muscle glycogen and some serum metabolites of broilers vol.102, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12882
  11. Validating the current amino acid and energy requirements of coloured broiler chickens vol.87, pp.11, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2976
  12. supplementation on immune responses and some serum biochemical attributes in broiler chickens pp.1828-051X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2018.1529545
  13. Effect of graded levels of soapnut (Sapindus mukorossi) shell powder on reproductive performance in broiler breeders vol.32, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0353
  14. delivery of various biological supplements, vaccines and drugs in poultry: current knowledge pp.00225142, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9593
  15. Effect of in ovo threonine supplementation on early growth, immunological responses and digestive enzyme activities in broiler chickens vol.49, pp.6, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802469333
  16. Changes to daily feed intake during the laying period alters embryonicMSTNandMYOGgene expression in genetically fat and lean lines of chickens vol.54, pp.6, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.853868
  17. Applications of In Ovo Technique for the Optimal Development of the Gastrointestinal Tract and the Potential Influence on the Establishment of Its Microbiome in Poultry vol.3, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00063
  18. Effects of in ovo injection of threonine on hatchability, intestinal morphology, and somatic attributes in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) vol.45, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1206902
  19. Early Nutrition Programming ( in ovo and Post-hatch Feeding) as a Strategy to Modulate Gut Health of Poultry vol.6, pp.None, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00082
  20. 부화 전후 영양, 부화 후 유지시간, 그리고 In Ovo Feeding vol.46, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2019.46.1.1
  21. Effect of In Ovo Injection of L-Arginine in Different Chicken Embryonic Development Stages on Post-Hatchability, Immune Response, and Myo-D and Myogenin Proteins vol.9, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060357
  22. Time of sexual maturity and early egg quality of Japanese quails affected by in ovo injection of medicinal plants vol.62, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-62-423-2019
  23. Does in Ovo Injection of Two Chicken Strains with Royal Jelly Impact Hatchability, Post-Hatch Growth Performance and Haematological and Immunological Parameters in Hatched Chicks? vol.9, pp.8, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080486
  24. Factors affecting chick quality in Poland vol.75, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043933919000618
  25. Performance, intestinal morphometry, and incubation parameters of broiler chickens submitted to in ovo feeding with different techniques and amino acids vol.99, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2018-0131
  26. Fecal Metabolites Were Altered, Identified as Biomarkers and Correlated With Disease Activity in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a GC-MS-Based Metabolomics Study vol.11, pp.None, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.02138
  27. Insight View on the Role of in Ovo Feeding of Clenbuterol on Hatched Chicks: Hatchability, Growth Efficiency, Serum Metabolic Profile, Muscle, and Lipid-Related Markers vol.11, pp.8, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082429