Airway Improvement After Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture

비골 골절 정복 후 비강 내 기도 폐색의 개선

  • Kim, Sang-Bum (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Seung-Kyu (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Kyung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 김상범 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 한승규 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김우경 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2004.08.23
  • Published : 2005.01.10

Abstract

Evaluations and treatments of nasal bone fracture have been mainly focused on aesthetic aspect, but nose has an important role as an airway. The purpose of this study was evaluation of nasal bone fractures in the view of nasal obstruction and its improvement after reduction. Acoustic rhinometry was applied to the 77 nasal bone fractured patients who received closed reduction from August 2002 to July 2003 and received closed reduction. This was tested twice, before and 6 days after reduction, for all 77 patients and additional acoustic rhinometry was also possible in 26 patients after 6 months. The analysis of acoustic rhinometry were based on data of minimal cross-sectional area(MCA) according to fracture sites(one side, both side and tip) and septal displacement. Mean MCA for all cases before reduction was $0.43{\pm}0.21cm^2$, which was 19% decrease compared to normal adult data($0.53{\pm}0.12cm^2$). Depending on fracture sites the MCA were $0.45{\pm}0.16cm^2$ for one side fracture, $0.35{\pm}0.18cm^2$ for both side fracture, and $0.42{\pm}0.25cm^2$ for tip fracture. The patients with septal displacement showed more severe obstruction than ones without septal displacement, $0.26{\pm}0.26cm^2$ and $0.46{\pm}0.10cm^2$, respectively. The MCA was improved up to $0.50{\pm}0.22cm^2$ after reduction and showed slight decrease after 6 month($0.48{\pm}0.23cm^2$). Based on the results of this study, nasal bone fracture really caused airway obstruction(19% decrease). Both side fracture showed more profound decrease than one side fracture and septal displacement was an important parameter which causes nasal obstruction. Closed reduction improved MCA by 14% right after reduction, and 11% after 6 month follow up.

Keywords

References

  1. Min YK: Clinical rhinology. 1st ed, Seoul, Iljogak, 2001, p 73
  2. Santiago-Diez de Bonilla J, McCaffrey TV, Kern EB: The nasal valve: a rhinornanometric evaluation of maximum nasal inspiratory flow and pressure curves. Ann Otol Rhinal Laryngol 95: 229, 1986
  3. Rivron RP, Sanderson RJ: The voluntary control of nasal airway resistance. Rhinology 29: 181, 1991
  4. Ognibene NE, merrick MA, Ingersoll CD: Intra-and intersession reliability of acoustic rhinometry in measuring nasal cross-sectional area. Ear Nose Throat J 80: 536, 2001
  5. Hilberg O: Objective measurement of nasal airway dimension using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. Allergy 57: 5, 2002