DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sexual and Males Dimorphism of Rhinogobius brunneus (Pisces: Gobiidae)

밀어, Rhinogobius brunneus (Pisces: Gobiidae)의 성적 이형 및 수컷의 이형

  • Song, Ho-Bok (Division of Life Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Baek, Hyun-Min (Division of Life Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Son, Yeong-Mok (Department of Science Education, Seowon University)
  • 송호복 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학부) ;
  • 백현민 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학부) ;
  • 손영목 (서원대학교 사범대학 과학교육과)
  • Published : 2005.10.31

Abstract

The sexual dimorphism and intra sexual dimorphism in males of Rhinogobius brunneus were investigated at Jiam stream, a tributary of the Bukhan river from May, 2005. The frequency distributions in standard length were similar for the females and maleLs, but maleSs were smaller than the females and maleLs. The ratio of MaleL (N=79) to males (N=79) was 1 : 0.46. The comparison between female (N=79) and maleL (N=79) gave significant differences (P<0.05) in 18 morphometric characteristics (SNL, AHD, PHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, ED, HL, FDFL, SDFB, CFL, AFB, VFL, PFL, PFB) and 12 characteristics (SNL, AHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, HL, FDFI, CFL, PFB) (P<0.001). Eight morphometric characteristics (SNL, ML, DL, MW, HL, CFL, VFL, PFL) in female (N=36) and males (N=36) had significant differences (P<0.05) and three characteristics (ML, DL, HL) had very significant differences (P<0.001). Eleven characteristics (SNL, AHD, PHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, HL, FDFL) were significantly different in maleL (N=36) and males (N=36) (P<0.05) and six (ML, DL, MW, AHW, HL, FDFL) were very significantly different (P<0.001).

밀어의 성적 이형과 수컷 사이의 이형에 대하여, 2005년 5월에 강원도 춘천시 서면 오월리의 지암천에서 채집한 개체군을 대상으로 조사한 결과는 다음과 같다. Female과 maleL의 체장 분포와 성비는 거의 유사하였으나 males는 40 mm이하의 개체들이 대부분으로 female과 maleL에 비하여 소형 개체들이었으며, maleL : maleS의 비는 1 : 0.46이었다. Female(N=79)과 maleL(N=79)의 계측형질 중 18개 형질(SNL, AHD, PHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, ED, HL, FDFL, SDFB, CFL, AFB, VFL, PFL, PFB)에서 유의한 차이(P<0.05)가 인정되었으며, 이들 중 SNL, AHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, HL, FDFL, CFL, PFB 등 12개 형질은 현저한 차이(P<0.001)를 나타내었다. Female(N=36)과 maleS(N=36)의 비교 결과 8개 형질(SNL, ML, DL, MW, HL, CR, VFL, PFL)에서 유의한 차이(P<0.05)가 인정되었으며, 이들중 ML, DL, HL 등 3개의 측정 형질에서는 현저한 차이(P<0.001)가 있었다. Male(N=36)과 maleS(N=36)의 측정 형질 중 SNL, AHD, PHD, ML, DL, MW, AHW, IFW, PHW, HL, FDFL 등 모두 11개 형질에서 유의한 차이(P<0.05)가 인정되었으며, 11개 형질 중 ML., DL, MW, AHW, HL, FDFL 등 6개 형질은 큰 차이(P<0.001)가 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersson, M. 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widow bird. Nature 229: 818-820
  2. Andersson, M. 1984. The evolution of eusociality. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 165-189 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.15.1.165
  3. Bisazza, A. and A. Marconato. 1988. Female mate choice, male-male competition and parental care in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Animal Behaviour 36: 1352-1360 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80204-5
  4. Bygott, J.D., B.C.R. Bertram and J.P. Hanby. 1979. Mail lions in large coalitions gain reproductive advantage. Nature 282: 839-841 https://doi.org/10.1038/282839a0
  5. Catchpole, C.K., J. Dittami and B. Leisler. 1984. Differential responses to male song repertoires in female songbirds implanted with oestradiol. Nature 312: 563-564 https://doi.org/10.1038/312563a0
  6. Cummins, K.W. 1962. An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special on lotic waters. Amer. Midl. Natl. 67: 477-504 https://doi.org/10.2307/2422722
  7. Darling, F.F. 1937. A Herd of Red Deer. Oxford Univ. Press
  8. Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. L. Murray, London
  9. Dominey, W.J. 1980. Female mimicry in male bluegill sunfish - a genetic polymorphism? Nature 284: 546-548 https://doi.org/10.1038/284546a0
  10. Fisher, R.A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Dover, New York
  11. Geist, V. 1974. On fighting strategies in animal conflict. Nature 250:354
  12. Gross, M.R. 1982. Sneakers, satellites, and parentals: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. Z. Tierpsychol. 60: 1-26
  13. Gross, M.R. 1985. Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature 313: 47-48 https://doi.org/10.1038/313047a0
  14. Houde, A.E. and J.A. Endler. 1990. Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male colour patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248: 1405-1408 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.248.4961.1405
  15. Huxley, J.S. 1966. A discussion of ritualisation of behaviour in animal and man: introduction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 251: 247-271
  16. Ito, S and Y. Yanagisawa. 2000. Mate choice and cannibalism in a natural population of a stream goby, Rhinogobius sp. Ichthyological Research 47: 51-58 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02674313
  17. Jakobsson, S., T. Radesäter and T. Järvi. 1979. On the fighting behaviour of Nannacara anomala (Pices, Cichlidae) males. Z. Tierpsychol. 49: 210-220 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00288.x
  18. Jeon, S.R. and Y. Aonuma. 1995. Studies on the key and distribution of the Genus Rhinogobius (Pisces: Gobiidae) from Korea. Sang Myung Women's Univ. J. Natural Sci. 2: 1-32
  19. Jones, J.A. 1959. The Salmon. Collins, London
  20. Kim, I.S., Y. Choi, C.L. Lee, Y.J. Lee, B.J. Kim and J.H. Kim. 2005. Illustrated Book of Korean Fishes. Kyohaksa, Seoul. pp. 420-445
  21. Kim, J.B., J.H. Kim and S.Y. Yang. 1997. Systematic studies on the freshwater goby, Rhinogobius species (Perciformes, Gobiidae) III. Geographic variation and subspecific differentiation in Rhinogobius giurinus, with a comment on genetic relationships among four species of the genus Rhinogobius. Korean J. Biol. Sci. 1: 529-534
  22. Kim, J.B. and S.Y. Yang. 1996. Systematic studies on the freshwater goby, Rhinogobius species (Perciformes, Gobiidae), II. Geographic distribution and taxonomic status of three color types in the Rhinogobius brunneus complex from South Korea. Korean J. Systematic Zoology 12: 331-347
  23. Krebs, J.R. and N.B. Davies. 2004. Behavioural Ecology, an Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell, Oxford
  24. Lank, D.B. and C.M. Smith. 1987. Conditional lekking in ruff (Philomachus pugnax). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 137-145 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572636
  25. Masuda, Y., T. Ozawa and S. Egami. 1989. Genetic differentiation among eight color types of the freshwater goby, Rhinogobius brunneus, from western Japan. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 36: 30-41
  26. Maekawa, K. and H. Onozato. 1986. Reprodictive tactics and fertilization success of mature male miyabe charr, Salvelinus malma miyabei. Environ. Biol. Fish. 15: 119-129 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005427
  27. Noonan, K. 1983. Female mate choice in the cichlid fish Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Animal Behaviour 31: 321-329
  28. Okuda, N., S. Ito and H. Iwao. 2003. Female mimicry in a freshwater goby Rhinogobius sp. OR. Ichthyol. Biol. 50: 198-200
  29. Parker, G.A. 1974. Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol. 47: 223-243 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8
  30. Petrie, M., T. Halliday and C. Sanders. 1991. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Animal Behaviour 41: 323-331 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80484-1
  31. Ryan, M.J., M.D. Tuttle and A.S. Rand. 1982. Bat predation and sexual advertisement in a neotropical anuran. Amer. Natur. 119: 136-139 https://doi.org/10.1086/283899
  32. Sinclair, A.R.E. 1977. The African Buffalo. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago
  33. Song, H.B. 2000. Population ecology of fat minnow, Rhynchocypris kumgangensis (Cyprinidae) in Korea. Kor. J. Ichthyol. 12: 101-110
  34. Song, H.B. and Y.M. Son. 2002. Maturity and reproductive ecology of the minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus (Cyprinidae) in the upper South Han River, Korea. Kor. J. Ichthyol. 14: 262-268
  35. Suk, H.Y. and J.C. Choe. 2002. Females prefer males with larger first dorsal fins in the common freshwater goby. J. Fish Biol. 61: 899-914 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01851.x
  36. Takahashi, D. and M. Kohda. 2004. Courtship in fast water currents by a male stream goby (Rhinogobius brunneus) communicates the parental quality honestly. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 431-438 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0693-1
  37. Tzeng, C.S. 1986. The Freshwater Fishes of Taiwan. Taiwan Prov. Educ. Press. pp. 66-69
  38. van Rhijn, J.G. 1983. On the maintenance and origin of the alternative strategies in the ruff Philomachus pugnax. Ibis. 125: 482-498 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1983.tb03143.x
  39. Wells, K.D. 1977. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour 25: 666-693 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90118-X
  40. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J. theor. Biol. 67: 603-605 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(77)90061-3
  41. Zheng, M. and H. Wu. 1985. A study on the freshwater Gobiidae fishes of Zhejiang province, China, with description of two new species (Perciformes: Gobiidae). Acta Zootax. Sinica 10: 326-332

Cited by

  1. Sexual Dimorphism of Damselfish, Chromis notata in Spawning Season vol.30, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2018.06.30.3.830