Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Semantic Relationships in Knowledge Organization Systems

지식조직체계의 용어관계 유형에 관한 연구

  • 백지원 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 정연경 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2005.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and systematize the semantic relationships in knowledge organization systems(KOS) . For this purpose, Classification systems, thesaurus, subject headings, semantic networks, ontology, databases were analyzed in terms of the semantic relationships between terms. Also, various kinds of the terminological relationships not only in the current KOS but in the theoretical researches were collected and analyzed. In addition, six proposals were suggested for the organized system of the terminological relationships for the future uses.

본 연구는 현행의 용어관계가 가진 문제점을 파악하기 위하여 용어관계의 다양한 사례를 조사 분석하고 이를 바탕으로 용어관계를 체계화하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 용어관계가 기반이 되는 분류, 시소러스, 주제명표목을 비롯하여 의미망, 온톨로지, 데이터베이스 등 기존의 여러 지식조직체계를 용어관계의 측면에서 재조명하여 그 특성 및 상호관계를 파악하였다. 또한 이들 지식조직체계에 실질적으로 나타나는 각종 용어관계의 사례와 용어관계에 대한 연구들을 광범위하게 수집하여 다양한 용어관계의 유형을 파악하였다. 이렇게 수집된 다양한 용어관계를 분석하여 실재하는 용어관계의 체계화 방안을 모색하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김광해. 1990. 어휘소간의 의미 관계에 대한 재검토. '국어학', 20: 28-46
  2. 이재윤, 김태수. 1999. WordNet과 시소러스. '언어정보의 탐구', 1: 232-269
  3. 임지룡. 1992. '국어 의미론'. 서울: 탑출판사.
  4. 최석두. 2002. '한글 시소러스의 구축 기준에 관한 연구'. 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과
  5. 한국문화예술진흥원. 1994. '시소러스 개발을 위한 프레임웍'. 서울: 한국문화예술진흥원
  6. 한상길. 1999. '시소러스 용어관계의 확장에 관한 연구'. 박사학위논문, 중앙대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과
  7. Aitchison, Jean, Alan Gilchrist, and David Bawden. 2000. Thesaurus Constru ction and Use : a Practical Manual. 4th ed. London: Aslib
  8. Aitchison, Jean. 1970. 'Thesaurofacet: a multipurpose retrievallanguage tool. 'Journal of Documentation, 26(3): 187- 203 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026493
  9. Alonge, A., Nicoletta Calzolari, Piek Vossen, Laura Bloksma, Irene
  10. American Library Association, Subject Analysis Committee, Subcommittee on Subject relationships / Reference Structures 1999. Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee. [cited 2004. 4. 6].
  11. Barhydt, C., T. Schmidt, and K. T. Chang. 1968. Information retrieval thesaurus of educational terms. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University
  12. Castellon, Maria Antonia Marti, and Wim Peters. 1998. 'Design of the Euro- WordNet database.' In Eurowordnet: A Multilingual Database With Lexical Semantic Networks. edited by Piek Vossen. Dordrecht: The Kluwer Academic Publishers
  13. Dong Zhendong and Qiang Dong. 2005. HowNet. [cited 2005. 1. 12].
  14. El-Hoshy, Lynn M. 2001. 'Relationships in Library of Congress Subject He adings.' In Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, edited by Carol A. Bean and Rebecca Green, 135-152. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
  15. Foskett, A. C. 1996. The Subject Approach to Information. 5th ed, London: Library Association Pub
  16. Gilchrist, Alan. 2003. 'Thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies -- an etymological note.' Journal of Documentation, 59 (1): 7-18 https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310457984
  17. ISO 2788-1986(E). International Organization for Standardization Documntati on: Guidelines for the Establishment and Development of Monolingual Thes auri. 2nd ed
  18. ISO 5127-2001. Information and Documentation -- Vocabulary
  19. ISO CD 12620:2003 (Part 2) Terminology and other language resources -- Data Categories -- Part 2: Data Categories for Terminological Resources
  20. ISO/DIS 12620:1999 Computer Applications in Terminology -- Data Categories
  21. KS C 5886: 1993. 한국공업규격 도큐멘테이션 용어(기본개념)
  22. Lancaster, F. W. 1986. Vocabulary Control for Information Retrieval. 2nd ed. Arlington: Information Resources Press
  23. Lu, X. 1990. 'Document retrieval: a structural approach.' Information Process ing & Management, 26(2): 209-218 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90026-X
  24. Maniez, J. 1988. 'Relationships in thesauri: some critical remarks,' Internati onal Classification, 15(3): 133-138
  25. Miller, G., R. Beckwith, C. Felbaum, D Gross and K. Miller. 199 0 . 'Introduction to WordNet: an online lexical database.' International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4): 302-312 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/3.4.302
  26. Mitchell, Joan S. 2001. 'Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification System.' In Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, edited by Carol A. Bean and Rebecca Green, 211-226. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
  27. National Information Standards Organization. 1993. ANSI/NISO Z39.19-1993. Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Thesauri
  28. National Information Standards Organization. 2005. ANSI/NISO Z39.19-200X. Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies
  29. National Library of Medicine. 2005. 2005AA UMLS Documentation. [cited 2005. 2. 25].
  30. Neelameghan, A. 2001. 'Lateral relationships in multicultural, multilingual databases in the spiritual and religious domains: the OM InformationService.' In Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, edited by Carol A. Bean and Rebecca Green, 185-198. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
  31. Perreault, Jean. 1994. 'Categories and relators: a new schema.' Knowledge Organization, 21(4): 189-198
  32. Rosenfeld, Louis and Peter Morville. 2002. Information Architecture for the World Wide Web. 2nd ed. California: O'Reilly & Associates
  33. Schmitz-Esser, W. 1999. 'Thesaurus and beyond: an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval.' Knowledge Organization, 26(1): 10-22
  34. Scibor, E. and E. Jabryemska. 1985. 'Thesaurus of common topics(TCT): origin, functions, structure.' Information Processing & Management, 21(1): 5-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(85)90123-2
  35. Storey, Veda C. 1993. 'Understanding semantic relationships.' VLDB Journal, 2: 455- 488 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263048
  36. Thacker, Sanjeev, Amit Sheth and Shychi Patel. 2003. 'Complex relationships for the semantic web.' In Spinning the semantic web. edited by Fensel, D., J. Hendler, H. Lieberman, and W. Wahlster. The MIT Press
  37. Wang, Yih-Chen, James Vandendorpe, Martha Evens. 1985. 'Relational thesauri in information retrieval.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(1): 15-27 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360102
  38. Vossen, Piek ed. 2004. EuroWordNet General Document. Version 3. Final. [cited 2004. 3. 5]
  39. Willetts, M. 1975. 'An investigation of the nature of the relation between terms in thesauri.' Journal of Documentation, 31(3): 158-184 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026599