DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

COMPATIBILITY OF SELF-ETCHING DENTIN ADHESIVES WITH RESIN LUTING CEMENTS

자가부식형 상아질접착제와 레진시멘트와의 적합성에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Do-Wan (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Kyoung-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
  • 김도완 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박상진 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최경규 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2005.11.01

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the compatibility between 4 dentin adhesives and 4 resin luting cements. Dentin adhesives used in this study were All-Bond 2 (Bisco Inc., Schaumbrug, IL, USA), Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Medical Inc, Osaka, Japan), Prompt L-Pop (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA), One-Up Bond F (Tokuyama corp., Tokyo, Japan) Resin luting cements used in this study were Choice (Bisco Inc., Schaumbrug, IL, USA), Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc, Osaka, Japan), RelyX ARC (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA) Bistite II DC (Tokuyama corp., Tokyo, Japan). Combination of each dentin adhesive and corresponding resin cement was made to 16 experimental groups. Flat dentin surfaces was created on mid-coronal dentin of extracted mandibular third molars, then dentin surface was polished with 320-grit silicon carbide abrasive papers. Indirect resin composite block (Tescera, Bisco) was fabricated. Its surface for bonding to tooth was polished with silicon carbide abrasive papers Each dentin adhesive was treated on tooth surface and resin composite overlay were luted with each resin cement. Each bonded specimen was poured in epoxy resin and sectioned occluso-gingivally into 1.0mm thick slab, then further sectioned into $1.0{\times}1.0mm^2$ composite-dentin beams. Microtensile bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 1.0mm/min. The data were analysed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple comparison tests The results of this study were as follows, 2-step self-etching dentin adhesive which has additional bonding resin is more comparison than tests. self-etching dentin adhesive.

본 연구는 상아질 접착제와 레진 시멘트의 적합성 여부를 알아보고자 시행하였다. 발거한 제3대구치의 상아질 표면을 노출시킨 후 Tescera ATL 복합레진 시편을 상아질 접착제 [All Bond 2 (Bisco), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), Adper Prompt L-POP (3M), One-Up Bond F (Tokuyama)]와 레진시멘트 [Choice (Bisco), Panavia F (Kuraray), RelyX ARC (3M), Bistite II DC (Tokuyama)]로 접착하고 미세인장 결합강도 및 주사전자 현미경 관찰을 시행한 결론은 다음과 같다. 1. Clearfil SE Bond와 All-Bond 2가 Prompt L-Pop과 One-Up Bond F 보다 높은 미세인장 결합강도를 보였다(p<0.05). 2. Clearfil SE Bond와 All-Bond 2 사용시 1-step 상아질 접착제보다 혼성층이 두껍고 레진 tag가 길었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Manhart J, Scheibenhogen FA, Chen HY, Hiekel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Invest 4:192-198, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840000086
  2. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain Veneers; a review of the literature. J Dent 28:163-177, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4
  3. Mitchell CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coveraged crowns. Dent Mater 16:198-206, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00009-9
  4. Knox J, Kralj B, Hubsch PF, Middleton J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the influence of orthodontic adhesive on the stresses generated in a bonded bracket finite element model. Am J Ortho Dent Orthop 119:43-53, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.110987
  5. el-Mowafy O, Rubo MH. Retention of a posterior resinbonded fixed partial denture with a modified design : an in vitro study. Int J Prosthod 13:425-431, 2000
  6. Platt JA. Resin cements into the 21st century. Comp Cont Edue Dent 20:1173-1188, 1999
  7. Dias-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 81:135-141, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70240-4
  8. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 33:213-224, 2002
  9. Choi KK, Kim SW, Choi HY. Effect of filler addition to bonding agents on the physical properties and the bond strength to bovine teeth. The First International Congress on Adhesive Dentistry(IAD, Program and Abstracts):434, 2002
  10. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 32:55-65, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.003
  11. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 131(Suppl.):20S-25S, 2000 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398
  12. Tanumihara M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microntensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 16:180-187, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00007-5
  13. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185-194, 1998
  14. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultra-structural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layers thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2:83-98, 2000
  15. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composites on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 3:207-225, 2001
  16. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 30:371-382, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-7
  17. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent 28:747-755, 2003
  18. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 13:60-76, 2000
  19. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 66:187-192, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80046-0
  20. el-Badrawy WA, el-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 73:515-524, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80109-X
  21. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 66:187-192, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80046-0
  22. Kato H, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin. J Oral Rehabil 27:103-10, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00489.x
  23. Hahn P, Attin T, Grotke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 17:191-196, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00067-1
  24. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Mathews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res, 73:1205-1211, 1994
  25. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 78:699-705, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780021001
  26. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 5:267-282, 2003
  27. Attal JP, Asmussen E, Degrange M. Effects of surface treatment on the free surface energy of dentin. Dent Mater 10:259-264, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90071-X
  28. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296-308, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00087-7
  29. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 17:542-556, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00016-1
  30. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 16:6-12, 2003
  31. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 5:27-40, 2003
  32. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, totaletch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 5:91-105, 2003
  33. Tanaka J, Ishikawa K, Yatani H, Yamashita A, Suzuki K. Correlation of dentin bond durability with water asorption of bonding layer. Dent Mater 18:11-18, 1999 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.18.11

Cited by

  1. The bonding durability of resin cements vol.32, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.343
  2. Effect of the additional etching procedure on push-out bond strength of one-step resin cement vol.33, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.443
  3. Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements vol.33, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.499
  4. The Effect of Temporary Filling Materials on The Adhesion between Dentin Adhesive-coated Surface and Resin Inlay vol.33, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.553
  5. The study of shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin vol.46, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2008.46.5.535
  6. Microtensile bond strength of resin inlay bonded to dentin treated with various temporary filling materials vol.36, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.419