Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제30권6호
  • /
  • Pages.486-492
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

엔진의 토크 조절 능력과 니켈-티타늄 파일의 삭제 성향이 근관 성형에 미치는 영향

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FLUTE DESIGN AND TORQUE-CONTROLLED MOTOR ON THE SHAPING ABILITY OF SIMULATED RESIN ROOT CANALS

  • 노형미 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Roh, Hyoung-Mee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Huh, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentristry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentristry, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 니켈-니타늄 파일의 삭제 성향과 엔진의 토크 조절 능력이 근관 성형에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이다 레진 모형 40개를 사용하였으며, Hero Shaper(R)와 Endo-Mate2을 이용한 HE군, Hero Shaper(R)와 Tecnika(R)를 이용한 HT군, Profile(R)과 Endo-Mate2(R)를 이용한 PE군, Profile(R)과 Tecnika(R)를 이용한 PT군으로 구분하여 근관성형 하였다. 각 군별 근관 성형 시간을 기록하였다. 근단공으로부터의 수직 이동 거리 1, 3 그리고 5mm 위치에서의 근관 삭제량, 중심이 동률을 산출하여 다음의 결론을 얻었다. 1. 근관 성형 시간은 HT군이 가장 빨랐다 (p<0.05). 2. 삭제량은 1mm지점에서 HE군이 PT군보다 컸고 (p<0.05), 3mm지점에서는 PT군이 다른 군들보다 작았다 (p<0.05). 5mm에서는 PE군이 PT군보다 컸다 (p<0.05). 3. 중심 이동률은 1mm 지점에서 HE군이 다른 군들보다 컸으며 (p<0.05), 5mm에서는 HT군이 PE군과 PT군보다 컸다 (p<0.05). 따라서 토크 조절이 되는 엔진을 사용하는 것이 근관의 변위를 적게 유발하고 과도한 삭제 량을 예방 할 수 있으며 근관 성형시간도 단축 할 수 있는 것으로 보이며 따라서 양호한 근관 성형 결과에 영향을 준다고 볼 수 있다.

The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of the two different Ni-Ti file systems and the two different engine systems in simulated canals. A total of four groups of each 10 were tested. Each group was instrumented with HeroShaper and Endo-Mate2 (Croup HE), HeroShaper and Tecnika (Croup HT), ProFile and Endo-Mate2 (Group PE), and ProFile and Tecnika (Croup PT). Canal preparation time was recorded. The images of pre- and post- instrumented root canals were scanned and superimposed. The amounts of increased width and centering ratio were measured and calculated at apical 1, 3 and 5mm levels. These data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test The results of this study were as fellows ; 1. Canal preparation time of HT group was the shortest (p<0.05). 2. The amount of increased canal width in HE group was significantly larger than PT group at apical 1mm level (p<0.05) At apical 3mm level, PT group was significantly smaller than other groups (p<0.05). At apical 5mm level, PE group was significantly larger than PT group (p<0.05). 3. The amount of centering ratio in HE group was significantly larger than other groups (p<0.05). At apical 5mm level, HT group was significantly larger than PE group and PT group (p<0.05). Under the condition of this study, torque-controlled endodontic motor is safer than no torque controlled motor, especially when the active file is used.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gambarini G. Rationale for the use of low torque endodontic motors in root canal instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol 16:95-100, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016003095.x
  2. Morgan LF, Montgomery S. An evaluation of the crown- down pressureless technique. J Endod 10:491-498, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80207-1
  3. Davis RD, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. Effect of early coronal flaring on working length change in curved canals using rotary nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instruments. J Endod 28:438-442, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00005
  4. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 26:161-165, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
  5. Calvin B, Suffridge, Gary R, Hartwell, MS, and Thomas L, Walker. Cleaning efficiency of Nickel-Titanium GT and 04 Rotary Files when used in a torque-controlled rotary handpiece. J Endod 29:346-348, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200305000-00007
  6. Haikel Y, Gasser P, Allemann C. Dynamic fracture of hybrid endodontic hand instruments compared with traditional files. J Endod 17:217-220, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81924-2
  7. Widey WL, Senia ES, Montgomery S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 74:499-507, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90303-8
  8. Bahcall JK, Barss JT. Understanding and evaluating the endodontic file. Gen Dent 48:690-692, 2000
  9. Averbach RE, Kleier DJ, Kleier DJ. Endodontics in the 21st century: the rotary revolution. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22:27-34, 2001
  10. Camps JJ, Pertot WJ. Torsional and stiffness properties of nickel- titanium K files. Int Endod J 74:499-507, 1995
  11. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preperations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 32:271-275, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
  12. William GK, David LC, David JC, William AW III. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preperation. J Endod 23:735-738, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80345-7
  13. Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14:273-277, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80025-6
  14. Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 25:441-445, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80275-1
  15. Buchanan LS. The standardized-taper root canal preperation-Part 1. Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments. Int Endod J 33:516-529, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00384.x
  16. Coleman Cl. Svec TA. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals. J Endod 23:232-235, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80053-2
  17. Blum JY, Machtou P, Micallef JP. Location of contact areas on rotary Profile instruments in relationship to the forces developed during mechanical preperation on extracted teeth. Int Endod J 32:108-114, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00200.x
  18. Yared G, Kulkarni GK. Accuracy of the DTC torque control motor for nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37:399-402, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00824.x
  19. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB and del Rio CE. A comparision of root canal preperation using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 21:146-151, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3