Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제30권6호
  • /
  • Pages.442-449
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교두변위와 선수축량의 연관성 분석

Correlation between Linear polymerization shrinkage & tooth cuspal deflection

  • 이순영 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실, BK21)
  • Lee, Soon-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Ho (department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Department of Oral Science Research Center & Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 발행 : 2005.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 논문의 목적은 복합레진과 컴포머에서, 중합수축의 양과 이로 인하여 야기되는 교두변위와의 상관관계를 알아보기 위함이다. 수복재료로서 Dyract AP, Compoglass F, Z100, Surefil, Pyramid, Synergy Compact, Heliomolar와 Heliomolar HB가 사용되었으며, 접착제로서는 SE Bond 가 사용되었다. 수복재료의 중합수축의 양을 측정하기 위하여, 자체 제작한 linometer를 사용하여, 60초간 일어나는 선수축량을 측정하였다. 한 수복재료 당 10회 측정하였으며, one way ANOVA와 사후검정방법으로 Tukey Test를 이용하여 $95\%$ 신뢰수준에서 각 수복재료의 중합수축량의 차이를 비교하였다. 치아에서 일어나는 교두변위의 양을 측정하기 위하여 사람의 상악소구치에 표준화된 MOD 와동을 형성하고(깊이 3mm, 넓이 3.5mm), 접착제를 도포한 후 광조사 시킨 후, 수복재료로 충전하였다 치아를 자체 제작한 교두변위 측정장치에 위치시키고, 광조사 시키고, 이 때 발생하는 교두의 변위를 10분간 측정하였다. 한 수복재료 당 15회를 측정하였으며 one way ANOVA와 사후검정방법으로 Tykey Test를 이용하여 $95\%$ 신뢰수준에서 각 수복재료의 교두변위 량의 차이를 비교하였다. 중합수축의 양과 교두변위의 양의 상관관계를 회귀분석법을 이용하여 분석하였다. 중합수축의 양은 Heliomolar, Surefil < Heliomolar HB < Z100, Synergy Compact < Dyract AP, Pyramid, Compoglass F (p < 0.05), 교두변위의 양은 Heliomolar, Surefil, Z100, Heliomolar HB, Synergycompact < Compoglass F < Pyramid, Dyract AP (p < 0.05) 였다. 중합수축의 양과 교두변위는 높은 상관관계를 나타내었다 (p < 0.001).

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the amount of cuspal deflection and linear polymerization shrinkage in resin composite and polyacid modified resin composite, For cuspal defelction and shrinkage measurement, Dyract AP, Compoglass F, Z100, Surefil. Pyramid, Synergy Compact, Heliomolar and Heliomolar HB were used. For measuring polymerization shrinkage, a custom made linometer (R&B, Daejon, Korea) was used The amount of shrinkage among materials was compared using One-way ANOVA analysis and Tukey's test at the $95\%$ of confidence level For measuring cuspal deflection of teeth, standardized MOD cavities were prepared in extracted maxillary premolars. After a self-etching adhesive was applied, cavities were bulk filled with one of the felling materials. Fifteen teeth were used for each material. Cuspal deflection was measured by a custom made cuspal-deflection measuring device. One-way ANOVA analysis and Tukey's test were used to determine differences between the materials at the $95\%$ of confidence level, Correlation of polymerization shrinkage and cuspal deflection were analyzed by regression analysis. The amount of polymerization shrinkage from least to greatest was Heliomolar, Surefil < Heliomolar HB < Z100, Synergy Compact < Dyract AP < Pyramid, Compoglass F (p<0.05). The amount of cuspal deflection from least to greatest was Z100, Heliomolar, Heliomolar HB, Synergy Compact Surefil < Compoglass F < Pyramid, Dyract AP (p < 0.05). The amount of polymerization shrinkage and cuspal deflection showed a correlation (p<0.001).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 17:103-111, 1986
  2. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 67:841-845, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670050901
  3. Soderholm KJM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASCDM156 Task Group on Test Methods for Adhesion of Restorative Materials. Dent Mater 7:74-83, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90049-5
  4. Robert JC, Powers JM, Craig RG. Fracture toughness of composite and unfilled restorative resins. J Dent Res 56:748, 1977
  5. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res 65:1319-1321, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650110701
  6. Krejci I. Sperr D, Lutz F. A three-sited light curing technique for conventional Class II composite restorations. Quintessence Int 18:125-131, 1987
  7. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-1639, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  8. Ernst CP, Kurschner R, Rippin G, Willershausen B. Stress reduction in resin-based composites cured with a two-step light-curing unit. Am J Dent 13:69-72, 2000
  9. Causton BE, Miller B, Softon J. The deformation of cusps by bonded posterior composite restorations: an in vitro study. Brit Dent J 159:397-400, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805746
  10. Pearson CJ, Hegarty SM. Cusp movement in molar teeth using dentine adhesives and composite filling materials. Biomaterials 8:473-476, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(87)90084-6
  11. Lutz F, Krejci I. Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 7:107-113, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90055-4
  12. Suliman AA, Boyers DB, Lakes RS. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 9:6-10, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90096-9
  13. Lee SY, Park SH. Measurements of shrinkage stress and reduction of inter-cuspal distance in maxillary premolars resulting from polymerization of composites and compomers. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 29:346-352, 2004 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.4.346
  14. Park SH, Lee SY, Cho YS, Kim SS. Amount of polymerization shrinkage stress in composites and compomers for posterior restoration. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 28:348-353, 2003 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.4.348
  15. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in class V cavities. Am J Dent 16:239-244, 2003
  16. Park SH, Krejci I, Lutz F. Consistency in the amount of linear polymerization shrinkage in syringe-type composites. Dental mater 15:442-446, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00072-X
  17. Park SH, Krejci I, Lutz F. Microhardness of resin composites polymerized by plasma arc or conventional visible light curing. Oper Dent 27:30-37, 2002
  18. Abbas G, Fleming GJP, Harrington E, Shortall ACC, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 31:437-444, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00121-5
  19. Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Sakaguchi RL, Condon JR. Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light activation. Dent Mater 18:436-444, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00066-5
  20. Christensen GJ. Tooth colored posterior restoration. Oper Dent 22:146-148, 1997
  21. Chung JH, Roh BD. In vitro microshear bond strength of five composite resins to dentin with five different dentin adhesives. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 29:353-364, 2004 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.4.353