Statistical Properties of Intensity-Based Image Registration Methods

  • Kim, Jeong-Tae (Multimedia Signal processing Lab., Dept. of Information Electronics, Ewha Womans University)
  • Published : 2005.11.01

Abstract

We investigated the mean and variance of the MSE and the MI-based image registration methods that have been widely applied for image registration. By using the first order Taylor series expansion, we have approximated the mean and the variance for one-dimensional image registration. The asymptotic results show that the MSE based method is unbiased and efficient for the same image registration problem while the MI-based method shows larger variance. However, for the different modality image registration problem, the MSE based method is largely biased while the MI based method still achieves registration. The results imply that the MI based method achieves robustness to the different image modalities at the cost of inefficiency. The analytical results are supported by simulation results.

Keywords

References

  1. J A Fessler, 'Mean and variance of implicitly defined estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): Applications to tomography,' IEEE Tr. Im. Proc., vol.5, no.3, pp403-506, Mar. 1996
  2. L. Dong and A L boyer, 'An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images,' Int. J. Tadiation Oncology Biol. Phys., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1053-1060, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)02082-9
  3. W M Wells, P Viola, H Atsumi, S Nakajima, and R Kikinis, 'Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information,' Med. Im. Anal., vol. 1, no.1, pp. 35-51, Mar. 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-8415(01)80004-9
  4. F Maes, A Collignon, D Vandermulen, and P Sutens, 'Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information,' IEEE Tr. Med. Im., vol. 16, no.2, pp. 187-98, Apr., 1997 https://doi.org/10.1109/42.563664
  5. C R Meyer, J L Bose, B Kim, P H Bland et al., 'Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin plate spline warped geometric deformations,' Med. Im. Anal., vol. Ino.3, pp. 195-206, 1997
  6. J Kim and J Fessler, 'Intensity-based image registration using robust correlation coefficients,' IEEE Tr. Med. Im., vol. 23, no. 11, pp.1430-44, Nov. 2004 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2004.835313
  7. J Kybic, P Thvenaz, A Nirkko, and M Unser, 'Unwarping of unidirectionally distorted EPI mages,' IEEE Tr. Med. IM., vol 19, no. 2, Feb. 2000
  8. J Kim, J A Fessler, K L Lam, J M Balter and R K TenHaken, 'A feasibility study of mutual information based set-up error estimator for radiotherapy,' Medical Physics, vol. 28, no. 12, pp.2391-2593, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1421374
  9. M D Srinath, P K Rajasekaran, and R Viswanathan, Introduction to statistical signal processing with applications. Prentice-Hall, 1996.
  10. B W Silverman, Nonparametric density estimation, London:Chapman and Hall, 1987
  11. T M Cover and J A Thomas, Elements of information theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1991
  12. H L Van Trees, Detection, estimation and modulation theoyr, Part I, New York: WIley, 1968
  13. J M Cramer, Mathematical methods of statistics, Princeton University Press, 1946
  14. J Kim, 'Intensity-based image registration using robust similarity measure and constrained optimization: Application for radiation therapy,' Ph.D dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2004