한국작물학회지 (KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE)

한국작물학회 (The Korean Society of Crop Science)
권호 표지

종실들깨와 잎들깨의 주요 특성 비교

Comparison of Major Characteristics between Seed Perilla and Vegetable Perilla

  • 정명근 (삼척대학교 생약자원개발학과)
  • Choung Myoung-Gun (Department of Pharmacognosy Material Development, Samcheok National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

국내에서 육성된 종실용 들깨와 잎들깨 품종을 대상으로 주요특성 및 함유성분을 분석하여 용도별 들깨의 주요특성 차이를 확인한 결과를 요약하면 아래와 같다. 1. 잎들깨 품종의 평균 개화기는 9월 28일로 종실용 들깨의 평균 개화기 9월 5일보다 약 23일 늦었으며, 경장 및 마디수도 종실들깨보다 낮은 양상을 나타내어 생육상의 뚜렷한 차이를 나타내었다. 2. 종실용 들깨의 평균 천립중, 종실수량 및 기름함량이 잎들깨 품종보다 높은 양상을 나타내어 종실특성은 종실들깨가 우수하였으나, 잎 수량 및 잎 함유 안토시아닌 함량은 잎들깨 품종이 종실들깨 품종보다 각각 1.8배 및 2.1배 높은 양상을 나타내어 잎 특성은 잎들깨 품종이 우수하였다. 3. 종실용 들깨 및 잎들깨 품종의 종실 지방산 조성은 차이가 없었으며, 잎 함유 평균 엽록소 함량은 종실용 들깨가 잎들깨 품종보다 다소 높은 양상을 나타내었다.

This study was conducted to know the difference of major characteristics between seed and vegetable perilla varieties. Perilla accessions examined were classified into two groups, i.e., seed perillla variety (saeyeopcildeulkkae, yangsandeulkkae, and younghodeulkkae) and vegetable perilla variety (ipdlkkae 1, namcheondeulkkae, and manbaekdeulkkae). The differences of growth characteristics were observed between two types of perilla varieties. The average flowering date of vegetable perilla varieties (Sep. 28) was 23 days later than that of seed perilla varieties (Sep. 5). Also, the stem height and node numbers of vegetable perilla varieties lower than those of seed perilla varieties. The average 1,000-seed weight, yield, and oil content of seed perilla varieties were higher than those of vegetable perilla varieties. However, as leaf characteristic, the leaf yield (1.8 times) and cyanidin content (2.1 times) were greater than in perilla variety for vegetable. No difference was observed in fatty acids composition between two types of perilla varieties. The average total chlorophyll content in leaves of seed perilla varieties was higher than in that of vegetable perilla varieties.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th ed. AOAC International.
  2. Choung,M. G, Y. C. Kwon, and Y. H. Kwak. 1998a. Test of componentsrelated to quality in perilla leaves. I. Test of purple pigmentin perilla leaves. RDA.1. Agri. Sci.,40 : 127-132.
  3. Choung,M. G, Y. C. Kwon, and Y. H. Kwak. 1998b. Test of componentsrelated to quality in perilla leaves. II. Test of volatile flavorcomponents in perilla leaves. RDA.1. Agri. Sci.,40 : 119-126.
  4. Chung, I. M., S. 1. Yun, J. T. Kim, 1. G Gwag,1. D. Sung, and H. S.Suh. 1995. Test of superoxide dismutase characteristics and antioxidant activity in perilla leaves. Korean J. Crop Sci., 40(4) : 504511.
  5. Han, S. I., 1. G Gwag, K. W. Oh, S. B. Pae, J. T. Kim, and Y. H.Kwack. 1997. Flowering and maturing response to seeding dateand short - day treatment in vegetable perilla. Korean 1. Crop Sci.,42(4) : 466-472.
  6. Lee, 1. I., E. D. Han, S. T. Lee, and H. W. Park. 1986. Study on theevaluation ofoil quality and the differences offatty acid compositionbetween varieties in perilla (Perilla frutescens Britton var.Japonica Hara). Korean 1.Breeding 18(3) : 228-233.
  7. Lee, J. I., C. B. Park, and S. Y. Son. 1993. Quality improvement inperilla III. Varietal differences of protein content and amino acidcomposition in perilla. Korean J. Crop Sci., 38(1): 15-22.
  8. Lim, S. D., Y. H. Seo, Y.G Lee, and N. I. Baek. 1994. Isolation ofvolatileallelochemicals from leaves ofPerilla frutescens and Artemisiaasiatica. 1. Korean Soc. Agric. Chern. Biotechno1. 37(2) : 115123.
  9. Nam, S. Y., S. T.Hong, I. 1.Kim, M.1.Kim, C. H. Lee, and T. S. Kim.2004. Growth and yield component of Korean perilla collections.Korean J. Crop Sci., 49(3) : 222-226.
  10. Oh, M. K., S. 1. Yu, J. T. Kim, Y.S. Oh, Y.K. Cheong, Y.S. Jang, I. 1.Park, and K. Y. Park. 1995. Flowering response to light intensityand night interruption in perilla. Korean J. Crop Sci., 40(5) : 543547.
  11. Park, J. H., and C. B. Yang. 1990. Studies on the removal ofphytatefrom Korean perilla (Perilla ocimoides 1..) protein. Korean 1. FoodSci. Technol. 22(3) : 343-349.
  12. 농촌진흥청. 1995. 농사시험연구조사기준. pp. 485-573.