Reproductive and Developmental Biology

The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction (한국동물번식학회)
권호 표지

Effect of Demecolcine-Assisted Enucleation and Recipient Cell Cycle Stage on the Development of Nuclear Transfer Bovine Embryos

Demecolcine 처리에 의한 탈핵과 수핵란 세포질의 세포 주기가 소 핵이식란의 발육에 미치는 영향

  • Back J. J. (College of Animal Resource Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park C. K. (College of Animal Resource Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Yang B. K. (College of Animal Resource Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim C. I. (College of Animal Resource Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Cheong H. T. (College of Animal Resource Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 백진주 (강원대학교 동물자원과학대학) ;
  • 박춘근 (강원대학교 동물자원과학대학) ;
  • 양부근 (강원대학교 동물자원과학대학) ;
  • 김정익 (강원대학교 동물자원과학대학) ;
  • 정희태 (강원대학교 동물자원과학대학)
  • Published : 2005.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effects of demecolcine-assisted enucleation and recipient cell cycle stage on the development of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) embryos. In vitro cultured oocytes for $16\~20$ h were classified by first polar body (1st PB) extrusion and cell cycle stage (MI and MII) and treated $0.4\;{\mu}L/mL$ demecolcine for 40 min before enucleation. Enucleated oocytes were fused electrically with bovine ear skin cells, activated by Ca-ionophore+DMAP, and cultured in vitro. Most of eggs ($86.2\%$) treated with demecolcine protruded a chromosome mass and enucleated efficiently ($98.8\%$, (P<0.05). Demecolcine did not have a deteriorative effect on the development of NT embryos. Developmental rate of NT embryos reconstituted with oocytes extruded 1st PB significantly higher than that of NT embryos produced by oocytes without 1st PB ($18.2\%\;vs.\;4.6\%\cdot$, P<0.05). Cleavage and blastocyst formation rate of embryos reconstituted with MI oocytes ($69.4\%\;and\;5.9\%$, respectively) were significantly lower than those of embryos reconstituted with MII oocytes ($96.7\%\;and\;23.9\%$, respectively, P<0.05). From the present result, it is suggested that domecolcine is useful for the enucleation of recipient oocytes in bovine NT procedures, and MII oocytes rather than MI oocytes are more appropriate for recipient cytoplasm. Although, the potential to develop into blastocysts of NT embryos produced by 1st PB-nonextruded and MI oocytes was very low, these oorytes could be used for NT.

본 연구는 demecolcine 처리에 의한 탈핵과 수핵란 세포질의 세포 주기가 소 체세포 핵이식란의 발육에 미치는 영향을 검토하였다. 체외에서 $16\~20$시간 성숙배양된 난자를 극체 방출 유무 및 MI, MII기 난자로 구분하여 $0.4\;\muL/mL$ demecolcine으로 40분간 처리 후 염색체 부위가 돌출된 난자는 탈핵 후 핵이식에 공시하였다. 소의 귀 피부 세포를 탈핵란에 이식하여 전기융합과 활성화 처리(Ca-ionophore+DMAP)를 거쳐 체외 배양하였다. Demecolcine처리 후 $86.2\%$의 난자가 염색체 부위의 돌출을 보여 이 중 $98.8\%$가 탈핵에 성공하였다. Demecolcine은 핵이식란의 발육에 영향을 주지 않았다. 제1극체 방출란 유래 핵이식란의 배반포 발육율은 극체 미방출란 유래 핵이식란에 비하여 유의적으로 높았다($18.2\%\;vs.\;4.6\%\cdot$, P<0.05). 한편, MI 난자 유래 핵이식란의 분할율 및 배반포 발육율은($69.4\%$와 $5.9\%$) MII 난자 유래 핵이식란에 비하여 유의적으로 낮았다($96.7\%$와 $23.9\%$, P<0.05). 본 연구의 결과는 demecolcine 처리가 소 난자의 탈핵에 매우 효과적이며 MII기 난자가 MI기 난자에 비하여 수핵란 세포질로 더 적절하나 극체 미방출란 및 MI기 난자도 비록 제한적이기는 하지만 핵이식란의 배반포 발육을 지원할 수 있음을 보여준다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barnes F, Endebrock M, Looney C, Powell R, Westhusin M, Bondioli K (1993): Embryos cloning in cattle the use of in vitro matured oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 97:317-320 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0970317
  2. Campbell KHS, Loi P, Otaegui P, Wilmut I (1996a): Cell cycle co-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev Reprod 1:40-45 https://doi.org/10.1530/ror.0.0010040
  3. Cheong HT, Takahashi Y, Kanagawa H (1993): Birth of mice after transplantation of early cell-cycle-stage embryonic nuclei into enucleated oocytes. Biol Reprod 48:958-963 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod48.5.958
  4. Cheong HT, Takahashi Y, Kanagawa H (1994): Relationship between nuclear remodeling and subsequent development of mouse embryonic nuclei transferred to enucleated oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 37:138-145 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080370204
  5. Cheong HT, Park TM, Ikeda K, Takahashi Y (2003): Cell cycle analysis of bovine cultured somatic cells by flow cytometry. Jpn J Vet Res 51:95-103
  6. Choi JB, Kim CI, Park CK, Yang BK, Cheong HT (2004): Effect of activation time on the nuclear remodeling and in vitro development of nuclear transfer embryos derived from bovine somatic cells. Mol Reprod Dev 69:289-295 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20131
  7. Collas P, Robl JM (1991): Relationship between nuclear remodeling and development in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biol Reprod 45:455-465 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod45.3.455
  8. Elsheikh AS, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Kanagawa H (1997); Developmental ability of mouse late 2-cell stage blastomeres fused to chemically enucleated oocytes in vitro. J Vet Med Sci 59:107-113 https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.59.107
  9. Fulka J Jr, Moor RM (1993): Noninvasive chemical enucleation of mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 34: 427-430 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080340412
  10. Gao S, Gasparrini B, McGarry M, Ferrier T, Fletcher J, Harkness L (2002): Germinal vesicle material is essential for nucleus remodeling after nuclear transfer. BioI Reprod 67:928-934 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.004606
  11. Gasparrini B, Gao S, Ainslie A, Fletcher J, McGarry M, Ritchie WA, Springbett AJ, Overstrom EW, Wilmut I, De Sousa P A (2003): Cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell karyoplasts and activated cytoplasts prepared by induced enucleation. Biol Reprod 68: 1259-1266 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.008730
  12. Ibanez E, Albertini DF, Overstrom EW (2003): Demecolcine-induced oocyte enucleation for somatic cell cloning; coordination between cell-cycle egress, kinetics of cortical cytoskeletal interactions, and second polar body extrusion. Biol Reprod 67:442-446 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.2.442
  13. Kato Y, Tani T, Sotomaru Y, Kurokawa K, Kato J, Doguchi H, Yasue H, Tsunoda Y (1998): Eight calves cloned from somatic cells of a single adult. Science 282:2095-2098 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5396.2095
  14. Liu JL, Sung LY, Barber M, Yang X (2002): Hypertonic medium treatment for localization of nuclear material in bovine metaphase II oocytes. Biol Reprod 67:1853-1863 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.005694
  15. Miyoshi K, Rzucidlo SJ, Gibbons JR, Arat S, Stice SL (2001): Development of porcine embryos reconstituted with somatic cells and enucleated metaphase I and II oocytes matured in a protein-free medium. BMC Dev Biol 1:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-1-12
  16. Mohamed Nour MS, Takahashi Y (1999): Preparation of young preactivated oocytes with high enucleation efficiency for bovine nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 51:661-666 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00004-7
  17. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walke S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KHS (2000): Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 407:505-509
  18. Savard C, Novak S, Saint-Cyr A, Moreau M, Pothier F, Sirard MA (2004): Comparison of bulk enucleation methods for porcine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 67:70-76 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20011
  19. Smith LC (1993): Membrane and intracellular effects of ultraviolet irradiation with Hoechst 33342 on bovine secondary oocytes matured in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 99:39-44 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0990039
  20. Tani T, Kato Y, Tsunlda Y (2001): Direct exposure of chromosomes to nonactivated ovum cytoplasm is effective for bovine somatic cell nucleus reprogramming. Biol Reprod 64:324-330 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.1.324
  21. Tsunoda Y, Kato Y (2000): The recent progress on nuclear transfer in mammals. Zool Sci 17:1177-1184 https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.17.1177
  22. Wehrend A, Meinecke B (2001): Kinetics of meiotic progression M-phase promoting factor(MPF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase(MAP kinase) activities during in vitro maturation of porcine and bovine oocytes: Species specific differences in the length of the meiotic stages. Animal Reprod Sci 66: 175-184 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00094-X
  23. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhirl J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS (1997): Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810-813 https://doi.org/10.1038/385810a0
  24. Yang X, Zhang L, Kovacs A, Tobback C, Foote RH (1990): Potential of hypertonic medium treatment for embryo micromanipulation: II. Assessment of nuclear transplantation methodology, isolation, subzona insertion and electrofusion of blastomeres to intact or functionally enucleated oocytes in rabbits. Mol Reprod Dev 27:118-129 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080270206
  25. Yin XJ, Tani T, Yonemura I, Kawakami M, Miyamoto K, Hasegawa R, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y (2002a): Production of cloned pigs from adult somatic cells by chemically assisted removal of maternal chromosomes. Biol Reprod 67:442-446 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.2.442
  26. Yin XJ, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y (2002b): Effect of enucleation procedures and maturation conditions of the development of nuclear-transferred rabbit oocytes receiving male fibroblast cells. Reproduction 124: 41-47 https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1240041
  27. Zernicka-Goetz M, Kubiak J, Antony C, Maro B (1993): Cytoskeletal organization of rat oocytes during metaphase II arrest and following abortive activation: A study by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Mol Reprod Dev 35:165-175 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080350210
  28. Zhang LS, Zhang KY, Yao LJ, Liu SZ, Yang CX, Zhong ZS, Zheng YL, Sun QY, Chen DY (2004): Somatic nucleus remodelling in immature and mature Rassir oocyte cytoplasm. Zygote 12:179-184 https://doi.org/10.1017/S096719940400276X