Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture (한국환경농학회지)

The Korean Society of Environmental Agriculture (한국환경농학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Directions for Linkages between Policy Measures and the OECD Agricultural Environmental Indicators

OECD 농업환경지표와 정책연계 방안

  • Published : 2005.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Agricultural environmental indicators (AEIs) are useful tool for evaluating environmental performance induced by agri-environmental policy measures. General and specific criteria have been set to assess the linkages between policy measures and environmental states. In addition, a number of specific AEIs such as nutrient balance indicators and farm management indicators have been posit to review environmental performance associated with agri-environmental policy measures. The proposed environmental subjects encompass soil quality, qualities of underground and surface water, water resource preservation, species and genetic diversity, diversity for wildlife habitats, and agricultural landscapes. The developed AEIs may contribute to establishment or adjustment of environmental targets and ex-ante or ex-post evaluation for environmental performance associated with policy measures. In addition, the AEIs may be useful to consider introduction of new agri-environmental measures and enhance policy efficiency by assessing environmental performance, considering specific locality, and harmonizing support measures.

Keywords

References

  1. 조인상 외.(2002). 농업환경의 계량화 평가를 위한 OECD 농업환경지표 개발 및 대책연구. ARPC최종보고서, 농림부
  2. 임송수 등.(2002). OECD농업환경지표 개발과 정책연계 방안. 연구보고서 C2002-8. 한국농촌경제연구원
  3. 김창길, 김태영. (2004). OECD농업환경지표 제출을 위한 설문서 작성. 연구보고서 C2004-25. 한국농촌경제연구원
  4. Brouwer, F. and B. Crabtree. (1998). Environmental Indicators and Agricultural Policy, UK, Wallingford, CABI Publishing
  5. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC). (2000). Environmental Sustainability of Canadian Agriculture: Report of the Agri-Environmental Indicator Project
  6. Campell, Ian, (1998). Guide to Environmental Analysis of Agricultural Policies and Programs, Agricultural and Agri-Food Canada, Environmental Bureau, Canada: Ottawa
  7. OECD. (2001). Environmental Indicators for Agriculture -Volume3: Methods and Results, OECD, Paris
  8. 농림부 국제농업국. (2004). 제20차 OECD 농업위/환경정책위 합동작업반회의 결과보고서
  9. OECD. (2004). Environmental Indicators for Agriculture - Chapter 3: OECD Trends of Environmental Conditions Related to Agriculture. COM/AGR/CA/ENV/EPOC(2004)91
  10. OECD. (1999). Envrionmental Indicators for Agriculture-Volume2: Issues and Design, OECD, Paris
  11. OECD. (2002). Agriculture, Trade and Environment Linkages in the Pig Sector. COM/ AGR/ ENV / EPOC(2002)92
  12. OECD. (2003). Agriculture, Trade and Environment: The Dairy Sector. COM/ AGR/ ENV /EPOC(2003)92
  13. OECO. (2004). Agriculture, Trade and Environment: The Arable Crop Sector. COM/ AGR/ ENV /EPOC (2004)30
  14. Sturesson, Peter. (1999). 2078/92 Agri-Environmental Measures and Future Rural Development Measures. Paper presented in the 1st Workshop on the Management and Monitoring of Agri-Environment Schemes Joint Research Center. Ispra. Italy. 23-24 November
  15. 김창길 외 7인. (2004). 친환경농업체제로의 전환을 위한 전략과 추진방안. 연구보고서 R469. 한국농촌경제연구원
  16. 김창길, 신용광, 김태영. (2005). '친환경농업의 현실과 비전'. 농업전망 2005(I)- 한국농업의 도전과 비전. M60, 한국농촌경제연구원 pp.115-142

Cited by

  1. State Indicator of Water Quality for Surface Water and Groundwater in Agriculture vol.48, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.5.509
  2. Assessment of Agricultural Nutrient Surplus in Pig-concentrated Region in Korea vol.46, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2013.46.6.482