하악전돌자에서 3차원영상을 이용한 하악지시상분할골절단술과 관련된 하악골의 해부학적 연구

MORPHOLOGIC STUDY FOR SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMUS OSTEOTOMY USING 3-D IMAGE IN MANDIBULAR PROGNATHISM

  • 박충열 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • 국민석 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • 박홍주 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • 오희균 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소)
  • Park, Chung-Ryoul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.07.30

초록

Sagittal split ramus osteotomy(SSRO) has been commonly performed in the mandibular prognathism. The previous studies of the mandibular anatomy for SSRO have mostly been used in dry skull without consideration of age, sex or jaw relationship of patients. This study was performed to evaluate the location of mandibular canal and the anatomy of ramus, such as the location of mandibular lingula and the ramal bone marrow, which were associated with SSRO procedures, in the patients with mandibular prognathism and normal young adults by using computerized tomographs(CT) and 3D images. The young adults at their twenties, who were considered to complete their skeletal growth, and seen in the Department of Orthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Chonnam National University Hospital between March 2000 and May 2003, were selected. This study was performed in 30 patients (15men, 15women) who were diagnosed as skeletal class I normal relationship, and another 30 patients (15men, 15women) who were diagnosed as skeletal class III relationship upon clinical examination and lateral cephalometric radiographs. The patients were divided into 2 groups : Class I group, the patients who had skeletal class Ⅰ normal relationship(n=30, 15men, 15women), and Class III group, the patients who had skeletal class III relationship(n=30, 15men, 15women). Facial CT was taken in all patients, and pure 3D mandibular model was constructed by V-works version 4.0. The occlusal plane was designed by three points, such as the mesiobuccal cusp of both mandibular 1st molar and the incisal edge of the right mandibular central incisor, and used as a reference plane. Distances between the tip of mandibular lingula and the occlusal plane, the sigmoid notch, the anterior and the posterior borders of ramus were measured. The height of ramal bone marrow from the occlusal plane and the distance between mid-point of mandibular canal and the buccal or lingual cortex of the mandible in the 1st and 2nd molars were measured by V-works version 4.0. Distance(Li-OP) between the occlusal plane and the tip of mandibular lingula of Class III Group was longer than that of Class I Group in men(p<0.01), but there was no significant difference in women between both groups. Distance(Li-SN) between the sigmoid notch and the tip of mandibular ligula of Class III group was longer than that of Class I Group in men(p<0.05), but there was no significant difference in women between both groups. Distance(Li-RA) between the anterior border of ramus and the tip of mandibular lingula of Class III Group was shorter than that of Class I Group in men and women(p<0.01). Distance(Li-RP) between the posterior border of ramus and the tip of mandibular lingula of Class III Group was slightly shorter than that of Class I Group in men(p<0.05), but there was no significant difference in women between both groups. Distance(RA-RP) between the anterior and the posterior borders of ramus of Class III Group was shorter than that of Class I Group in men and women(p<0.01). Longer the distance(SN-AN) between the sigmoid notch and the antegonial notch was, longer the vertical ramal length above occlusal plane, higher the location of mandibular lingula, and shorter the antero-posterior ramal length were observed(p<0.01). Height of ramal bone marrow of Class III Group was higher than that of Class I Group in men and women(p<0.01). Distance between mandibular canal and buccal cortex of Class III Group in 1st and 2nd lower molars was shorter than that of Class I Group in men and women (p<0.05 in 1st lower molar in men, p<0.01 in others). These results indicate that there are some anatomical differences between the normal occlusal patients and the mandibular prognathic patients, such as the anterior-posterior length of ramus, the height of ramal bone marrow, and the location of mandibular canal.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Trauner R, Obwegeser H : The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty, part 1: Surgical procedure to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10 : 677, 1957 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4220(57)80063-2
  2. Epker BN : Modification in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg 35 : 157, 1977
  3. Bell WH, Schendel SA : Biologic basis for modification of the sagittal ramus split operation. J Oral Surg 35 : 362, 1977
  4. Jeter TS, Van Sickels JE, Dolwick MF : Modified techniques for internal fixation of sagittal ramus osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 : 270, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90463-4
  5. Epker BN, Wolford LM, Fish LC : Mandibular deficiency syndrome. Surgical considerations for mandibular advancement. Oral Surg 45 : 349, 1968 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(78)90521-2
  6. Wolford LM, Bennett MA, Rafferty CG : Modification of the mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64 : 146, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(87)90080-6
  7. Souyris F : Sagittal splitting and bicortical screw fixation of the ascending ramus. J Maxillofac Surg 6 : 198, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80089-7
  8. Steinhauser EW : Bone screws and plates in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Surg 11 : 209, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(82)80069-0
  9. Paulus GW, Steinhauser EW : A comparative study of wire osteosynthesis versus bone screws in the treatment of mandiblular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 54 : 2, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90408-X
  10. Van Sickels J, Flanary CM : Stability associated with mandibular advancement treated by rigid osseous fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43 : 338, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(85)90253-8
  11. Martis CS : Complications after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 : 101, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90320-3
  12. Turvey TA : Intraoperative complications of sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus, incidence and management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43 : 504, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(85)80028-8
  13. de Varies K, Devriese PP, Hovinga J et al : Facial palsy after sagittal split osteotomy. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 21 : 50, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80147-7
  14. Simpson W : Problems incountered in the sagittal split operation. Int J Oral Surg 10 : 81, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80016-6
  15. Palmen E : Facial nerve paralysis following a sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Quintessence Chicago 418, 1985
  16. Piecuch JF, Lewis RA : Facial nerve injury as a complication of sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40 : 309, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(82)90227-0
  17. Van de Perre JPA, Stoelinga PJW, Blijdorp PA et al : Perioperative morbidity in maxillofacial orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective study. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 24 : 263, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(96)80056-4
  18. Acebal-Bianco F, Vuylsteke PLPJ, Mommaerts MY et al : Perioperative complications in corrective facial orthopedic surgery: a 5-year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 :754, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.7874
  19. Olivier E : The inferior dental canal and its nerve in the adult. Br Dent Assoc J 49 : 356, 1928
  20. Starkie C, Stewart D : The intramandibular course of the inferior dental nerve. J Anat 65 : 319, 1931
  21. Carter RB, Keen EN : The intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve. J Anat 108 : 433, 1971
  22. Nortje CJ : Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg 15 : 55, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-117X(77)90008-7
  23. Rajchel J, Ellis III E, Fonseca RJ : The anatomical location of the mandiblurar canal: its relationship to the sagittal ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1 : 37, 1986
  24. Smith BR, Rajchel JL, Waite DE et al : Mandibular ramus anatomy as it relates to the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 : 112, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90095-4
  25. Tom WK, Martone HM, Mintz SM : A study of mandibular ramus anatomy and its significance to sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26 : 176, 1997
  26. Kim HJ, Lee HY, Chung IH et al : Mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy in Koreans. Yonsei Med J 38 : 19, 1997 https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.1997.38.1.19
  27. Muto T, Shigeo K, Yamamoto K et al : Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus in prognathism: effect on the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61 : 89, 2003
  28. Suhr CH, Nahm DS, Chang YI : Epidemiologic study of the prevalence of malocclusion in Koreans. J Korean Assoc Orthod 14 : 33, 1984
  29. Kang HK, Yoo YK : A study on the prevalence of malocclusion of Yonsei University students in 1991. Seoul, Graduate School. Yonsei University, Dept Dental Science, 12, 1991
  30. Dal Pont G : Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg 19 : 42, 1961 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90214-8