Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

CLINICAL STUDY ON SUCCESS RATE OF TG OSSEOTITE IMPLANT

TG Osseotite 임플란트의 성공률에 대한 임상적 연구

  • Oh, Sung-Hwan (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Min, Seung-Ki (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Chae, Young-Won (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 오승환 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 민승기 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 채영원 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the prognosis of the TG Osseotite implant(3i Co, USA) placed in partial edentulous area of oral cavity and to suspect the possible causes leading to failure. 124 TG Osseotite implants that had been inserted between 2000 - 2002 were followed up for 2 years(avg : 9.5 months) in function. Medical records, and radiographs were evaluated and analyzed by the over all success rate, gender and age factor, general disease, implant fixture length and diameter, implant site, bone density, and various surgical methods. Chi square test was used statistically. Of the 124 TG Osseotite implants, 9 implants(7.3%) were removed in early phase and 3 implants(2.4%) were in late phase. The cumulative survival rate was 90.2%. The failure of the TG Osseotite implant was closely related with the use of bone graft techniques such as sinus elevation or immediate implantation and not with the age, sex, general disease, implant site, bone density of implanted site. The failure of the TG Osseotite implant was well developed when it was the wide type of implant and it was inserted for single tooth replacement. The developement of peri-implantitis was the most important factor in the failure of the TG Osseotite implant.

Keywords

References

  1. Branema PI, Briene U, Adell R, Hanssen, B, Lindstrom J, Olsson A : Intra osseous anchorage of dental prothesis.I Experimental studies: Scand J Plast Reconst Surgy 3 : 61, 1969 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036696
  2. Branemak PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A : Osseointegrated implant in the treatment of the edentulous jaw: Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconst Surg suppl 16, 1997
  3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI : A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment fo the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surgery 10 : 387, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  4. Zarb G, Schmitt : A longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Implant 55 : 220, 1998
  5. Albreksson T, Zarb G. : The longterm efficiency of currently used implants : A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 5 : 581, 1996
  6. Zarb G, Schmitt A : Edentulous predicament, I. A prospective study of the effectiveness of implant supported fixed prothesis. J Am Dent Assoc 127 : 59, 1996 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0031
  7. Lundqvist S, Haraldson T : Occlusal perception of thickness in patients with bridges on osseointegrated oral implants. Scand J Dent Res 92 : 88, 1984
  8. Garrett NR, Kapur KK, Hasse AL : Veterans administration cooperative dental implant study. Part V. Comparisons of pre treatment and post treatment dietary intakes. J Prosthet Dent 77 : 153, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70229-4
  9. Buser D, Schenk PK, Steinemann SG, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H : Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25 : 889, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  10. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Andersson B, Albrektsson T : A 1-year follow up of implants if differing surface roughmess inserted in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12 : 486, 1997
  11. Godfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hjortings-Hansen E : Anchorage of Ti-O2 blasted, HA-coated and machined implants : An Experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 29 : 1223, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820291009
  12. Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Mai TN : Preliminary results of a multicenter study evaluating a chemically enhanced surface for machined commercially pure titanium implants. J Prosthet Dent 78 : 379, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70045-3
  13. Lazzara RJ, Testori Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinsteim RL : A human histolgic analysis of oseotite and machined surface using implants with two opposing surface. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 19 : 3, 1999
  14. Davis JE : Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 11 : 391, 1998
  15. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adashi M, Caputo AM : Osseointegration enhanced by chemical stching if the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 442, 1997
  16. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A : Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 8 : 161, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  17. Nishimura K, Itoh T, Takaki K, Hosokawa R, Naito T, Yokota M : Periodontal parameters of osseointegrated dental implants. Clinical Oral Implant Research 8 : 272, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080404.x
  18. Behneke A, Behneke N, Wagner W : Hard and soft tissue reaction to ITI screw implants. 3-year longitudinal results of a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12 : 749, 1997
  19. Grunder U, Gaberthuel T, Boitel N, Imoberdorf M, Meyenberg K, Andreoni C et al : Evaluating the clinical performance of osseotite implant in maxillary and mandibular posterior area. Compendium 20 : 628, 1999
  20. Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter S : Multicenter study of osseotite implant: 4-year longitudinal report. Int J Oral Macillofac Implants 16 : 193, 2001
  21. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E : Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mat Res 29 : 1567, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820291213
  22. Park JY, Davis JE : Red blood cell and platelet interaction with titanium implant surface. Clin Oral Impl Res 11 : 530, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006530.x
  23. Brunel G, Benque E, Elhara F, Sansac C, Duffort JF : Gueded bone regeneration for immediate non-submerged implant placement using bioabsorbable materials in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implant Res 9 : 303, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090503.x
  24. Sullivan DT, Sherwood RL, Porter SS : Long-term performance of osseotite implants : A 6-year clinical follow-up. Compendium April 2001. vol. 22, No 4, 326
  25. Lekholm U, Gunne J : Survival of Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws. A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 : 639, 1999
  26. Haas R, Mensdorff-poui N : Survival of 1920. IMZ implants followed for up to 100 month. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 581, 1996
  27. JS Kim, HH Chang : Preprothetic stage dental implant failure. JKAOMS 2 : 178, 2001
  28. Misch CE : A key determinant for clinical success in; Misch CE(eds) Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, Mosby Co. 1999, pp 109
  29. Jendresen MD, Allen EP, Bayne SC, Donovan TE : Annual review of selected dental literature ; Report of the committee on scientific investigation for the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 80 : 81, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70095-2