DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Physical Design Parameters on the Constructed Wetland Performance

물리적 설계인자가 인공습지의 처리효율에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2005.09.01

Abstract

The field scale experiment was performed to examine the effect of physical design parameters on the constructed wetland performance and recommend the feasible design of constructed wetland in Korean polder areas. Four sets (each set of 0.85 ha) of wetland (0.8 ha) and pond (0.08 ha) systems were used. Two different wetland systems, a wetland-pond system and a pond-wetland system, were studied to examine the effect of wetland and pond configuration. And two different length-to-width ratios were used, 2: 1 and 0.8: 1, to examine the effect of aspect ratio. A pond-wetland system was more preferable than a wetland-pond system, and also requires a smaller area than a wetland-pond system or a wetland system to reduce T-P. There was no difference in effluent concentration between the 2:1 system and the 0.8:1 system. Although the linear velocity of the 2:1 aspect was higher than the 0.8:1 aspect, resuspension was not a factor in this study due to a very low linear velocity. From this study and other literature review, it was found that design method of paddy rice field could be applied and expanded to the design of constructed wetland in Korea. Further investigation for the detailed design parameters of constructed wetland needs be continued for design method of paddy rice to be applied in full scale.

Keywords

References

  1. APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (20th ed.). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association
  2. Dinges, R. 1978. Upgrading stabilization pond effluent by water hyacinth culture. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 50: 833-845
  3. Ham, J. H., C. G. Yoon, W. S. Koo, H. C. Kim, and H. B. Shin. 2004. Analysis of field experimental data for water quality improvement of tributary stream to estuarine reservoir using constructed wetland system. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers. 46 (5): 141-153. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2004.46.5.141
  4. Ham, J. H., C. G. Yoon, W. S. Koo, H. C. Kim, and H. B. Shin. 2005. Analysis of stream water quality improvement using surface-flow wetland. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers. 47 (1): 79-91. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2005.47.1.079
  5. Huh. Y. M. 2000. Hwaong watershed reclaimed land Development work-water quality improvement of a freshwater reservoir. Gyeonggi, Korea: Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation. (in Korean)
  6. Kadlec. R. H.. and R. L. Knight. 1996. Treatment Wetlands. FL: CRC press
  7. Knight. R. L. 1987. Effluent distribution and basin design for enhanced pollutant assimilation by freshwater wetlands. In Aquatic Plants for Water Treatment and Resource Recovery. eds. K. R. Reddy. and W. H. Smith. 913-921. Orlando. FL: Magnolia Publishing
  8. M.O.E. 1999. Basic report for integrated counterplan of the water quality conservation at Seamangeum polder. Gyeonggi, Korea: Ministry of Environment. (in Korean)
  9. Reed. S. C, R. W. Crites. and E. J. Middlebrooks. 1995. Natural Systems for Waste Management and Treatment (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
  10. Mitsch. W. J.. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons
  11. Vyrnazal, J. 1994. Algae and element cycling in wetlands. Boca Raton. FL: Lewis Publishers