DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF ALL-IN-ONE ADHESIVE TO CARIES-AFFECTED DENTIN

우식이환 상아질에 대한 all-in-one adhesive의 미세인장결합강도

  • Moon, Ji-Deok (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 문지덕 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2005.01.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of multiple application of all-in-one dentin adhesive system on microtensile bond strength to caries-affected dentin. Twenty one extracted human molars with occlusal caries extending into mid-dentin were prepared by grinding the occlusal surface flat. The carious lesions were excavated with the aid of caries detector dye. The following adhesives were applied to caries-affected dentin according to manufacturer's directions; $Scotchbond^{TM}$ Multi-Purpose in SM group, Adper Prompt $L-Pop^{TM}$ 1 coat in LP1 group, 2 coats in LP2 group, 3 coats in LP3 group, $Xeno^{(R)}$ III 1 coat in XN1 group, 2 coats in XN2 group. and 3 coats in XN3 group. After application of the adhesives, a cylinder of resin-based composite was built up on the occlusal surface. Each tooth was sectioned vertically to obtain the $1{\times}1\;mm^2$ sticks. The microtensile bond strength was determined. Each specimen was observed under SEM to examine the failure mode. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA. The results of this study were as follows; 1. The microtensile bond strength values were; SM ($14.38{\pm}2.01$ MPa), LP1 ($9.15{\pm}1.81$ MPa), LP2(14.08{\pm}1.75$ MPa), LP3 ($14.06{\pm}1.45$ MPa). XN1 (13.65{\pm}1.95$ MPa). XN2 ($13.98{\pm}1.60$) MPa, XN3 ($13.88{\pm}1.66$) MPa, LP1 was significantly lower than the other groups in bond strength (p < 0.05). All groups except LP1 were not significantly different in bond strength (p > 0.05). 2. In LP1, there were a higher number of specimens showing adhesive failure. Most specimens of all groups except LP1 showed mixed failure.

이 연구의 목적은 all-in-one adhesive인 Adper Prompt $L-Pop^{TM}$$Xeno^{(R)}$ III를 우식이환 상아질에 다층 적용했을 때의 효과를 미세인장결합강도의 측정과 주사전자현미경을 이용한 파절양상의 관찰을 통해 알아보는데 있다. 교합면 우식이 있는 21개의 치아에서 편평한 상아질 면이 노출되도록 하여 감염 상아질을 제거한 후 3개씩 7개의 군으로 분류하였다. SM 군은 $Scotchbond^{TM}$ Multi-purpose를 적용하였다. LP1 군, LP2 군, LP3 군은 Adper Prompt $L-Pop^{TM}$을 각각 단층, 2층, 3층으로 적용하였다. XN1 군, XN2 군, XN3 군은 Xeno^{(R)}$ III를 각각 단층, 2층. 3층으로 적용하였다. 각각의 상아질 접착제 처리 후, 광중합레진인 $Filtex^{TM}$ Z-250을 10mm 높이로 적층 충전하였다. 각 치아는 가로와 세로의 길이가 각각 1 mm인 막대 모양의 절편이 되도록 수직으로 절단하였다. 그 후 미세인장결합강도를 측정하였다. 측정 후 파절된 시편을 주사전자현미경을 이용하여 파절양상을 살펴보았다. 각 군의 미세인장결합강도를 one-way ANOVA와 $95\%$ 신뢰도의 Scheffe's Test를 이용하여 분석하였다. 이 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 미세인장결합강도를 측정한 결과, SM 군은 14.38{\pm}2.01$ MPa, LP1군, LP2 군, LP3 군은 각각 $9.15{\pm}1.81$ MPa, $14.08{\pm}1.75$ MPa, $14.06{\pm}1.45$ MPa로 측정되었고, XN1 군, XN2 군, XN3 군은 각각 $13.65{\pm}1.95$ MPa, $13.98{\pm}1.60$ MPa, $13.88{\pm}1.66$ MPA로 측정되었다. LP1 군은 다른 모든 군에 비해 낮은 미세인장결합강도를 나타내었고 (p < 0.05). LP1 군을 제외한 다른 모든 군 사이에는 유의한 차이가 없었다 (p > 0.05). 2. 파절양상을 관찰한 결과, LP1 군에서는 접착성 파절이 우세하게 나타났고, LP1 군을 제외한 다른 모든 군에서는 혼합형 파절이 주로 일어났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Okuda M, Tagami J, Sano H, Pashley DH. Bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etching primers. Am J Dent 12:309-314, 1999
  2. Nakajima M, Sano H, Zheng L, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effect of moist vs. dry bonding to normal vs. cariesaffected dentin with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus. J Dent Res 78:1298-1303, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780070301
  3. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, Nishitani Y, Yamada T, Itou K, Carvalho RM, Nakajima M, Pashley DH. Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 81:556-560, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100811
  4. Yazici AR, Akca T, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to cariesaffected dentin. Oper Dent 29:176-181, 2004
  5. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25:324-330, 2000
  6. Croll TP, Berg J. Simplified adhesion of compomers in pediatric dentistry. Quintessence Int 31:563-569, 2000
  7. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Oberschachtsiek H, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaption after NaOCl pre-treatment. Oper Dent 25:40-45, 2000
  8. Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Waddell SL. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent 22:194-199, 1997
  9. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 12:277-282, 1999
  10. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional. one-step and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 29:55-61, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00049-X
  11. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, alhn-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30:83-90, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7
  12. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. 'No-bottle' vs 'multi-bottle' dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373-380, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1
  13. Sengun A, Unlu N, Ozer F, OztUrk B. Bond strength of five current adhesives to caries-affected dentin. J Oral Rehabil 29:777-781, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00871.x
  14. Kurosaki N, Kubota M, Yamamoto Y, Fusayama T. The effect of etching on the dentin of the clinical cavity floor. Quintessence Int 21:87-92, 1990
  15. Perdigao J. Swift EJ Jr, Denehy GE, Wefel JS, Donly KJ. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 73:44-55, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730010601
  16. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-240, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  17. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 14:212-221, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00034-7
  18. Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Victoria Fuentes M, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentine. J Dent 31:469-477, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00088-5
  19. Ai H, Nagai M. Effect of the adhesive layer thickness on the fracture toughness of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 19:153-163, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00024-6
  20. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26:97-104, 2001
  21. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 27:619-625, 1996
  22. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T, Vanherle G. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 9:167-173, 1996
  23. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater 11:234-238, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80055-7
  24. Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems. Oper Dent 26:44-47, 2001
  25. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: Structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 25:441-458, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00065-6
  26. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebusi S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Jhonson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strength of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 75:1404-1413, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750061201
  27. Cehreli ZC, Yazici AR, Akca T, Ozgunaltay G. A morphological and micro-tensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected human dentine after four different caries removal techniques. J Dent 31:429-435, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00011-3
  28. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 74:1679-1688, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740100901