Journal of Chest Surgery

  • 제38권10호
  • /
  • Pages.685-692
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2765-1606(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-1614(eISSN)
대한심장혈관흉부외과학회 (The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery)
권호 표지

심근경색으로 좌심실 벽 운동장애를 가진 환자들에서 관상동맥 우회술 후 장기생존율

Long-term Survival after CABG in Patients with Abnormal LV Wall Motion after MI

  • 이미경 (원광대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 최순호 (원광대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 최종범 (원광대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실)
  • Lee, Mi-Kyung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Soon-Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jong-Bum (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2005.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

배경: 좌심실 벽 운동장애는 관상동맥 우회술 후 장기생존율에 영향을 줄 수 있다. 이 연구는 심근경색증 후 발생한 좌심실 벽 운동장애가 관상동맥 우회술 후 장기생존율에 어떠한 영향을 주는가를 알아보았다. 대상 및 방법: 관상동맥 우회술 후 9년이 넘은 환자들 133예(남/여, 92/41)를 대상으로, 심근경색 후 좌심실 벽 운동장애가 있는 환자 56예(남/여 42/14, 평균연령 $59.2\pm9.2$세)와 좌심실 벽 운동장애가 없는 환자 77예(남/여 50/27,평균연령 $58.0\pm7.6$세)로 나누어 비교 분석하였다. 대부분의 환자들(l12/133, $84.2\%$)에서 체외순환 하에 좌측 속 가슴동맥과 하지 큰 두렁정맥을 이용하여 수술하였고 대동맥 차단 상태에서 근위연결 및 원위연결을 시행하는 방법으로 수술하였다. 걸과: 좌심실 벽 운동장애가 있는 환자들의 좌심실 구혈률은 평균 $48.7\pm13.2\%$로 좌심실 벽 운동장애가 없는 환자들(평균$57.1\pm10.1\%$)보다 감소되어 있었다(p=0.0001). 운동장애가 없는 환자군에서 평균 $135.1\pm18.0$개월의 추적으로 5년, 10년, 13년의 생존율은 각각 $85.7\pm4.0\%,\;76.2\;4.9\%,\;57.2\pm10.3\%$였고, 좌심실 운동장애가 있는 환자군에서 평균 $122.8\pm22.7$개월의 추적으로 5년, 10년, 13년의 생존율은 각각 $80.4\pm5.3\%,\;58.7\pm7.3\%,\;11.9\pm7.9\%$이었다(p=0.1). 심근경색에 의한 좌점실 벽 국소 운동장애가 있는 환자의 장기생존율에 영향을 미치는 인자는 좌심실 구혈률과 외래 치료였다. 다변량 분석에서 좌심실 벽 운동장애가 있는 환자군의 장기생존율은 외래 치료를 한 환자에서 우수하였고 좌심실 벽 운동장애가 없는 군의 장기생존율은 여성에서 우수하였다. 결론: 심근경색 후 좌심실 벽의 운동장애가 있는 경우 장기 생존율은 운동장애가 없는 경우보다 떨어지는 경향을 보이며, 그런 환자들에서 수술 후 외래 치료가 장기 생존에 매우 중요하다고 생각한다.

Background: Wall motion abnormalities may be a significant predictor for long-term survival after coronary bypass surgery (CABG). The aim of this study is to see whether post-infarction wall motion abnormality of left ventricle affect on the long-term survival after CABG. Material and Method: One-hundred and thirty-three patients (male/female, 92/41) undergoing CABG more than 9 years ago were included in this study. Fifty-six patients (M/F, 42/14; mean age, $59.2\pm9.2$ years) with LV wall motion abnormalities were compared to 77 patients (M/F, 50/27; mean age, $58.0\pm7.6$ years) without the wall motion abnormalities. Most patients (112/133, $84.2\%$) had undergone on-pump CABG with the in-situ left internal thoracic artery and free grafts of saphenous vein, in which the proximal and distal anastomoses were done for the single aortic cross-clamping period. Result: Ejection fraction of left ventricle was lower in the group with LV wall motion abnormalities (mean ejection fraction, $48.7\pm13.2\%$) compared to the group without wall motion abnormalities (mean ejection fraction, $57.1\pm10.1\%$)(p=0.0001). Risk­unadjusted survivals after CABG in the group without wall motion abnormalities were $85.7\pm4.0\%,\;76.2\pm4.9\%,\;and\;57.2\pm10.3\%$ at 5, 10, and 13 years, respectively, and in the group with wall motion abnormalities were $80.4\pm5.3\%,\;58.7\pm7.3\%,\;and\;51.9\pm7.9\%$ at 5, 10, and 13 years, respectively (p=0.1). In univariate analysis, predictable factors of long-term survival in the patients with LV wall motion abnormalities were LV ejection fraction and post operative outpatient treatment. In multivariate analysis, predictable factor of long-term survival in the patients with the wall motion abnormalities was postoperative outpatient treatment, and that in those without the wall motion abnormalities was female. Conclusion: Although there was no significant survival difference after CABG between the group with LV wall motion abnormalities and that without wall motion abnormalities, the survival in the group with wall motion abnormalities seems to be more decreased. For the patients with LV wall motion abnormalities after myocardial infarction, the post-CABG outpatient treatment is suggested to be an important factor for the long-term survival.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Levine RA, Hung J, Otsuji Y, et al. Mechanistic insights into functional mitral regurgitation. Curr Cardiol Rep 2002; 4:125-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-002-0024-6
  2. Choi JB, Lee MK, Jeong ET. Long-term survival after coronary artery bypass surgery. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;38:139-45
  3. Trachiotis GD, Weintraub WS, Johnston TS, Jones EL, Guyton RA, Craver JM. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1632-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00773-5
  4. Swynghedauw B. Molecular mechanisms of myocardial remodeling. Physiol Rev 1999;79:215-62
  5. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation 1990;81:1161-72 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.81.4.1161
  6. Anversa P, Sonnenblick EH. Ischemic cardiomyopathy: pathophysiologic mechanisms. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1990;33: 49-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-0620(90)90039-5
  7. Zumwalt RE, Ritter MR. Incorrect death certification. An invitation to obfuscation. Postgrad Med 1987;81:245-7, 250, 253-4 https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1987.11699876
  8. Myers WO, Blackstone EH, Davis K, Foster ED, Kaiser GC. CASS Registry long term surgical survival. Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:488-498 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00563-4
  9. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B. Sergeant PT, Blackstone EH, Meyns BP. Validation and interdependence with patient-variables of the influence of procedural variables on early and late survival after CABG. K.U. Leuven Coronary Surgery Program. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:1-19 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(97)00134-6
  10. Grover FL, Shroyer AL, Hammermeister KE. Calculating risk and outcome: the Veterans Affairs database. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62(5 Suppl):S6-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00821-1
  11. Herlitz J, Brandrup G, Caidahl K, et al. Death, mode of death, morbidity and requirement for rehospitalization during 2 years after coronary artery bypass grafting in relation to preoperative ejection fraction. Coron Artery Dis 1996;7: 807-12 https://doi.org/10.1097/00019501-199611000-00003
  12. Gulcan O, Turkoz R, Turkoz A, Caliskan E, Sezgin AT. On-pump/beating-heart myocardial protection for isolated or combined coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction: assessment of myocardial function and clinical outcome. Heart Surg Forum 2005;8: E178-83 https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041166
  13. Luciani GB, Montalbano G, Casali G, Mazzucco A. Predicting long-term functional results after myocardial revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:478-89 https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2000.108692
  14. Herlitz J, Karlson BW, Sjoland H, et al. Long term prognosis after CABG in relation to preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction. Int J Cardiol 2000;72:163-71; discussion 173-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00187-4
  15. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:599-605 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00620-6
  16. Lorusso R, La Canna G, Ceconi C, et al. Long-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting procedure in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction and hibernating myocardium. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:937-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00945-9
  17. Salmon B. Differences between men and women in compliance with risk factor reduction: before and after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Vasc Nurs 2001;19:73-7 https://doi.org/10.1067/mvn.2001.117985
  18. Ott RA, Gutfinger DE, Alimadadian H, et al. Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: why women take longer to recover. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2001;42:311-5
  19. Caulin-Glaser T, Blum M, Schmeizl R, Prigerson HG, Zaret B, Mazure CM. Gender differences in referral to cardiac rehabilitation programs after revascularization. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2001;21:24-30 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-200101000-00006
  20. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B. Is return of angina after coronary artery bypass grafting immutable, can it be delayed, and is it important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116:440-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70010-8
  21. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B, Stockman B, Jashari R. First cardiological or cardiosurgical reintervention for ischemic heart disease after primary coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:480-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00214-0
  22. Herlitz J, Wiklund I, Sjoland H, et al. Relief of symptoms and improvement of health-related quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass graft in women and men. Clin Cardiol 2001;24:385-92 https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960240508