DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identifying Relative Importance of Foodservice Attributes to Design a New University Foodservice Operation

대학 내 신규 학생식당의 운영 모델 제안을 위한 급식서비스 속성의 상대적 중요도 규명

  • Published : 2005.08.01

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to: (a) identify students' patronage behaviors on university foodservice, (b) evaluate customers' perception and detect complaints on food service quality, and (c) recommend new design of food service operation by identifying relative importance of university foodservice attributes. The questionnaire was developed and distributed to 400 undergraduates. Statistical data analysis was completed using SPSS/Win 12.0 for descriptive analysis and conjoint analysis. The results of this study were summarized as follows: Students were patronizing university foodservice 3.4 times per week because of 'a short distance', 'a low price' and 'speedy meals' and evaluated overall satisfaction and value as low level. Customers were dissatisfied with eight among twelve food service attributes including handling customer's complain ASAP, According to conjoint analysis, price $(37\%)$ was considered as the most important factor and atmosphere $(30\%),\;food\;(22\%)$ and distance $(11\%)$ were the next factors. Profile 2, which had 4 attributes of a location within 6-10 min, comfortable circumstances, a meal served with 4 side-dish and dessert and a meal price of \2,000 firstly, were recommend as new food service operation model.

본 연구에서는 강원도 소재 대학교에 재학 중인 학부 학생을 대상으로 교내 학생식 당 이용 실태 및 급식서비스 수준을 조사$\cdot$분석하고 컨조인트 분석기법을 이용하여 가상 학생식당의 주요 속성에 대한 고객의 효용수준을 파악함으로써 신규 학생식 당의 계획 단계에서 중점을 두고 논의해야 할 필수요소를 도출하고 신규 학생식당의 모델을 제시하고자 하였다. 학생들의 학생식당 이용실태 분석 결과, 주당 평균 3.4회 학생식당을 이용하고 있었고, 이용 이유는 거리가 가깝고, 가격이 저렴하며 신속하게 식사를 해결할 수 있기 때문이었다. 급식서비스에 대한 전반적인 만족도$(2.77\pm0.82)$와 지불한 가격에 대해 인지되는 급식의 질인 가치 $(2.68\pm0.78)$ 모두 불만족하고 있는 상황이었다. 급식서비스의 12가지 세부 속성에 대한 인식도 조사 결과, 신속한 배식과 식당 운영시간, 가격, 식사량에 대해서는 비교적 수행 수준이 보통 이상으로 평가하였으나, 고객 불만사항 처리나 식당 시설 및 분위기에 대해서는 상당히 불만족하고 있는 것으로 나타나 이에 대한 개선이 절실한 것으로 사료되었다. 신규 학생식당 모델 도출을 위한 컨조인트 분석 결과, 급식서비스의 4가지 속성이 상충하는 상황에서 고객은 가격$(37\%)$, 분위기$(30\%)$, 음식$(22\%)$, 거리$(11\%)$ 순으로 중요하게 여기고 있었으며, 8가지의 가상급식소 프로파일 중에서 '프로파일 2', 즉 $6\~10$분 정도의 거리에 위치하고 여유롭고 편안한 분위기에서 4가지 정도의 반찬과 함께 후식을 2,000원 정도의 가격으로 판매되는 식사가 제공되는 급식소가 조사대상 대학교의 현재 여건에서 제안할 수 있는 신규 학생식당의 모델로 결론지어졌다. 본 연구 결과에서 도출된 이상적인 급식소 모델이 현장에 적용되어 새로운 급식소가 개소된다면 고객의 요구도가 적극 반영된 급식소 특성으로 인하여 현재 제기되고 있는 급식서비스에 대한 불만을 감소시키는 동시에 고객 만족을 꾀할 수 있으리라 사료된다. 또한 신규급식소에서 일정기간의 급식서비스를 제공한 후, 급식서비스에 대한 고객의 평가가 실시되어 현재의 연구결과와 비교된다면 본 연구에서 제안한 급식소 모델의 효과성도 평가될 수 있을 것으로 여겨진다. 덧붙여 고객의 평가 수준이 낮았던 급식서비스 속성의 개선이 함께 동반된다면 현재 급식소의 급식서비스 질 개선을 통한 고객 만족도의 증진이 가능하리라 본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim TH. 2000. Trends and prospects on international and domestic foodservice industry. Research of Food & Nutrition 14: 65-85
  2. Yang IS, Lee YE, Kim DB. 1998. Measuring attitude and satisfaction of Yonsei university students towards contracted vs. rented university foodservices. J Korean Soc Dietary Culture 13: 423-430
  3. Yang IS. 1996. Trends and issues of contract foodservice in Korea. Nutrition and Dietetics 96: 16-26
  4. Jang YJ. 1995. Analysis on consumer attitude for effective managerial strategy of university foodservice. MS Thesis. Yonsei University
  5. Kim HJ. 2000. Preference for foodservice operation womens' university in northern area of Seoul. MS Thesis. Sungshin University
  6. Sutherlin DH, Badinelli KA. 1993. The future of college and university foodservice: An environmental perspective. J College & University Foodservice 1: 53-61
  7. Rey SE, DeMicco FJ. 1993. Factors that influence the employment decision jobs of minority students in seeking jobs in the hospitality industry: Implications for college and university food services. J College & University Foodservice 1: 35-61 https://doi.org/10.1300/J278v01n02_04
  8. Dohrman SK. 1993. Managers profile and viewpoints. J College & University Foodservice 1: 63-69 https://doi.org/10.1300/J278v01n03_06
  9. Rudd DP, Beahen SA. 1994. Marketing for quality: State university at Buffalo food service operations. J College & University Foodservice 1: 55-59 https://doi.org/10.1300/J278v01n04_07
  10. Kwak TK, Chang HJ. 1997. Assessment of main management components for successful university foodservice operations by using SERVQUAL model. J Korean Dietetic Assoc 3: 123-140
  11. Park SW, Chang YS. 1998. A survey on the utilization university food service by student in Daejeon city. Korean J Food & Cookery Science 14: 400-406
  12. Park SW, Ha KH. 1998. Assessment of university food service by students in Daejeon area. Korean J Food & Nutr 11: 528-535
  13. Cho SH, Hong SY. 1998. Assessment of food service management in university food service. Korean J Food & Cookery Science 14: 482-491
  14. Yang IS, Kang HS, Weon CH. 2000. Customer perception levels towards service quality attributes of university residence hall foodservice by importance-performance analysis. Korean J Community Nutrition 5: 662-671
  15. Yang IS, Shin SY, Lee HY, Lee SJ, Chae IS. 2000. Constructing strategic management plan for university foodservice using conjoint analysis and multidimensional scaling. J Korean Soc Dietary Culture 15: 51-58
  16. Yang IS, Weon CH, Kang HS. 2000. University residence hall foodservice in Korea: investigation on the operation and management systems. J Korean Soc Food Culture 15: 69-78
  17. Han MJ, Yoon JY, Kim NY, Yoo YH. 2004. Satisfaction of meal and service quality in university foodservice institutions. Korean J Food & Cookery Science 20: 545-552
  18. Gil MJ. 2002. Measuring customers perception levels towards service quality attributes of Yanbian University of Science & Technology foodservice in China. MS Thesis. Yonsei University
  19. Bowen JT, Shoemake S. 1998. Loyalty: A strategic commitment. Cornell HRA Quarterly 39: 12-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-8804(97)83878-5
  20. Lee MA. 2000. Identification of the brand perception and choice attributes in construction of differentiating strategy for pizza restaurants. MS Thesis. Yonsei University
  21. Shin SY, Chang HJ, Yang IS, Chung LI, Lee BY. 2004. Assessing relative importance of Korean traditional food tour program attributes based on conjoint analysis. Korean J Community Nutrition 9: 654-662
  22. Green PE, Srinivasan V. 1978. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J Consumer Research 5: 102-123
  23. Lim JW. 1999. Marketing research. Beopmoonsa, Seoul
  24. Wittink DR, Cattin P. 1989. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update. J Marketing 53: 91-96 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251345
  25. Seo SH. 2005. Identifying relative importance of quality attributes of dining service for older adults using conjoint analysis. J Community Nutrition 7: 58-63
  26. Ahn SS, Park KY, Yang JH. 2005. Research on success factor of family restaurant through conjoint analysis. J Foodservice Management 8: 87-104
  27. Yoo JE, Shin SY, Yang IS. 2005. Key attributes of internal service recovery strategies as perceived by frontline food service employees. International J Hospitality Management. In Press, Corrected Proof
  28. Suh YK, McAvoy L. 2005. Preferences and trip expendituresA conjoint analysis of visitors to Seoul, Korea. Tourism Management 26: 325-333 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.11.015
  29. Thyne M, Lawson R, Todd S. 2005. The use of conjoint analysis to assess the impact of the cross-cultural exchange between hosts and guests. Tourism Management. In Press, Corrected Proof
  30. Danaher PJ. 1997. Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative importance of service attributes measured in customer satisfaction surveys. J Retailing 73: 235-260 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90005-1
  31. Kim CJ. 2003. Case study for identifying attributes for the selection of college food service by conjoint analysis. MS Thesis. Yonsei University
  32. Lee HY, Yang IS. 1999. Evaluation of menu quality management in business & industry contract foodservice on customer's viewpoint. Korean J Nutrition 32: 967-973
  33. Lee JM. 1999. University students' behavior model for using on/off-campus dining centers at lunch time in Daejon city. J Foodservice Management 2: 193-205
  34. Heo MH. 2001. SPSS conjoint analysis. Proceedings of 6th SPSS user conference. p 29-68
  35. Won TH, Jung SW. 2003. Korean SPSS 10K: Statistical research analysis. SPSS academy, Seoul
  36. Lee KA. 2004. Students' attitude and satisfaction towards university foodservices. Korean J Human Ecology 13: 1047-1053
  37. Woo KJ, Han BJ, Rho JO. 2004. Quality assessment of performance in the university foodservice by students living in Incheon. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 14: 294-301
  38. Park SJ, Kim JA, Lee SY. 2004. A study on attitude and satisfaction of service quality in university foodservices. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 14: 83-91
  39. Kim HY, Kim HJ, Song YH. 2000. A study on preference value of utilizing university foodservices by female students in northern part of Seoul. Korean J Dietary Culture 15: 296-306
  40. Rho JO, Woo KJ. 2003. A study on the dietary behavior of students and utilization of university foodservice in Incheon area. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 13: 362-370
  41. Lee KY, Peck DG, Jeong JG. 2004. A case study on the consulting of campus-restaurants. Accounting Research 9: 291-316

Cited by

  1. Analyzing the Importance and Satisfaction on the University Foodservice Selection Attributes of Foreign Chinese Students in Gyeongbuk Province vol.27, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2014.27.1.128
  2. A Study on Utilization and Perceived Service Quality of the University Foodservice vol.42, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.4.633
  3. Study on Price Sensitivity at University Cafeterias : Focus on Seoul and Chungcheong Area vol.26, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2016.4.26.2.117
  4. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) of Service Quality Attributes of University Foodservice by City Size vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2017.33.6.691
  5. 대학교 급식소의 급식서비스 품질에 대한 인식이 소비자태도에 미치는 영향 vol.35, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2006.35.6.815