Home Health Resource Utilization Measures Using a Case-Mix Adjustor Model

가정간호 환자구성모델을 적용한 자원이용량 비교 분석

  • Published : 2005.08.01

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure home health resource utilization using a Case-Mix Adjustor Model developed in the U.S. Method: The subjects of this study were 484 patients who had received home health care more than 4 visits during a 60-day episode at 31 home health care institutions. Data on the 484 patients had to be merged onto a. 60-day payment segment. Based on the results, the researcher classified home health resource groups (HHRG). Result: The subjects were classified into 34 HHRGs in Korea. Home health resource utilization according to clinical severity was in order of Minimum (C0) < 'Low (Cl) < 'Moderate (C2) < 'High (C3), according to dependency in daily activities was in order of Minimum (F0) < 'High (F3) < 'Medium (F2) < 'Low (Fl) < 'Maximum (F4). Resource utilization by HHRGs was the highest 564,735 won in group C0F0S2 (clinical severity minimum, dependency in daily activity minimum, service utilization moderate), and the lowest 97,000 won in group C2F3S1, so the former was 5.82 times higher than the latter. Conclusion: Resource utilization in home health care has become an issue of concern due to rising costs for home health care. The results suggest the need for more analytical attention on the utilization and expenditures for home care using a Case-Mix Adjustor Model.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrecht, M. N. (1991). Home health care: reliability and validity testing of a patient- classification instrument. Public Health Nursing, 8(2), 124-131 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.1991.tb00656.x
  2. Branch, L. G., & Goldberg, H. B. (1993). A preliminary case-mix classification system for Medicare home health clients. Med Care, 31(4), 309-321 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199304000-00003
  3. Chang, H. S., & You, S. J. (2003). An Analysis of Home Care Services. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute
  4. Cheh, V. (2000). The Impacts of Per-Episode Prospective Payment for Medicare Home Health Care on the Quality of Care: Less is Not Necessarily Worse. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc
  5. Cheh, V. (2001). The Final Evaluation Report on the National Home Health Prospective Payment Demonstration: Agencies Reduce Visits While Preserving Quality. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc
  6. Federal Register/ Vol. 64, No. 208/ Thursday, October 28, 1999 / Proposed Rules
  7. Fortinsky, R. H., & Madigan, E. A. (1997). Home care resource consumption and patient outcomes: what are the relationships? Home Health Care Serv Q, 16(3), 55-73
  8. Fortinsky, R. H., & Madigan, E. A. (1999). Alternative measures of resource consumption in home care episodes. Public Health Nursing, 16(3), 198-204 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.1999.00198.x
  9. Fortinsky, R. H., & Madigan, E. A. (2004). Interrater reliability of the outcomes and assessment information set: results from the field. Gerontologist, 44(5), 689-692 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/44.5.689
  10. Fries, B. E., Schneider, D. P., Foley, W. J., Gavazzi, M., Burke, R., & Cornelius, E. (1994). Refining a Case-Mix Measure for Nursing Homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III). Medical Care 32:668-665 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199407000-00002
  11. Goldberg, H. B., & Schmitz, R. J. (1994). Contemplating home health PPS: current patterns of Medicare service use. Health Care Finane Rev, 16(1), 109-130
  12. Goldberg, H. B. (1999). Case Mix Adjustment for a National Home Health Prospective Payment System: Second Interim Report. Abt Associates Inc
  13. Goldberg, H. B., & Delargy, D. (2000). Developing a case-mix model for PPS. Caring, 19(1), 16-19
  14. Health Insurance Review Agency (2005). Health Insurance Review and Evaluation Statistical Yearbook
  15. Hong, J. E., & Yoon S. Y. (2000). Estimation of Home Care Nursing Cost to the Patient with Cerebrovascular Disease based on a Bundle of Home Care Nursing Service. The Journal of Korean Academy Society of Home Care Nursing, 7(1), 26-38
  16. Kim, E. K. (2002). On the Feasibility of RUG-III based Payment System for Long- Term Care Facilities. Doctoral dissertation, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul
  17. Kim, J. H. (2002). Financial Crisis and Policy Instruments for Financial Stabilization of the National Health Insurance in Korea. Korean Health Economic Review, 8(2), 77-109
  18. Livesay, J. L., Hanson, K. S., Anderson, M. A., & Oelechaeger, M. (2003). Client characteristics and the cost of home care in the prospective payment system. Public Health Nursing, 20(4), 287-296 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20406.x
  19. Lee, S. J. (2003). Activity-Based Costing(ABC) home health care cost analysis. Doctoral dissertation, The Yonsei University of Korea, Seoul
  20. Manton, K. G., & Hausner, T. A. (1987). multidimensional approach to case mix for home health services. Health Care Financ Rev, 8(4), 37-54
  21. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2001). Home Help Service Manual
  22. Murtaugh, C. M., McCall, N., Moore, S., & Meadow, A. (2003). Trends in Medicare home health care use: 1997-2001. Health Aff (Millwood), 22(5), 146-156
  23. NAHC. (2002). Basic statistics about home care 2001. www.nahc.org
  24. Phillips, B., Brown, R., Cheh, V., Klein, A., Schore, J., Peter, R., & Thornton, C. (1995). Evaluation of the Per-Episode Home Health Prospective Payment Demonstration. Design Report. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc
  25. Planning Group on Public Elderly Care. (2004). Research and Development on of Public Long-Term Care System for the Frail Elderly
  26. Rooney, H., & Lang, C. (2003). The 2002 OCS State of the Industry Report. The Quality Management Focus Key Strategies for Navigating the Road Ahead. OCS System
  27. Sunwoo, D., Chung, K. H., Oh, Y. H., Cho, A. J., & Seok, J. E. (2001). Characteristics of the Elderly Needing Long-term Care and Policy Directions. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
  28. Yang B. M. (1997), Mobilizing Visiting Nurse Program Korean in Korea. Journal of Public Health, 34(1), 110-116