Uncertainty Evaluation of Ammonia Determination in Burley Tobacco

버어리종 담배중 암모니아성 질소에 대한 불확도 측정

  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

The uncertainty of measurement in quantitative analysis of ammonia by continuous-flow analysis method was evaluated following internationally accepted guidelines. The sources of uncertainty associated with the analysis of ammonia were the weighing of sample, the preparation of extracting solution, the addition of extracting solution into the sample, the reproducibility of analysis and the determination of water content in tobacco, etc. In calculating uncertainties, Type A of uncertainty was evaluated by the statistical analysis of a series of observation, and Type B by the information based on supplier's catalogue and/or certificated of calibration. It was shown that the main source of uncertainty was caused by the volume measurement of 1 mL and 2 mL, the purity of ammonia reference material in the preparation of standard solution, the reproducibility of analysis and the determination of water content of tobacco. The uncertainty in the addition of extraction solution, the sample weighing, the volume measurement of 50 mL and 100 mL, and the calibration curve of standard solution contributed relatively little to the overall uncertainty. The expanded uncertainty of ammonia determination in burley tobacco at $95\%$ level of confidence was $0.00997\%$.

Keywords

References

  1. CORESTA (2004) Tobacco-Determination of ammonia-continuous flow analysis method. CORESTA Routine Analytical Chemistry Sub-Group, DRAFT 1, April 2004
  2. EAL-R2 (1997) Expression of uncertainty of measurement, European Cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories
  3. Eurachem (1995) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurements. 1st ed. pp.1-86. Laboratory of the Government Chemist, London
  4. ILAC (1994) Uncertainty of measurement in testing: Examples of estimation of uncertainty of measurement in tests based on the ISO/TAG4 Approach. Committe Papers Supplement, Appendix 2.5, Annex H. ILAC, Hong Kong
  5. ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty of measurement, Geneva, Switzerland
  6. ISO 6488 (1981) Tobacco-Determination of water content. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland
  7. Maroto, A., Boque, R., Riu, J. and Rius, F.X. (1999) Evaluating uncertainty in routine analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 18: 577-584 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(99)00151-X
  8. Maroto, A., Boque, R., Riu, J. and Rius, F.X. (1999) Estimating uncertainties of analytical results using information from the validation process. Analytica Chimia Acta 391: 173-185 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00111-7
  9. Meinroth, G., Ekberg, C., Landgren, A. and Liljenzin, J.O. (2000) Assessment of uncertainty in parameter evaluation and prediction. Talanta 51: 231-246
  10. NAMAS (1995) The Expression of uncertainty and confidence in measurement for calibrations, NIS3003. 8th ed., NAMAS, NPL, Teddington
  11. Ricardo, J.N., Silva, B., Camoes, M.F. and Barros, J.S. (1999) Validation and quality control schemes based on the expression of results with uncertainty. Analytica Chimica Acta 393: 167-175 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00337-2
  12. Taylor, B.N. and Kuyatt, C.E. (1994) Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD