한국항해항만학회지 (Journal of Navigation and Port Research)

  • 제29권5호
  • /
  • Pages.465-473
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 1598-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8470(eISSN)
한국항해항만학회 (Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

버스 통행우선신호 도입에 관한 연구

A Study on Evolution of Bus Priority System

  • 김성득 (울산대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • Kim Sung-Deuk (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Ulsan)
  • 발행 : 2005.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

버스 통행우선신호(TSP)와 관련된 외국의 사례를 살펴본 결과 버스운행시간이 $6{\~}32\%$감소하였다. TSP 기법을 울산도심의 주간선 도로인 문수로 4.07km 구간에 오전 첨두시 1시간의 동진하는 버스에 대해서 Early Green과 Extended Green기법을 적용하였다. 앞의 기법에서 평균 통행시간이 $18.1{\~}25.8\%$ 단축되었고 통행속도는 $30.9{\~}40.1\%$ 빨라졌다. 뒤 기법에서는 통행시간이 $12.1{\~}30.3\%$ 단축되었고, 통행속도는 $30.1\%$ 빨라졌다. 따라서 우리나라에서도 버스 TSP를 도입할 수 있을 것이다.

In the analysis of the foreign cases on the use of Transit Signal Priority(TSP), the reduction in bus travel time ranged from 6 to $32\%$. This study demonstrates how TSP can be applied to Ulsan Metropolitan City. TSP techniques were used on the bus routes that run eastward for 4.07 kilometers along Munsoo-Ro, a major artery in the most congested part of the city. The simulation was performed on one hour of peak traffic time, using the two TSP strategies of Early Green and Extended Green. The use of the Early Green strategy resulted in an average decrease in travel time ranging from 18.1 to $25.8\%$ and an increase in average travel speed ranging from 30.9 to $40.1\%$. The Extended Green strategy resulted in an average decrease in travel time ranging from 18.1 to $30.3\%$ and an increase in an average travel speed of approximately $30.1\%$. This study demonstrates that TSP is effective in decreasing travel time and increasing travel speed of the bus system in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고승영(2002), 버스도착시간 정보에 대한 연구, 대한교통학회지, 제20권 제5호, pp.175-181
  2. 김성득 (2004), 버스 통행우선신호 적용사례 연구, 울산대학교 공학연구 제35권 1호, pp.63-75
  3. 도철웅(2004), 교통공학원론(상), 청문각, pp.456-465 & pp.504-508
  4. 배덕모(2002), 부천시 사례를 통한 버스정보시스템 운영효과 분석, 대한교통학회지, 제20권 제1호, pp.7-18
  5. 배상훈, 임재현(2004), 첨단버스운행관리시스템 적용사례 연구, 2004 학술발표회, 대한교통학회 부산.울산.경남지회, pp.3-8
  6. 원제무(1995), 도시교통론, 박영사, pp.59-64 & 271-283
  7. 울산광역시(2003), 울산광역시 도로정비기본계획, pp.44-52
  8. 전상민(2004), 서울시 버스교통체계 개편의 성과 버스교통, 한국운수산업연구원, 통권 3호, pp.57-62
  9. Advanced Traffic Management Systems Committee and Advanced Public Transportation Systems Committee of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America) (2002), "An Overview of Transit Signal Priority" , Prepared by the DRAFT, April, pp 1-8. & 12-13.
  10. Al-Sahili, Khaled A. and Taylor, William C. (1996), "Evaluation of Bus Priority Signal Strategies in Ann Arbor", Michigan, Transportation Research Record 1554, Washington, D.C.
  11. Davol, Angus P. (1997), "Modeling of Traffic Signal Control and Transit Signal Priority Strategies in a Microscopic Simulation Laboratory", Sc.B. in Civil Engineering, Brow University, Providence , Rl, pp.79-99
  12. Garrow, Michael and Machemehl, Randy (1997), "Development and Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority Strategies", Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Report No. SWUTC/97/472840-00068-1
  13. Illinois Department of Transportation (1993), "Cermak Road Bus Preemption Study", Summar Report, Civiltech Engineering, Inc. Itasca, IL & JRH, Transportation Engineering, Eugene, OR. October
  14. Kiel Ova & Ayman Smadi (2001), "Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority Strategies for Small-Medium Cities", December, p.9 & pp.41-66
  15. King County Department of Transportation and City of Seattle Transportation (2000), "Transit Signal Priority System Assessment Study", Rainier Avenue South Field Evaluation Draft Report Seattle, WA
  16. Ludwick, John S. (1975), "Simulation of an Unconditional Preemption Bus Priority System", Transportation Research Record 536. Washington, D.C.
  17. Parsons Brinckerhoff (1998), "Phoenix Transit's Intersection Advanced Detection Demonstration roject", Route 52. Phoenix, AZ
  18. Sunkari, Srinivasa R. & Beasley, Phillip S. & Urbanik II, Thomas (1995), "Model to Evaluate the Impacts of Bus Priority on Signalized Intersections." Transportation Research Record 1494. Washington, D.C.
  19. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (2000), "St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission Transit Priority Evaluation Project" , Eden Prairie, MN.