Assessment of Sensitivity of Photo-Chromosomal Assay in the Prediction of Photo-carcinogenicity

광염색체이상시험의 광발암성 예측능력에 대한 평가

  • Hong Mi-Young (Laboratory of Genetic Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Kim Ji-Young (Laboratory of Genetic Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Lee Young Mi (Laboratory of Genetic Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Lee Michael (Laboratory of Genetic Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
  • 홍미영 (한국화학연구원 부설 안전성평가연구소 유전독성실) ;
  • 김지영 (한국화학연구원 부설 안전성평가연구소 유전독성실) ;
  • 이영미 (한국화학연구원 부설 안전성평가연구소 유전독성실) ;
  • 이미가엘 (한국화학연구원 부설 안전성평가연구소 유전독성실)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

Photo-mutagenic compounds have been known to alter skin cancer rates by acting as initiators or by affecting subsequent steps in carcinogenesis. The objectives of this study are to investigate the utility of photo-chromosomal aberration (photo-CA) assay for detecting photo-clastogens, and to evaluate its ability to predict rodent photocarcinogenicity. Photo-CA assay was performed with five test substances that demonstrated positive results in photo-carcinogenicity tests: 8-Methoxypsoralen (photoactive substance that forms DNA adducts in the presence of ultraviolet A irradiation), chlorpromazine (an aliphatic phenothiazine an alpha-adrenergic blocking agent), lomefloxacin (an antibiotic in a class of drugs called fluoroquinolones), anthracene (a tricyclic aromatic hydrocarbon a basic substance for production of anthraquinone, dyes, pigments, insecticides, wood preservatives and coating materials) and Retinoic acid (a retinoid compound closely related to vitamin A). For the best discrimination between the test substance-mediated genotoxicity and the undesirable genotoxicity caused by direct DNA absorption, a UV dose-response of the cells in the absence of the test substances was firstly analyzed. All 5 test substances showed a positive outcome in photo-CA assay, indicating that the photo-CA test is very sensitive to the photo-genotoxic effect of UV irradiation. With this limited data-set, an investigation into the predictive value of this photo-CA test for determining the photo-carcinogenicity showed that photo-CA assay has the high ability of a test to predict carcinogenicity. Therefore, the photo-CA test using mammalian cells seems to be a sensitive method to evaluate the photo-carcinogenic potential of new compounds.

Keywords

References

  1. Ball, P., Mandell, L. and Toillotson, G. (1999): Comparative tolerability of the newer fluoroquinolone antibacterials. Drug Saf., 21, 407-421 https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199921050-00005
  2. Blackburn, G.M. and Taussig, P.E. (1975): The photocarcinogenicity of anthracene: photochemical binding to deoxyribonucleic acid in tissue culture. Biochem. J., 149, 289-291 https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1490289
  3. Brash, D.E., Rudolph, J.A., Simon, J.A., Lin, A., McKenna, G.J., Baden, H.P., Halperin, A.J. and Ponten, J. (1991): A role for sunlight in skin cancer: UV-induced p53 mutations in squamous cell carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 10124-10128 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.22.10124
  4. Brendler-Schwaab, S., Czich, A., Epe, B., Gocke, E., Kaina, B., Muller, L., Pollet, D. and Utesch, D. (2004): Photochemical genotoxicity : principles and test methods. Report of a GUM task force. Mutat. Res., 566, 65-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5742(03)00052-8
  5. Chetlat, A., Dresp, J.H. and Gocke, E. (1993): Photomutagenicity test development II. 8-Methoxypsoralen, chlorpromazine and sunscreen compounds in chromosomal aberration assay using CHO cells. Mutat. Res., 292, 251-258 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(93)90028-X
  6. Chetlat, A.-A., Albertini, S. and Gocke, E. (1996): The photomutagenicity of fluoroquinolones in tests for gene mutation, chromosomal aberration, gene conversion and DNA breakage (Comet assay). Mutagenesis, 11, 497-504 https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/11.5.497
  7. de Gruijl, F.R. (1999): Skin cancer and solar UV radiation. Eur. J. Cancer, 35, 2003-2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00283-X
  8. Dean, S.W., Lane, M., Dunmore, R.H., Ruddock, S.P., Martin, C.N., Kirkland, D.J. and Loprieno, N. (1991): Development of assays for the detection of photomutagenicity of chemicals during exposure to UV light. I. Assay development. Mutagenesis, 6, 335-341 https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/6.5.335
  9. Fu, P.P., Cheng, S.-H., Coop, L., Xia, Q., Culp, S.J., Tolleson, W.H., Wamer, W.G. and Howard, P.C. (2003): Photoreaction, phototoxicity, and photocarcinogenicity of retinoids. J. Environ. Sci. Health, C21, 165-197 https://doi.org/10.1081/GNC-120026235
  10. Gocke, E., Muller, L., Guzzie, P.J., Brendler-Schwaab, S., Bulera, S., Chignell, C.F., Henderson, L.M., Jacobs, A., Murli, H., Snyder, R.D. and Tanaka, N. (2000): Consideration on photochemical genotoxicity: Report of the international workshop on genotoxicity test procedures working group. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 35, 173-184 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(2000)35:3<173::AID-EM4>3.0.CO;2-E
  11. Hong, M.-Y., Kim, J.-Y., Chung, M.K. and Lee, M. (2005): Prediction of photo-carcinogenicity from photo-Ames assay. Environ. Mutagen Carcinogen, in press
  12. Itoh, S., Nakayama, H. and Shimada, H. (2002): In vitro photochemical clastogenicity of quinolone antibacterial agents studied by a chromosomal aberration test with light irradiation. Mutat. Res., 517, 113-121 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00058-X
  13. Kelly, G.E., Meikle, W.D. and Moore, D.E. (1989): Enhancement of UV-induced skin carcinogenesis by azathioprine: role of photochemical sensitization. Photochem. Photobiol., 49,59-65 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb04078.x
  14. Kelly-Garvert, F. and Legator, M.S. (1973): Photoactivation of chlorpromazine: cytogenetic and mutagenic effects. Mutat. Res., 21, 101-105 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(73)90005-8
  15. Koyama, H., Utakoji, T. and Ono, T. (1970): A new cell line derived from newborn Chinese hamster lung tissue. GANN, 61, 161-167
  16. Loveday, K.S. (1996): Interrelationship of photocarcinogenicity, photomutagenicity and phototoxicity. J. Photochem. Photobiol., 63, 369-372 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03044.x
  17. Muller, L. and Kasper, P. (1998): The relevance of photomutagenicity testing as a predictor of photocarcinogenicity. Int. J. Toxicol., 17, 551-558 https://doi.org/10.1080/109158198226053
  18. Murli, H., Aardema, M., Lwalor, T and Spicer, C. (2002): Photoclastogenicity-an improved protocol, its validation, and investigation of the photogenotoxicity of DMBA. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 40, 41-49 https://doi.org/10.1002/em.10086
  19. Nagayo, K., Way, B.H., Tran, R.M. and Song, P.S. (1983): Photocarcinogenicity of 8-methoxypsoralen and aflatoxin B1 with longwave ultraviolet light. Cancer Lett., 18, 191-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3835(83)90067-8
  20. Preston, R.J., Dean, B.J., Galloway, S., Holden, H., McFee, A.F. and Shelby, M. (1987): Mammalian in vivo cytogenetic assays. Analysis of chromosome aberrations in bone marrow cells. Mutat. Res., 189, 157-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(87)90021-8
  21. Stern, R.S., Thibodeau, L.A., Kleinerman, R.A., Parrish, J.A. and Fitzpatrick, T.B. (1979): Risk of cutaneous carcinoma in patients treated with oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy for psoriasis. N. Eng. J. Med., 300, 809-813 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197904123001501