ACTION POTENTIAL DIFFERENCES AND REGENERATION EFFECT AFTER MICRONEURAL SUTURE TECHNIQUE AND FIBRIN ADHESIVE TECHNIQUE IN RAT SCIATIC NERVE

신경문합술과 피브린접합술 후 활동전위차 및 신경재생 효과

  • Jung, Tae-Young (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Uk-Kyu (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Chung, In-Kyo (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Hoon (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 정태영 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김욱규 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정인교 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 신상훈 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.10.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical availability of fibrin adhesive technique with microneural suture technique. We applicated fibrin adhesive technique and microneural suture technique on cut sciatic nerve in rat and used to Compound muscle action potential of rat thigh muscle compartment and histologic finding for comparision of clinical availability. The results were as following. 1. Using latency and amplitude in Compound muscle action potential test, we compared microneural suture technique with fibrin adhesive technique for nerve regeneration effect. the means was slightly different between two method. but there's no statistically significant differences. 2. Histologic finding was similar in microneural suture technique and fibrin adhesive technique for regeneration of axon and myelin sheath in destruction site after nerve anastomosis. These results showed that the efficacy of fibrin adhesive technique was similar to that of conventional microneural suture technique. Moreover, fibrin adhesive technique is decreased operating time and imporved of incapability of accessment in conventional suture technique. Therefore this technique is a useful method to nerve anastomosis in nerve enervation and neurotransplantation.

Keywords

References

  1. Horowitz SH: Therapeutic strategies in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration. Muscle Nerve 1989;12:314-322 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880120410
  2. Kline DG: Surgical repair of peripheral nerve injury. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:843-8-52 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880130911
  3. Sunderland S: The anatomy and physiology of nerve injury. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:771-784 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880130903
  4. Brown P: Factors influencing the success of surgical repair of peripheral nerves. Surg Clin North Am 1972;52:1137-1155 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(16)39832-2
  5. Dorfman LJ: Quantitative clinical electrophysiology in the evaluation of nerve injury and regeneration. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:822-828 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880130908
  6. Lunn ER, Brown MC, Perry VH: The pattern of axonal degeneration in the periperal nervous system varies with different types of lesion. Neuroscience 1990;35:157-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(90)90130-V
  7. Seddon HJ: Three types of nerve injury. Brain 1943;66:237 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/66.4.237
  8. Sunderland H: Surgical disorders of the peripheral nerves. 2nd ed, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1975
  9. Hupp JR: Facial neuropathology, in Peterson LJ, Ellis EIII, Hupp JR, Tucker MR (eds): Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2nd ed, 1993, p697-712
  10. Mare DF, Robert TS, Gordon E, Samir KB: Autologous fibrin tissue adhesive for peripheral nerve anastomosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:963-968 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1987.01860090061020
  11. Becker CM, Gueuning CO, Graff GL: Sutures or fibrin glue for divided ratnerve : Schwann cell and muscle metabolism. Microsurg 1985;6:11-18 https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.1920060103
  12. Benke TA, Clark JW, Wisoff PJ, Schneider S, Balasubmaniem C, Hawkins HK, Perling L: Comparative study of suture and laser assisted anastomoses in rat sciatic nerves. Laser Surg Med 1989;9:602-615 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900090611
  13. Kaydin M, Okur H, Kontas O, Patiroglu TE: Fibrin glue and conventional sutured vasal anastomosis in the rat. J Surg Res 1995;59:601-605 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1995.1211
  14. Peder V, Jorgen P: A new method of skin graft adhesion. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;17:263-272 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844318309013129
  15. Delisa JA, Lee HJ, Baran EM, Lai KS, Spielholz N: Manual of nerve conduction velocity and clinical neurophysiology. 3rd ed, New York, Reven Press, 1994
  16. Norma IC, Natalio D, Rosa EF: Evaluation of fibrin glue in rat sciatic nerve repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:369-374 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198609000-00015
  17. 홍종현, 백무현, 김승흥, 민대홍: Fibrin glue가 이식 피부의 접착 및 생착에 미치는 효과. 대한성형외과학회지 1994;21:213-221
  18. Jane JA, Shaffrey CI, Sharffery ME, Spotnitx WD: Neurosurgical application of fibrin glue : Augmentation of dural closure in 134 patients. Neurosurg 1990;26:207-210 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199002000-00004
  19. Kaydin M, Okur H, Kontas O: Fibrin glue and conventional sutured vasal anastomosis in the rat. J Surg Res 1995;59:601-605 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1995.1211
  20. Silver FH, Wang MC, Pins GD: Preparation and use of fibrin glue in surgery. Biomaterials 1995;16:891-903 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)93113-R
  21. Almstr S, Cheng H, Olson L: Fibrin glue used as an adhesive agent in CNS tissues. J Neural Transplant Plast 1995;5:233-243 https://doi.org/10.1155/NP.1994.233
  22. Maragh H, Meyer BS, Davenport D, Gould JD, Terzis JK: Morphofunctional evaluation of fibrin glue versus microsuture nerve repairs. J Reconstr Micosurg 1990;6:331-337 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1006838
  23. Brain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA: Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Recon Surg 1989;83:129-135 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198901000-00024
  24. Kerns JM, Freeman JA: Effects of D.C electrical stimulation on nerve regeneration in the rat sciatic nerve. Soc Neurosci 1986;7:11-18
  25. Brown WF, Watson BV: Quantitation of axonal loss and conduction block in peroneal nerve palsies. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:237-244 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880140307
  26. Chaudhry V, Comblath DR: Wallerian degeneration in human nerves: serial electrophysiological studies. Muscle Nerve 1992;15:687-693 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880150610
  27. Dorfman LJ, McGill: Automatic quantitative electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1988;11:804-818 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880110803
  28. 김희상, 안경희: 토끼에서 Ganglioside의 말초신경재생효과에 대 한 실험적 연구. 대한재활학학회지 1992;16:154-162
  29. 권영호, 유경식: 가토의 좌골신경의 저온열처리 후 신경재생에 대한 수술중 신경활동 전위검사를 통한 검색. 대한정형외과연구 학회지 1998;1:111-114
  30. Murray JAM, Willins M, Mountain RE: A comparison of epineurial and perineurial sutures for the repair of a divided rat sciatic nerve. Clin Otolarygol 1994;19:95-97 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01189.x
  31. Terenghi G: Peripheral nerve injury and regeneration. Histol Histophathol 1995;10:709-718
  32. Awasthi D, Hudson A, Kline DG: Treatment strategies for the patient sufferring from peripheral nerve injury, in Benzel EC (ed): Practical approaches to peripheral nerve surgery. Park Ridge, Ilinois, AANS, 1992, pp25-47
  33. Gonzalez-Darder JM: Experimental microsurgery repair of spinal roots. Neurosurgery 1993;33:1083-1088 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199312000-00017
  34. Dellon Al, Mackinnon SE, O'Brien JP: Changes in nerve fiber numbers distal to a nerve repair in the rat sciatic nerve model. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:1116-1122 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880141113
  35. Hudson AR, Hunter D, kline DG: Histologic studies of experimental interascicular graft repairs. J Neurosurg 1979;51:333-340 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1979.51.3.0333
  36. Hudson AR, Huner D, Kline DG: Progression of partial injury to peripheral nerve : II. Light and electron microsurgery study. J Neurosurg 1975;42:15-22 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1975.42.1.0015
  37. Lehman R, Hayes G: Degeneration and regeneration in peripheral nerve. Brain 1967;90:285-296 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/90.2.285