Study on the Medical Comments in "Sanbeon-bang"

"산번방(刪繁方)"의 의론(醫論)에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Do-Hoon (Department of Classics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
  • 김도훈 (경희대학교 한의과대학 원전학교실)
  • Published : 2005.02.25

Abstract

This paper is mainly on the medical comments in ${\ulcorner}$Sanbeon-bang(刪繁方)${\lrcorner}$. Among the medical comments in ${\ulcorner}Sanbeon-bang{\lrcorner}$, the Ojang-noron(五臟勞論) which deals with the Hanyeolheosil(寒熱虛實) of Ojang(五臟) and Yukgeuknon(六極論) which deals with the Hanyeolheosil of 'Geun-Maek-Yuk-Gi-Gol-Jeong(筋脈肉氣骨精)', remain perfectly. By way of these theories, it argues on various types of pathogenic states and syndromes. Related to the Ojang-noron, ${\ulcorner}Sanbeon-bang{\lrcorner}$ suggests a characteristic tonifying method which is 'Exhaustion syndromes should tonify the son organ(勞則補子法)'. It is the supplement of traditional 'Reinforcing the mother organ when treating cases of deficiency(虛則補其母)'. With the Ojang-noron, the comments about 'Samcho(三焦)' remain relatively intact in ${\ulcorner}Sanbeon-bang{\lrcorner}$. The contents are based on ${\ulcorner}$Yeongchu Yeongwisaenghoe(靈樞 營衛生會)${\lrcorner}$, combined the contents of ${\ulcorner}$Nangyeong 31st difficulty(難經 三十一難)${\lrcorner}$ and the meridian line in ${\ulcorner}$Yeongchu Gyeongmaek(靈樞 經脈)${\lrcorner}$. They were quoted untouched in ${\lrcorner}Cheongeumyo-bang{\lrcorner}$ by Son Sa-mak, and became the fundamental structure of Samcho-theory of after ages. Among the medical comments in ${\ulcorner}Sanbeon-bang{\lrcorner}$, there has been much dispute over the problem about 'Chu-Tae-eum(秋太陰), Dong-So-eum(冬少陰)'. This study will pay attention to the connection between Wang Bing's views of ${\ulcorner}Sanbeon-bang{\lrcorner}$ for compilation of ${\ulcorner}Chaju-Hwangje-Naegyeong-Somun{\lrcorner}$ and the original ${\ulcorner}Sanbeon-bang{\lrcorner}$. Judging from this study, Wang Bing may have referred to ${\ulcorner}Sanbeon-bang{\lrcorner}$, ${\ulcorner}Oedaebiyo-bang{\lrcorner}$ or another medical book of similar stock, and from this he may have reconstructed the attribute of Eum-Yang(陰陽) which is related to Pye and Sin. Wang Bing's disciples may have referred to ${\ulcorner}Sanbeon-bang{\lrcorner}$, or with Wang Do, the writer of ${\ulcorner}Oedaebiyo-bang{\lrcorner}$, building up the main medical current in those days.

Keywords

References

  1. 王熹, 宋版 外臺秘要方 上下, 東洋醫學善本叢書 第四冊, 東洋醫學研究會, 大阪, 1981.
  2. 王熹 著, 高文鑄, 外臺秘要方, 華夏出版社, 北京, 1997.
  3. 孫思邈 著, 李景榮 等 校釋, 備急千金要方校釋, 人民衛生出版社, 北京, 1998.
  4. 孫思邈, 孫真人千金方, 人民衛生出版社, 北京, 1996.
  5. 丹波康賴, 醫心方, 人民衛生出版社, 北京, 1996.
  6. 丹波康賴 撰, 高文鑄 等 校注研究, 醫心方, 華夏出版社, 北京, 1996.
  7. 洪元植, 黃帝內經素問, 傳統文化研究會, 서울, 2000.
  8. 洪元植, 黃帝內經靈樞, 傳統文化研究會, 서울, 1999.
  9. 朴贊國, 黃帝內經素問注釋 上, 慶熙大學校出版局, 서울, 1998.
  10. 全達鎬, 黃帝內經素問, 醫聖堂, 서울, 2001.
  11. 全達鎬, 黃帝內經靈摳, 醫聖堂, 서울, 2002.
  12. 張登本, 白話通解 黃帝內經, 世界圖書出版公司, 西安, 2000.
  13. 凌耀星 主編, 難經校庄, 人民衛生出版社, 北京, 1991.
  14. 巢元方 薯, 丁光迪泡 主編, 諸病源候論校往 上下, 人民衛生出版社, 北京, 2000.
  15. 馬繼興, 中醫文獻學, 上海科學技術出版社, 上海, 1990.
  16. 洪元稙, 中國醫學史, 東洋醫學研究院, 서울, 1984.
  17. 嚴世藝 主編, 中醫學術史, 上海中醫學院出版社, 上海, 1989.
  18. 許叔徽, 普濟本事方, 上海科學技術出版社, 上海, 1987.
  19. 胡天雄, 素問補識, 中國醫藥科技出版社, 北京, 1991.
  20. 余自漢 外 著, 金基旺 外 譯, 黃帝內經의 起源 一中社, 서울, 2003.
  21. 段逸山, ‘素問’全元起本研究與輯復, 上海科學技術出版社, 上海, 2001.
  22. 朴贊國 主編, 東洋醫學大事興, 慶熙大學校出版局, 서울, 1998.
  23. 九五國家重點電子出版物規劃項目, 中華醫典, 湖南電子音象出版社, 長沙, 2003.
  24. 高文鑄, 外臺秘要方文獻研究, 外臺秘要方, 華夏出版社, 北京, 1997.
  25. 蔣力生, 外臺秘要方服右文獻研究, 外臺秘要方, 華夏出版社, 北京, 1997.
  26. 孫中堂, 醫心方基本內容槪述, 醫心方, 華夏出版社, 北京, 1996.
  27. 金南一, 醫案이란 무엇인가, 醫林 5月(No. 309), p.86, comsi, 서울, 2004.
  28. 丁彰炫, ‘素問’ ‘秋-太陰, 冬-少陰’ 文獻初探, 中醫文獻雜志, 第66期, pp63-64, 上海市中醫文獻館, 上海, 2000.
  29. 金晶圭 外, 難經中 臟腑生理篇에 관한 研究(I), 大韓原典醫史學會誌 vol.8, pp361-386, 大韓原典醫史學會, 서울, 1994.
  30. 金圭烈, 章楠‘醫門棒喝’의 ‘少陽三焦膀胱辨’에 對한 文獻的 考察, 大韓原典醫史學會誌 vol.7, pp50-73, 大韓原典醫史學會, 서울, 1993.
  31. 瞿岳云 薯, 學術部 譯, '肝屬中焦而非下焦', 다시 생각해 보는 韓醫學, pp79-86, 慶熙大學校 46期 卒業準備委員會 學術部, 서울, 1999.
  32. 尹暢烈, ‘三陰三陽에 關한 研究’, ‘醫哲學’, p334, 大田大學校 韓醫科大學 原典學教室, 大田, 2002.