The Application of Real Options Theory in Defense Offset Contract

절충교역에서의 실물옵션 방법론 적용에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2005.06.30

Abstract

Defense offset is considered to be all effective way of acquiring defense critical technologies and arms components as a counter-trade obligation ill defense acquisition contracts. Although arranging the offset contracts is wide]y perceived as necessary, there hardly exists an acceptable model of valuation of the offset technology. By undertaking the technology valuation approach and applying the option approach tn the offset program, we present an offset technology valuation model that maximizes social net benefit of the countries transferring the technology. This article applies our model to an actual case of defense technology transfer in the Republic of Korea. The contribution of this paper is in applying the option approach to the valuation of defense onset technology, providing for the additional flexibility to tile analysis. Our research suggests several policy implications that can be applied to the actual process of defense offsets. Our results elucidate managers' role and responsibilities in designing such a process by applying option approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성배, '절충교역 성과분석 및 발전방향', 한국국방연구원, 1994
  2. 조달본부, '절충교역 지침서', 국방부, 1999
  3. 한남성 외, '절충교역에 대한 이해와 우리나라의 추진현황', 한국국방연구원, 2003
  4. Black. F. and M. S. Scholes, 'The pricing of options and corporate liabilities,' Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83. 1973, pp.637-659
  5. Boer, F.P., The Valuation of Technology, John Wiley & Sons, 1999
  6. Ceylan B. K. and D. N. Ford., 'Using Options to Manage Dynamic Uncertainty in Acquisition Projects', Acquisition Review Quarterly, Fall 2002, pp. 241-258
  7. DISAM Manual, The Management of Security Assistance, US DoD, 2003
  8. Finnegan, P., 'Kuwait Threatens Fines Over Offset Failures,' Defense News, October 1998, pp. 19-25
  9. Glaros. G., 'Real Options for Defense.' Office of Force Transformation, Department of Defense, U.S., 2003
  10. Hull, C. J., Introduction to Futures &Options Markets, Third Edition, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, Inc., 1999, p.367
  11. Jones, W., 'The Value of Defense Industrialffsets,' The DISAM Journal, Winter 2001-2002, pp. 108-118
  12. Mard, M., 'Financial factors; cost approach to valuing intellectual property,' Licensing Journal, August, 2000a, pp. 27-28
  13. Mard, M., 'Financial factors; incomeapproach to valuing intellectual property,' Licensing Journal, September. 2000b, pp. 27-30
  14. Neuman. G. S., 'Co-production, Barter and Countertrade: offsets in the international arms market.' Orbis, Spring 1985, p. 186
  15. Pavri, Z., 'Valuation of intellectual property assets: the foundation for risk management and financing,' Proceedings of INSIGHT Conference. Toronto, 1999
  16. Petty, F., 'Defense Offsets: A Strategic itary Perspective', The DISAM Journal, Summer, 1999, pp. 65-81
  17. WTO GPR/Spec/77, Article 23, 1993. 12.15